• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Michael Jackson! (1 Viewer)

He didn't really seem happy, there's no way you can deny the fact his appearance and physical condition has changed for the worse.

Now it's a matter of time for the next flurry of charges against the former King of Pop.
 
I'm moving this to Off Topic Discussion, since it has no poll whatsoever.
 
Arch Enemy said:
He didn't really seem happy, there's no way you can deny the fact his appearance and physical condition has changed for the worse.

Now it's a matter of time for the next flurry of charges against the former King of Pop.
Click to expand...


I didnt say he wasnt sick.. Whats that have to do with anything?

No. I dont think so, but I think if it does then those parents are just to irresponsible to let their boys stay alone with MJ!
 
Soviet_Guy said:
Wow, I was surprised he was found not guilty on supplying alcohol for under aged.
Click to expand...


How do you know that its true? The family lied on EVERYTHING, so how do you know if ANY of that trial was real? The family was messed up! I am not surprised at all!
 
Professional grifters they all were.....As to Michael jackson being talented, the only two songs he ever did that were good were Ben and Beat It.
 
Libertarian said:
Professional grifters they all were.....As to Michael jackson being talented, the only two songs he ever did that were good were Ben and Beat It.
Click to expand...

Was that a child molesting reference, Libertarian, "Ben" and "Beat It"? I mean, sure, Ben was a rat he was singing about, but he sang about it as if it was more than just a best friend, if you know what I mean?
 
Libertarian said:
Professional grifters they all were.....As to Michael jackson being talented, the only two songs he ever did that were good were Ben and Beat It.
Click to expand...


Rigghhttt, that is why he was the #1 selling Artist. Those werent the best, all of his songs were and we is known world-wide for all of them! :doh
 
Courtneyx3 said:
Michael Jackson is KING! AHHH I am SO happy! NOT quilty on ALL 10 COUNTS! :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

But would you let your child spend the night at his house? (Don't get me started on the parents of the children - they deserve as much blame as MJ.)

Just a reminder - not guilty is not the same thing as innocent. The man is a pedophile - even some of the jurors acknowledged the truth of that statement. Unfortunately, the prosecution had an inadequate case.
 
Libertarian said:
Hell, for a 20 million dollar settlement, I would let him molest me!
Click to expand...

My point exactly when I said "not guilty" isn't the same thing as "innocent." Innocent people make payouts like that all the time (sarcasm).

Reminds me of something that happened in this area a few years back. A well known public figure was accused of exposing himself in a public park. He denied it adamantly, wasn't there - wasn't even in town, people were out to get him because of his popularity (you get the picture). When it was finally time for the case to go to court, he took a plea bargain to a lesser charge - trespassing.

Now, if you're out of town, how exactly can you be guilty of trespassing in town?
 
edb19 said:
But would you let your child spend the night at his house? (Don't get me started on the parents of the children - they deserve as much blame as MJ.)

Just a reminder - not guilty is not the same thing as innocent. The man is a pedophile - even some of the jurors acknowledged the truth of that statement. Unfortunately, the prosecution had an inadequate case.
Click to expand...

No, I would not. LOL I like him but it would be IRRESPONSIBLE of a parent (esp those parents) to let their kids stay with him when they knew about the case from 1993. I like MJ but I would NOT let my kids stay with him! LOL I prob. feel the same way as you about the parents! LOL

Well untill you can prove that he is a pedophile, I will still like him. :) Again I think he might have done stuff, but that doesnt make me change my mind at him or his music. LOL He was not quilty and I understand that it was because prosecution didnt have anything to work with- they were scamming MJ for money. Yes, he might have done something with those kids but most of it was lies. But I have read that he is not letting kids into his room and I hope he doesn't, and if something ever comes up again, they need to question the parents. If the parents KNOW about MJ then why let your kids go around him? I think the parents should be at fault too! LOL
 
If Michael Jackson is a homosexual pedophile, that just makes him like a disproprotionate number of Catholic priests and male homosexuals....
 
Courtneyx3 said:
No, I would not. LOL I like him but it would be IRRESPONSIBLE of a parent (esp those parents) to let their kids stay with him when they knew about the case from 1993. I like MJ but I would NOT let my kids stay with him! LOL I prob. feel the same way as you about the parents! LOL

Well untill you can prove that he is a pedophile, I will still like him. :) Again I think he might have done stuff, but that doesnt make me change my mind at him or his music. LOL He was not quilty and I understand that it was because prosecution didnt have anything to work with- they were scamming MJ for money. Yes, he might have done something with those kids but most of it was lies. But I have read that he is not letting kids into his room and I hope he doesn't, and if something ever comes up again, they need to question the parents. If the parents KNOW about MJ then why let your kids go around him? I think the parents should be at fault too! LOL
Click to expand...

I hope that if you have kids who get molested, you remember that it's mostly your fault for leaving them with someone else, and that the molestors shouldn't be punished because they did something good at some point in their life.

Stupidest argument ever.

Yea, the parents are at fault, but it doesn't exempt him. If I let my kids walk around Washington Heights and they get shot, is it 100% my fault for letting them be there, or does the asshole who shot them bear the responsibility?
 
RightatNYU said:
I hope that if you have kids who get molested, you remember that it's mostly your fault for leaving them with someone else, and that the molestors shouldn't be punished because they did something good at some point in their life.

Stupidest argument ever.

Yea, the parents are at fault, but it doesn't exempt him. If I let my kids walk around Washington Heights and they get shot, is it 100% my fault for letting them be there, or does the asshole who shot them bear the responsibility?
Click to expand...


No but when the parents already KNEW MJ's history, why leave your kids with him. You obviously dont read, because I didnt not say that it was the parents fault. I said they should ALSO be at fault, because they already KNEW about MJ.

I never said the parents were at 100% fault. :doh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom