- Joined
- Mar 6, 2005
- Messages
- 7,536
- Reaction score
- 429
- Location
- Upper West Side of Manhattan (10024)
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/03/world/middleeast/03mccain.html?hpMcCain Wrong on Iraq Security, Merchants Say
By KIRK SEMPLE - The New York Times
Published: April 3, 2007
BAGHDAD, April 2 — A day after members of an American Congressional delegation led by Senator John McCain pointed to their brief visit to Baghdad’s central market as evidence that the new security plan for the city was working, the merchants there were incredulous about the Americans’ conclusions.
“What are they talking about?” Ali Jassim Faiyad, the owner of an electrical appliances shop in the market, said Monday. “The security procedures were abnormal!”
The delegation arrived at the market, which is called Shorja, on Sunday with more than 100 soldiers in armored Humvees — the equivalent of an entire company — and attack helicopters circled overhead, a senior American military official in Baghdad said. The soldiers redirected traffic from the area and restricted access to the Americans, witnesses said, and sharpshooters were posted on the roofs. The congressmen wore bulletproof vests throughout their hourlong visit.
At a news conference shortly after their outing, Mr. McCain, an Arizona Republican, and his three Congressional colleagues described Shorja as a safe, bustling place full of hopeful and warmly welcoming Iraqis — “like a normal outdoor market in Indiana in the summertime,” offered Representative Mike Pence, an Indiana Republican who was a member of the delegation.
But the market that the congressmen said they saw is fundamentally different from the market Iraqis know.
Why is that so many Republican politicians are unable to tell the TRUTH? Why must they regularly make up $hit about Iraq? Every time they do it ends up with their $hit hitting the fan. Remember last week when Bush Brown Nose Senator McCain made the outrageous claim that there are some very safe parts of Baghdad where you could walk around without fear? No one believed him then but then McCain and his Congressional butt buddies went to Iraq and again defied the truth and made $hit up! How dumb is it to do that with the media around to expose the truth? DUH!
When will the lies end? The American people deserve the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Maybe because they're so used to lying these dirtballs are incapable of just telling the truth.
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/03/world/middleeast/03mccain.html?hp
Why is that so many Republican politicians are unable to tell the TRUTH? Why must they regularly make up $hit about Iraq? Every time they do it ends up with their $hit hitting the fan. Remember last week when Bush Brown Nose Senator McCain made the outrageous claim that there are some very safe parts of Baghdad where you could walk around without fear? No one believed him then but then McCain and his Congressional butt buddies went to Iraq and again defied the truth and made $hit up! How dumb is it to do that with the media around to expose the truth? DUH!
When will the lies end? The American people deserve the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Maybe because they're so used to lying these dirtballs are incapable of just telling the truth.
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/03/world/middleeast/03mccain.html?hp
It's just so flat out dumb to suggest that it's "safe" in Baghdad! It's also so weird to say that yet wear a bulletproof vest...and did they think that no one would notice the copters, 100 soldiers and that the entire area was closed to everyone but Americans?I don't pay much attention to what McCain says anymore.
There was a time where I actually had some respect for the man. Even being a Liberal, I found McCain somewhat palatable. That was until he started pandering to the right-wing wackjobs and started saying all these stupid things.
I couldn't believe it when I read this latest fiasco. Even the staunchest of Bush supporters (save a few) won't go as far as to say they would feel perfectly safe walking down the streets of Bagdhad.
Although I feel kind of bad for McCain doing the whole Howard Dean implosion thing. Dean was a decent guy....he just wasn't a great politician.....I think (?)I can say the same about McCain.
McCain lost to bush in 2000... do you have any idea how badly many republicans wanted something better?
We didn't choose bush because he's more right wing, we chose him because he's at least consistent. McCain changes his opinion with the tides, the seasons, or whatever he thinks is fashionable at the moment. He also almost joined the democrats in 2003-4... which is likely why you found him paletable. Much as I for example find Lieberman plaetable.
McCain is a republican version of Lieberman... only I think Lierberman is a much better guy... Lieberman is far more consistent then McCain.
If he had any integrity he would simply be the candidate he once was rather than butt fuc%ing with James Dobson, Jerry Falwell and the rest of that slimy crew.
This post makes a couple of excellent points. I never really thought of it the way that you posed it....but it makes sense. I can't stand Lieberman. I thought he was a bad choice when Gore picked him in 2000....and with the comparison that you make....I can see now why many Republicans might have issues with McCain.
Although....I ever really saw McCain as inconsistent until the last year or so....maybe I just never saw it. But his latest shifts to try to appease all has really hurt his chances.
Look....I am all for someone who is a bridge gapper. That is how Bush sold himself....and he's proven to be the most savvy wedge-issue politician in the history of this country. Despite my own personal choices for President, I think that America really needs someone who can bring this country together....and that is why I will be doing some heavy reflection over the next two years. I'm not sure who that candidate is. I doubt highly that it is McCain....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?