Matthews, Buchanan slam neocons for Mideast 'warmongering' (1 Viewer)

[danarhea]

In his latest column, Pat Buchanan lashed out at the Bush administration, saying that the collective punishment on innocent civilians in Lebanon was "un-American and un-Christian."

He may be right. What WOULD Jesus do?

On MSNBC, Buchanan also characterized the Neocons as "warmongers". Chris Matthews agreed.

From this article.

 

[Goobieman]

In his latest column, Pat Buchanan lashed out at the Bush administration, saying that the collective punishment on innocent civilians in Lebanon was "un-American and un-Christian."

Well then, that settles it.

We must allow Israel to do whatever she wants.

After all, if we were to restrain them, because it is the Christian way, we would be in violation of the Establishment clause -- at least according to Ifuh.

He may be right. What WOULD Jesus do?

Whatever it is, according to Ifuh, if we do it, then we violate the Establishment clause. So, whatever it is, we canlt do it.

Except for the Welfare state -- that;s Christian Charity, but it is, somehow, OK.

 

[danarhea]

Well then, that settles it.

We must allow Israel to do whatever she wants.

After all, if we were to restrain them, because it is the Christian way, we would be in violation of the Establishment clause -- at least according to Ifuh.


Whatever it is, according to Ifuh, if we do it, then we violate the Establishment clause. So, whatever it is, we canlt do it.

Except for the Welfare state -- that;s Christian Charity, but it is, somehow, OK.

You actually believe that Pat Buchanan would support a welfare state? :rofl. Oh yea, and I am a Liberal too, right? :rofl.

I think your problem is, that with your educational level, you dont seem to understand that there is a difference between Liberalism and Libertarianism. And Buchanan? He is a dyed in the wool Conservative, in case you didnt know, and I bet you didnt. :rofl

 

[Goobieman]

You actually believe that Pat Buchanan would support a welfare state?

What makes you think I said that?

I think your problem is, that with your educational level, you dont seem to understand that there is a difference between Liberalism and Libertarianism.

I think your problem is, that with your educational level, and perhaps because of it, you missed my point.

 

[Kandahar]

In his latest column, Pat Buchanan lashed out at the Bush administration, saying that the collective punishment on innocent civilians in Lebanon was "un-American and un-Christian."

Well considering that Israel is neither American nor Christian, I don't think that insult carries a lot of weight. :roll:

He may be right. What WOULD Jesus do?

Probably not this. But then, that sissy bitch got crucified.

On MSNBC, Buchanan also characterized the Neocons as "warmongers". Chris Matthews agreed.

First of all, your premise is wrong. You don't have to be a neocon to support "warmongering" in the Middle East at the present time. I have always been extremely skeptical of Bush's adventure in Iraq and his desire to bring democracy to the region, but I fully support America and Israel's rights to defend themselves.

Israel has every right to attack Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria, Iran, and whoever else is threatening them.

 

[danarhea]

What makes you think I said that?


I think your problem is, that with your educational level, and perhaps because of it, you missed my point.

Hehe. I like the way you infer something, by posting something like this:

Except for the Welfare state -- that;s Christian Charity, but it is, somehow, OK.

And then deny you said it because you only inferred it.

:rofl

 

[Goobieman]

Hehe. I like the way you infer something, by posting something like this:
And then deny you said it because you only inferred it.
:rofl

You think you're far more clever than you really are.

The ENTIRE purpose of my post was to illustrate the absurdity of Ihu'f usual argument. Nothing you've posted in response has anythng to do with the intent of my post.