- Joined
- Jun 3, 2020
- Messages
- 21,231
- Reaction score
- 7,358
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
they want one.Can you provide a legitimate reason why a person would need a 30 round magazine?
they want one.Can you provide a legitimate reason why a person would need a 30 round magazine?
That is irrevant to my point.When I posted:
Are in fact AR-15s in common use for lawful purposes?
Why should intermediate scrutiny be used for rights rather than strict scrutiny?
How is an AR-15 a weapon of war?
How is an AR-15 most useful to the military?
How come one side's feelings are more important than the other side's feelings?
You replied:
"All irrelevant."
That's the extent of your defending the positions of the courts whose decisions you support.
Circles.Is an AR-15 in common use for lawful purposes?
Lots of 20 year Olds want to buy beer too......and there is no measurable difference between a 20 year old and a 21 year old in regard to being responsible enough to drink........but you see "because they want to" isn't part of the equation.they want one.
Ah, you really think that is a defense. You should find a forum discussing Authoritarianism. You may feel more comfortable there.That is irrevant to my point.
You lied when you said this:
""Because Daddy said so" isn't really a defense"
Lying again. Do you think lying about what my point was helps your case?Ah, you really think that is a defense. You should find a forum discussing Authoritarianism. You may feel more comfortable there.
I seem to have heard something like that before, that because the Authority figure says it's the right thing, it's the right thing.
It takes much fewer letters than you typed to simply type "yes" or "no". Why don't you type "yes" or "no"?Circles.
We are done. Already addressed that.
Right after you provide a legitimate reason for needing to knowCan you provide a legitimate reason why a person would need a 30 round magazine?
Already explained that.It takes much fewer letters than you typed to simply type "yes" or "no". Why don't you type "yes" or "no"?
You said this was the lie: "Because Daddy said so" isn't really a defense".Lying again. Do you think lying about what my point was helps your case?
I could only hope you'd stop replying, but you will.We are done.
No you haven't.Already explained that.
of course it is. my rights aren't dependent upon what you think I need. when you ask "what legitimate reason does someone need to own a 30 round magazine", because they want one is all that is needed. You don't have any say in what someone else can have, just because you don't like it.Lots of 20 year Olds want to buy beer too......and there is no measurable difference between a 20 year old and a 21 year old in regard to being responsible enough to drink........but you see "because they want to" isn't part of the equation.
You haven't made one. You're going on about irrelevance and not explaining how you came to the determination my possession of 30 round magazines is illegitimate.I know I said that.
Duh.
Still missing the point I see.
That isnt something I said. It's something you made up.You said this was the lie: "Because Daddy said so" isn't really a defense".
If that's the issue, either it is a defense or it isn't a defense. Which is it?
I could only hope you'd stop replying, but you will.
So why can't 20 year Olds buy beer?of course it is. my rights aren't dependent upon what you think I need. when you ask "what legitimate reason does someone need to own a 30 round magazine", because they want one is all that is needed. You don't have any say in what someone else can have, just because you don't like it.
And if 30 round magazines are made illegal?it's illegal.
its illegalSo why can't 20 year Olds buy beer?
your post seemed to indicate that you think someone needs to justify their need in order to exercise their rights. I corrected you on that. If you agree that what you think someone needs is meaningless to this debate, then ok.Oh, and where did you get the notion that me liking it or not has anything to do with it?
Why would they be made illegal? They are in common usage. The courts have already ruled on this.And if 30 round magazines are made illegal?
I made one. I even explained it to you.You haven't made one. You're going on about irrelevance and not explaining how you came to the determination my possession of 30 round magazines is illegitimate.
Then you understood my post wrong. Read it in context.its illegal
your post seemed to indicate that you think someone needs to justify their need in order to exercise their rights. I corrected you on that. If you agree that what you think someone needs is meaningless to this debate, then ok.
I read it again. It still seems you think that peoples rights are dependent upon what you think they need. If that is not your position, then please clarifyThen you understood my post wrong. Read it in context.
They already have been in many places and they used to be federal, and were not overturned.they can't be made illegal.
Me liking it or not has nothing to do with it.I read it again. It still seems you think that peoples rights are dependent upon what you think they need. If that is not your position, then please clarify
I can own a 30 round magazine in all 50 statesThey already have been in many places and they used to be federal, and were not overturned.
I never said that you said it. It's an extrapolation from your position that just because courts made decisions, regardless of the reasoning behind them, that they were good decisions.That isnt something I said. It's something you made up.