- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
- Messages
- 80,622
- Reaction score
- 85,362
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Oh Johnson is taking lessons in controlled, shallow outrage from Susan Collins..... Draft a terse email Mike, but don't send it. That will show him your outrage."House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, said he believes Ghislaine Maxwell, a key associate of Jeffrey Epstein currently serving 20 years in prison for conspiring to sexually abuse minors, should face "a life sentence."
"If you're asking my opinion, I think 20 years was a pittance," Johnson told NBC's Kristen Welker on "Meet the Press" July 27. "I think she should have a life sentence, at least."
His remarks to NBC come as many, including supporters of President Donald Trump, clamor for testimony from Maxwell. Some followers of the case have proposed a pardon in exchange, but Trump told reporters on July 25 he hadn't considered the move.
"I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about," the president said."
Link
At the moment, Johnson doesnt seem to be following Trump’s lead here, which is rather remarkable. This hint of indepedence on his part may be due what he is hearing from his constiuents. I hear the calls to Maga legislators are overwhelmingly preoccupied with the Epstein files. Fox News can bury the story and Trump can promote new conspiracy theories, but this Epstein matter seems to be something Maga will just not let go.
That loser is spineless."House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, said he believes Ghislaine Maxwell, a key associate of Jeffrey Epstein currently serving 20 years in prison for conspiring to sexually abuse minors, should face "a life sentence."
"If you're asking my opinion, I think 20 years was a pittance," Johnson told NBC's Kristen Welker on "Meet the Press" July 27. "I think she should have a life sentence, at least."
His remarks to NBC come as many, including supporters of President Donald Trump, clamor for testimony from Maxwell. Some followers of the case have proposed a pardon in exchange, but Trump told reporters on July 25 he hadn't considered the move.
"I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about," the president said."
Link
At the moment, Johnson doesnt seem to be following Trump’s lead here, which is rather remarkable. This hint of indepedence on his part may be due what he is hearing from his constiuents. I hear the calls to Maga legislators are overwhelmingly preoccupied with the Epstein files. Fox News can bury the story and Trump can promote new conspiracy theories, but this Epstein matter seems to be something Maga will just not let go.
"It's not my lane to condemn or pardon sex traffickers, I'll leave that to Daddy Taco."He will pause just long enough to find a way to excuse pedophilia.
That loser is spineless.
He’ll do whatever Trump tells him to do.
Bull----MJ will go right along and defend trump if he pardons........................Trumpers are trash"House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, said he believes Ghislaine Maxwell, a key associate of Jeffrey Epstein currently serving 20 years in prison for conspiring to sexually abuse minors, should face "a life sentence."
"If you're asking my opinion, I think 20 years was a pittance," Johnson told NBC's Kristen Welker on "Meet the Press" July 27. "I think she should have a life sentence, at least."
His remarks to NBC come as many, including supporters of President Donald Trump, clamor for testimony from Maxwell. Some followers of the case have proposed a pardon in exchange, but Trump told reporters on July 25 he hadn't considered the move.
"I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about," the president said."
Link
At the moment, Johnson doesnt seem to be following Trump’s lead here, which is rather remarkable.
They will-------they are already being distracted by outrageous trump accusations...............never failsbut this Epstein matter seems to be something Maga will just not let go.
Is it just me, or does Mike look like character from a 1960s sitcom?
Rw media has started her rehabilitation by calling her a victim.He will pause just long enough to find a way to excuse pedophilia.
If she is pardoned, and Trump isnt named, there isn't a single thing she will say that will be trusted.She will get immunity from prosecution. But if she does get pardoned, Trump will be blasted by the left even though he would only do it if the left suffers. The left will put it all on him and say nothing about who she exposes on the left.
It's public record that they were friends at one time. Clinton was also known to associate with him. Doesn't mean either man committed a crime. She is not going to have anything on those two. If there was anything on either man, it would have gotten out already. The dirt she is going to spill will be a disappointment on both sides.If she is pardoned, and Trump isnt named, there isn't a single thing she will say that will be trusted.
This notion that if there were any dirt on Trump it would be out there is complete bullshit. There are a ton of powerful people in there that also have not come out yet.It's public record that they were friends at one time. Clinton was also known to associate with him. Doesn't mean either man committed a crime. She is not going to have anything on those two. If there was anything on either man, it would have gotten out already. The dirt she is going to spill will be a disappointment on both sides.
You notice you just said Trump. The same can be said for Clinton. At least I acknowledge that they probably have nothing on Clinton.This notion that if there were any dirt on Trump it would be out there is complete bullshit. There are a ton of powerful people in there that also have not come out yet.
Clinton is a rapist, which is something Dems generally don't have a problem saying. Or at the very least the party is pretty split on him at this point in history. Whereas Trump, from the right, there are no such caveats or admissions. Trump was literally convicted in a court of law last year and the standard line from the very reasonable both sides folks is that it was a rigged trial.You notice you just said Trump. The same can be said for Clinton. At least I acknowledge that they probably have nothing on Clinton.
You have to remember, he donated to the democratic party. Trump was a dem at the time. They both associated with other because they were both doners.
If Maxwell comes out with dirt on Trump and Clinton, you will say "see Trump is guilty like we said". If she doesn't have anything on either Trump or Clinton, you will say, "she is lying to cover up Trump". There is no winning with you libs.
You notice you just said Trump. The same can be said for Clinton. At least I acknowledge that they probably have nothing on Clinton.
You have to remember, he donated to the democratic party. Trump was a dem at the time. They both associated with other because they were both doners.
If Maxwell comes out with dirt on Trump and Clinton, you will say "see Trump is guilty like we said". If she doesn't have anything on either Trump or Clinton, you will say, "she is lying to cover up Trump". There is no winning with you libs.
Maxwell told a reporter in 2016 that Epstein filmed both Trump and Clinton having sex with underage girls.You notice you just said Trump. The same can be said for Clinton. At least I acknowledge that they probably have nothing on Clinton.
You have to remember, he donated to the democratic party. Trump was a dem at the time. They both associated with other because they were both doners.
If Maxwell comes out with dirt on Trump and Clinton, you will say "see Trump is guilty like we said". If she doesn't have anything on either Trump or Clinton, you will say, "she is lying to cover up Trump". There is no winning with you libs.
Why would anyone on either side believe anything she said?Maxwell comes out with dirt on Trump and Clinton, you will say "see Trump is guilty like we said". If she doesn't have anything on either Trump or Clinton, you will say, "she is lying to cover up Trump". There is no winning with you libs.
It's public record that they were friends at one time. Clinton was also known to associate with him. Doesn't mean either man committed a crime. She is not going to have anything on those two. If there was anything on either man, it would have gotten out already. The dirt she is going to spill will be a disappointment on both sides.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?