Should men, especially lawmakers, be allowed to have any say in a woman's choice to have an abortion?
Define “have a say.” Literally have a say? Well sure. If you live in a country with the right to free speech you have a right to say. Did you intend something beyond that, though?Should men, especially lawmakers, be allowed to have any say in a woman's choice to have an abortion?
You did not answer the question. Why should a man have any say or ability to make a law forcing a woman to do this or that about her body?Unless you think we should have no laws whatsoever regarding abortions, of course they should.
Thought it was pretty obvious that "have a say" meant making a law or being able to stop a woman from her decision...Define “have a say.” Literally have a say? Well sure. If you live in a country with the right to free speech you have a right to say. Did you intend something beyond that, though?
Then your OP is an oxymoron since it would no longer be the woman’s choice. The correct phrasing of the question would then be “Should a man decide if a woman can be allowed to have an abortion?”Thought it was pretty obvious that "have a say" meant making a law or being able to stop a woman from her decision...
Obviously people have Freedom of Speech. Why would anybody listen the the man though unless she wanted to.
I don't think either gender - men, women, nor anyone in between - should have any say, or make any laws, abridging a woman's choice to have an abortion. It's her body, it's her choice, end of story.Should men, especially lawmakers, be allowed to have any say in a woman's choice to have an abortion?
You did not answer the question. Why should a man have any say or ability to make a law forcing a woman to do this or that about her body?
That is the whole point.Then your OP is an oxymoron since it would no longer be the woman’s choice.
Nope. I am stating that men should have no say, and consequently have no ability to write a law, about a woman's choice to abort.The correct phrasing of the question would then be “Should a man decide if a woman can be allowed to have an abortion?”
It was... You are saying that if there are laws then men should have a say... I am saying that men should have no say.That wasn't the question. Read your own question before you tell me I didn't answer it.
That is the whole point.
Nope. I am stating that men should have no say, and consequently have no ability to write a law, about a woman's choice to abort.
It was... You are saying that if there are laws then men should have a say... I am saying that men should have no say.
**** noShould men, especially lawmakers, be allowed to have any say in a woman's choice to have an abortion?
Since "have a say" colloquially means "to have an opinion or vote" then the answer is yes, a person's gender should not infringe on their ability to express an opinion or vote on any topic.Should men, especially lawmakers, be allowed to have any say in a woman's choice to have an abortion?
That is the point... if it is his choice it is not her choice... not sure why they is so difficult....Your question in the OP was “Should men, especially lawmakers, be allowed to have any say in a woman's choice to have an abortion?” Since you clarified that the decision at that point would not be the woman’s choice, then making it about her choice is inaccurate since the ultimate decision would fall to the man and not the man. Therefore, the correction phrasing of the question really is “Should a man decide if a woman can be allowed to have an abortion?” since the woman’s choice is not relevant to what is and isn’t decided.
Why?Naturally if there are laws, men should have a say.
Why should men have a vote to oppress women and deny their right to abort?Since "have a say" colloquially means "to have an opinion or vote" then the answer is yes, a person's gender should not infringe on their ability to express an opinion or vote on any topic.
If by "have a say" you meant something more precise, please provide a more precise definition and I'll be happy to revisit the topic.
What is a man?Why should men have a vote to oppress women and deny their right to abort?
Maybe you should go back and read some kindergarten stuff?What is a man?
What is a woman?
Crazy times we're living in, just curious how we define the players in your world. To answer your question, which was really a point that you phrased as a question for some reason, as long as the "say" involved is a law decided on by elected officials then yes, men should have a say.Maybe you should go back and read some kindergarten stuff?
So, you're claiming that nobody should have the right to a vote if that vote deprives someone else of the ability to do something? That's your logic? I'm vehemently pro-choice but your logic is messed up, dude. Try a different angle. Your thread is stupid.Why should men have a vote to oppress women and deny their right to abort?
No, the correct phrasing would be: "Should a woman be allowed to carry a pregnancy to term and give birth without man's consent?"The correct phrasing of the question would then be “Should a man decide if a woman can be allowed to have an abortion?”