- Joined
- Jul 14, 2006
- Messages
- 1,390
- Reaction score
- 328
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Macon.com | 04/11/2007 | McConnell seeks to boost U.S. spy powers
My favorite quote from the article:
Comments?
I think personally this IS pushing it past reason.
WASHINGTON --President Bush's spy chief is pushing to expand the government's surveillance authority at the same time the administration is under attack for stretching its domestic eavesdropping powers.
National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell has circulated a draft bill that would expand the government's powers under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, liberalizing how that law can be used.
According to officials familiar with the draft changes to FISA, McConnell wants to:
-Give the NSA the power to monitor foreigners without seeking FISA court approval, even if the surveillance is conducted by tapping phones and e-mail accounts in the United States.
"Determinations about whether a court order is required should be based on considerations about the target of the surveillance, rather than the particular means of communication or the location from which the surveillance is being conducted," NSA Director Keith Alexander told the Senate last year.
-Clarify the standards the FBI and NSA must use to get court orders for basic information about calls and e-mails - such as the number dialed, e-mail address, or time and date of the communications. Civil liberties advocates contend the change will make it too easy for the government to access this information.
-Triple the life span of a FISA warrant for a non-U.S. citizen from 120 days to one year, allowing the government to monitor much longer without checking back in with a judge.
-Give telecommunications companies immunity from civil liability for their cooperation with Bush's terrorist surveillance program. Pending lawsuits against companies including Verizon and AT&T allege they violated privacy laws by giving phone records to the NSA for the program.
-Extend from 72 hours to one week the amount of time the government can conduct surveillance without a court order in emergencies.
My favorite quote from the article:
The court-approved surveillance could include planting listening devices and hidden cameras, searching luggage and breaking into homes to make copies of computer hard drives.
Comments?
I think personally this IS pushing it past reason.