• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Medicaid Estimates Renews Cost Concerns Over Obamacare (1 Viewer)


DP Veteran
Jun 30, 2011
Reaction score
Political Leaning
News from The Associated Press

The cost of expanding Medicaid to millions more low-income people is increasing faster than expected, the government says, raising questions about a vital part of President Barack Obama's health care law.

The law called for the federal government to pay the entire cost of the Medicaid expansion from 2014 through the end of this year.

Obama has proposed an extra incentive for states that have not yet expanded Medicaid: three years of full federal financing no matter when they start. But the new cost estimates could complicate things. In a recent report to Congress, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said the cost of expansion was $6,366 per person for 2015, about 49 percent higher than previously estimated.

Albright said that the overall cost of the Affordable Care Act's coverage expansion is still lower than estimated when the law passed in 2010. However, other factors besides per-person costs enter into that overall figure. They include the total number of people enrolled, which has been lower because many states have not expanded Medicaid.

That last paragraph is a beauty.

Glad NC didn't sign on to this free ride.
Except these numbers don't reflect actual medical claims experience of these people. Medicaid, particularly for people who are newly eligible under the ACA, is almost entirely privatized. States pay a lump sum to private insurers and those insurers are then at risk for medical costs incurred by their enrollees.

That per person dollar amount just reflects the payments states handed off to private insurers, it doesn't reflect how costly those enrollees actually were. It could just as easily indicate that the states were overly generous, as the CMS report in question hints:

There are several reasons that may account for the differences between the estimates in this year’s report and those in previous reports. First, it is possible that States reported more expenditures in 2015 that were incurred in 2014, thereby making the per enrollee costs in 2015 appear higher than they would actually be. More significantly, both in magnitude and in the direction of the growth rate, the differences in the estimates occurred largely because the managed care capitation rates were set at higher levels than anticipated for the newly eligible adults. Most of the States that implemented the eligibility expansion are covering newly eligible adults in Medicaid managed care programs, and on average the capitation rates for the newly eligible adult enrollees were significantly greater in 2014 and 2015 than previously estimated (and shown in past Medicaid reports). In particular, two assumptions varied considerably. Many States included adjustments to reflect a higher level of acuity or morbidity among newly eligible adults compared to nonnewly eligible adults. In most States, these adjustments were positive (in other words, newly eligible adults had a higher level of acuity than non-newly eligible adults), and in some cases the adjustments were substantial.34

States also included other adjustments in the capitation rates for newly eligible adults. Many States projected increased costs due to pent-up demand, expecting that many enrollees would have been previously uninsured and would use additional services in the first several months of coverage. Some States also included adjustments for adverse selection with the anticipation that the persons who were most likely to enroll in the first year would be those with the greatest health care needs.

Data for newly eligible adults are still limited. While CMS has reported some enrollment and expenditure data for this group, data on claims and managed care encounters, along with data on the health status and demographics of these enrollees, are not available. Thus, there is still considerable uncertainty about the health care costs of newly eligible adults in 2014 and 2015, as well as for future years.

That would comport with the fact that the same insurers whining about negative margins on the ACA's exchange population have been making a killing off the ACA's Medicaid expansion.

Medicaid business booms for some health insurers
Though some major U.S. health insurers are sustaining financial losses tied to their Affordable Care Act individual policies, another aspect of the health law has proved more profitable--Medicaid expansion.

Fourth-quarter earnings reports from the "big five" insurers show some promising results from their Medicare and Medicaid business lines, even as they struggled to make a profit on ACA-compliant individual policies. The earnings reports from a few other insurers, though, are even more indicative of the trend of rising Medicaid profits.

I would expect plenty of states to start correcting those Medicaid payment amounts to insurers going forward (my own state just announced reductions to those payments starting this October).

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom