The majority of Republicans consider news based on facts is far left, and conversely far right propaganda is news.lol...I decided to check out a few news sources this morning on the Media Bias fact check site and found myself rather amused.
First, they call the Economist "least biased," and they plop it dead-center on the left-right continuum.
Well, hate to say but the Economist leans right. It's factual for sure, but their bias is always pro-business, which by definition is Right.
The Economist - Bias and Credibility
LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotionmediabiasfactcheck.com
They seem to be on target with the Wall Street Journal, calling it to the right of center-right.
Wall Street Journal - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words
And, they nail it with Fox, pushing it toward the extreme Right.
Fox News (foxnews.com) - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
But, they totally blow it on CNN, WaPo and NYT.
Left-Center? Hmmm....I see more Center-Right in those pages.
New York Times - Bias and Credibility
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording
Washington post is not left-center. They are dead center. Certainly they are more center than the Economist.
Washington Post - Bias and Credibility
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording
CNN is not "Left." How on earth can a source that allows Lou Dobbs, Kellyanne Conway, Kayleigh McEnany, Tucker Carlson, Glenn Beck and god knows how many other far right personalities launch their careers on their airwaves be "Left"? And, that is not even counting all the Far Right "contributors" they give voice to who say the damnedest of stupid things unchallenged on the station or in their op ed section.CNN - Bias and Credibility
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording
CNN is slightly Left of Center at most.
LOL, sure. “Moderate” meaning they agree with you, right?
Unbelievable.
Weak, very, very weak
lol...I decided to check out a few news sources this morning on the Media Bias fact check site and found myself rather amused.
First, they call the Economist "least biased," and they plop it dead-center on the left-right continuum.
Well, hate to say but the Economist leans right. It's factual for sure, but their bias is always pro-business, which by definition is Right.The Economist - Bias and Credibility
LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion
They seem to be on target with the Wall Street Journal, calling it to the right of center-right.
Wall Street Journal - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words
And, they nail it with Fox, pushing it toward the extreme Right.
Fox News (foxnews.com) - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
But, they totally blow it on CNN, WaPo and NYT.
Left-Center? Hmmm....I see more Center-Right in those pages.New York Times - Bias and Credibility
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording
Washington post is not left-center. They are dead center. Certainly they are more center than the Economist.Washington Post - Bias and Credibility
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording
CNN is not "Left." How on earth can a source that allows Lou Dobbs, Kellyanne Conway, Kayleigh McEnany, Tucker Carlson, Glenn Beck and god knows how many other far right personalities launch their careers on their airwaves be "Left"? And, that is not even counting all the Far Right "contributors" they give voice to who say the damnedest of stupid things unchallenged on the station or in their op ed section.CNN - Bias and Credibility
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording
CNN is slightly Left of Center at most.
www.justfactsdaily.com
There was a time when CNN was a reliable reporter of news facts - especially about foreign issues. That time belongs to the ancient past. Those names you cited were there during that era - they detected the moral shift in the tenor of the 'new age' of "journalism" and left - or were squeezed out by the new dogma.
And here we have the sum total of your intellectual capacity.
Did you not read my statement? OR did you simple not understand it?
