- Joined
- Mar 25, 2010
- Messages
- 54,087
- Reaction score
- 27,797
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
While the magazine has not yet made a link available for the story, TVNewser does have some excerpts, including the magazine’s description of the conservative host:
Abhorred by the left, adored by the right, frequently pinata’d by The Daily Show, Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly has become the very blonde face—and legs—of the network. And she’s okay with that.
Same reason they use babes to sell beer and cars; men want to watch them and women want to be them.I think FOX News hires more babes than any other network combined.
Why is that?
I think FOX News hires more babes than any other network combined.
Why is that?
Although it's kinda sad to see a network that claims to be so fair and balanced to reach for the low-hanging fruit. While effective, titties are not exactly the marketing hallmark of a serious organization.Because they understand one thing that keeps people watching. If it's pleasing to the eye, people are more likely to watch. Good business tactic.
If they hired cute women ONLY because they were cute, I would agree with you Hoplite. Megyn Kelly is incredibly smart and is a great interviewer. They're not just there because of their looks.
Really? I have not picked that up from watching her. She seems more hostile and combative than anything else.If they hired cute women ONLY because they were cute, I would agree with you Hoplite. Megyn Kelly is incredibly smart and is a great interviewer. They're not just there because of their looks.
Really? I have not picked that up from watching her. She seems more hostile and combative than anything else.
Really? I have not picked that up from watching her. She seems more hostile and combative than anything else.
I've seen worse. Neil Cavuto is an awful interviewer.
I've seen worse. Neil Cavuto is an awful interviewer.
Although it's kinda sad to see a network that claims to be so fair and balanced to reach for the low-hanging fruit. While effective, titties are not exactly the marketing hallmark of a serious organization.
This, to me, is one more coin in the Populist jar for FOX. They appeal to the lowest common denominator for advertising dollars. Hell, if smashing your face with a hammer were vogue with most Americans, FOX would be up there espousing it's benefits with their hosts proudly showing off their own bruises.
Really? I have not picked that up from watching her. She seems more hostile and combative than anything else.
She is a lawyer and that is how lawyers try to get at the truth
Personally, I find I learn more about someone's position when I don't have a journalist trying to score points for the audience wanting a jousting contest.
Ok, are you seriously claiming she doesnt softball?That's because you're used to leftist journalists tossing softballs to politicians who aren't righties. I think she's relatively good at what she does. However, this layout cheapens her. There is no need for a journalist to promote ones self as a sex pot. Women have come too far to fall back on crap like this.
Oh I'm sure there are worse. But she tends to act like head sorority sister on pledge week and I'm not looking for that in a newscaster.I've seen worse. Neil Cavuto is an awful interviewer.
Not true. I dont care if they hire Quasimodo, as long as he can do the job without turning into a dick for ratings. And I dont honestly care what network she's on, I'd have the same problem with her if she was on FOX, CNN, MSNBC, PBS, or NPR.If they hired women less pretty you would complain because the should find prettier women. No matter what Fox does you will find fault
Except she's not in a court room. And a lot of the time she isnt trying to get to the truth, she'll take someone's point and oversimplify it to where it misses the person's original point.She is a lawyer and that is how lawyers try to get at the truth
I think FOX News hires more babes than any other network combined.
Why is that?