>Isn't that called perjury in which the average citizen can be charged with a felony for. As I have stated before the major problem I had with Clinton is his perjury as well as his speech to the American people in which he said " i have never had sexual relations with that woman". <
There are different types of perjury.
There's perjury in which you're attempting to hurt someone..such as, "I saw him kill," when you know this isn't true, and there's self-defense perjury, in which a witness can simply say, "Not guilty," when he knows, deep inside that he is guilty of the crime of which he is accused.
I defy you to show me any court case in which someone is prosecuted for self-defense perjury.
It never happens. This kind of perjury happens everyday in every court in the nation and is never prosecuted.
One more point, when Clinton was first questioned, he was asked if he had "sexual relations" with Monica.
Clinton asked for the panel's definition of "sexual relations," and the panel basically described it as the "'ol in-out."
Based on the panel's own defintion, Clinton told the truth, since it was never proven that the relationship went as far as intercourse. ( it's not Clinton's fault if he was smarter than anyone on the panel..LOL)
Again, I'm not supporting Clinton in his lie, but the fact remains, he was placed between a rock and a hard place...he either admits sexual indiscretions, or lies, to protect his wife, daughter, and yes, even himself from embarrassment that never should've come to this point based on the reasons stated in my previous post.
Hey, the republicans had to get him on something, didn't they? You should all feel proud.
Hoot