• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Meet the Press Gregory v Greenwald

Gregory should be fined for suppression.
 
The media has decided to take the focus off of what Obama did and put it on the guy that outed what Obama did. Typical move by Obama media.

exactly what is it that Obama did which the media eliminated its focus
i look forward to your reply but doubt we will see one responsive to the question asked of you
 
exactly what is it that Obama did which the media eliminated its focus
i look forward to your reply but doubt we will see one responsive to the question asked of you

And here we have a sad example of somebody that gets his news from the Obama media and does not even know what this is really about. All he knows is Snowden is a "bad man" that revealed government secrets but he has no idea what those secrets were. It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.
 
And here we have a sad example of somebody that gets his news from the Obama media and does not even know what this is really about. All he knows is Snowden is a "bad man" that revealed government secrets but he has no idea what those secrets were. It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

what we have is an example proving there is no substance to your argument, by your failure to tell us "what is it that Obama did which the media eliminated its focus"
another failed argument
next!
 
what we have is an example proving there is no substance to your argument, by your failure to tell us "what is it that Obama did which the media eliminated its focus"
another failed argument
next!

What we have is a poster who has no argument as evidenced by the immediate use of "next".

What Greenwald is intimating is that the government is taking the heat off itself by using pressure on Greenwald for doing something that reporters have done for generations, report on what government is trying to hide. It can be argued that is their primary function as a foil to government.

Secondarily, that other reporters are being water carriers for the government on this issue---worrying more about where the information is coming from rather than where it leads and what plans government has for PRISM going forward.

Those are substantial arguments, address them.
 
Back
Top Bottom