• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Matt Gaetz Releases Statement from Nameless ‘Women’ Defending His Honor

You forgot the part about how the democratic hoax investigation started during the trump administration.
No he's got that covered. It was the evil FBI, which is known to be evil because Peter Strozk was in the FBI during Trump's administration.
 
I know that adjective bothers some people but they have earned it. Despite people thinking this is a new phenomena with them, its not.

Dan Rather lied about Bush's service record trying to sabotage his election.

Reid lied about Romneys taxes and the media never challenged it. They also said Romney drove away with tje family dog on the roof.

Savanna Guthrie selectivly edited tape to mislead viewers in a gun debate.

60 minutes just did the same thing to Desantis

They pushed the false claim of hands up dont shoot

They lied about the high school kid from covenigton

PBS just admitted that the claim that they never confirmed that hunters laptop was determined by us intelligence as russian disinformation.

I can go on and on with examples and all of them coicidentally always promote progressive politics. The Baizuo media has earned that title.

Who do I trust in the media....
Not many, sadly
Sharyl Attkins seems to be ovjective

Howie Kurtz seems pretty fair

Jamie Dupree I like a lot because you really can not tell if he perfers one party over the other. His reporting is straight down the middle.
I agree with you on Howard Kurtz, used to watch him on CNN a few years ago, and have watched a few of his shows on fox.
I'm not familiar with the others you named, I'll have to check them out. Thank you.
 
I agree with you on Howard Kurtz, used to watch him on CNN a few years ago, and have watched a few of his shows on fox.
I'm not familiar with the others you named, I'll have to check them out. Thank you.
When FOX wants to look respectable, they hire somebody from CNN
 
"I spent hours with him and he hardly raped me once!"

If they were working in his office, they were too old for him!
****, please don't make me laugh that hard again until I at least get my second shot.
 
Quick side question: Does he have family working at his office?
 
That it's politically motivated.
I did not claim that. I did not rule it out. I raised it as a possibility. Its also a possibility that its a good faith investigation but Gaetz isn't guility or even being investigated of what the media is accusing him of.

The only conclusion I have drawn is that the NYT lacks the credibility to be trusted on blind faith.
 
Cuomo hasn't been accused of pressuring anyone for sex that I know of, or having sex, with anyone. He just needs to keep his hands to himself.

He was sexually harassing women in his employ, that's enough for me to think he is a scum bag.
 
What the hell!!! This is something an eight grader would try to pull off. I can only hope that nameless 'the women of Congressman Matt Gaetz's office' feel dragged in on his ridiculous scheme in order to make himself look like an angel. Seriously, there should be repercussions by his office women as this investigation/case moves forward to his conviction if and when found guilty.

Matt Gaetz Releases Statement from Nameless ‘Women’ Defending His Honor (msn.com)
View attachment 67327489
“After the shocking allegations last week in the press, we, the women of Congressman Matt Gaetz’s office, feel morally obligated to speak out,” the statement began. “During Congressman Gaetz’s time in office, we have been behind the scenes every step of the way. We have staffed his meetings. We have planned his events. We have traveled with him. And we have tracked his schedule. Congressman Gaetz has always been a principled and morally grounded leader. At no time has any one of us experienced or witnessed anything less than the utmost professionalism and respect. No hint of impropriety. No ounce of untruthfulness.”


The press release continued: “In our office and under Congressman Gaetz’s leadership, women are not only respected, but have been encouraged time and time again to grow, achieve more, and ultimately, know our value. Many of us started in entry-level positions and have been promoted to positions of leadership within the office. In our professional ecosystem, women are given every opportunity to advance and utilize our talents to help the country in the best possible way. On every occasion he has treated each and every one of us with respect. Thus, we uniformly reject these allegations as false. Congressman Gaetz will continue to lead by example and stand for the people of America who have been maligned by the liberal elite. And we will stand with him. While we recognize the scrutiny we will face for making this decision, we take comfort in the hope that more Americans and elected officials will stand up and refuse to remain silent.”
It’s funny she is nameless. Does she even exist? Also, he is not accused to sexually assaulting or abusing the women working under him.
 
It’s funny she is nameless. Does she even exist? Also, he is not accused to sexually assaulting or abusing the women working under him.


But shirley the fact that he hasn't jumped the bones of his office workers means he's not a paedophile? Or something..
 
It’s funny she is nameless. Does she even exist? Also, he is not accused to sexually assaulting or abusing the women working under him.
True that. It's as if this blanket statement that supposedly came from all of his female office workers spend all of their free time around him - where he travels - and inside the rooms where he is bangin' the headboards. These "office women" should grow a pair and make one simple small statement to the news that detaches them from supposedly applauding his despicable private life. Their statement should go like this. 'I did not sign my name to any such statement'. That's all they would need to say.
 
NYT isn't credible. They are nothing but 1 of a group of Baizuo gossip columns that masquerade as news.

Every time you people post ridiculous sources like Zerohedge or Breitbart or Newsmax, you whine about liberals "attacking the source."
 
If you don't care if the allegation is true or not and your just happy someone you don't like is being smeared even if its based on a lie, that speaks volumes about the kind of person you are.

Do you realize you've set up a situation where you will basically assume every single sexual assault allegation is false?
 
Quick side question: Does he have family working at his office?
I have wondered that myself and unfortunately do not know the answer to that. I hope reporters dig deeper into his office workers with a couple of questions.
 
Every time you people post ridiculous sources like Zerohedge or Breitbart or Newsmax, you whine about liberals "attacking the source."
I do not accept unnamed sources from any of them as credible either. Your attempt at whataboutism is an abject failure.
 
Do you realize you've set up a situation where you will basically assume every single sexual assault allegation is false?
No I dont realize that and I am not gonna suspend the burden of proof for accusers because the woke crowd think we should.
 
No I dont realize that and I am not gonna suspend the burden of proof for accusers because the woke crowd think we should.

What would constitute proof?
 
If you accept unnamed sources from the Baizuo media you should also accept them from their targets. I dont give either credence.
Still trying to flog your new word, hilarious.
 
If you accept unnamed sources from the Baizuo media you should also accept them from their targets. I dont give either credence.

You have yet to name one actual thing you would accept. Does it literally have to happen on video?
 
Still trying to flog your new word, hilarious.

But it is an interesting term. And to see what it refers to expressed by another people, is also interesting.
"...a sarcastic reference to those whose political opinions are perceived as being guided by emotions or a hypocritical show of selflessness and empathy."
That might even leave a mark . . .
(Chinese: 白左; pinyin: báizuǒ, Mandarin pronunciation: [pǎi.tswò], literally White Left)[1][2] is a Chinese neologism and political epithet used to refer to Western leftist ideologies primarily espoused by white leftists.[3] The term baizuo is related to the term shèngmǔ (simplified Chinese: 圣母; traditional Chinese: 聖母; pinyin: shèngmǔ, literally "Blessed Mother") or shèngmǔbiǎo (simplified Chinese: 圣母婊; traditional Chinese: 聖母婊; pinyin: shèngmǔbiǎo, literally "Blessed Mother of Bitch"), a sarcastic reference to those whose political opinions are perceived as being guided by emotions or a hypocritical show of selflessness and empathy.[4][5]

History
The term baizuo was apparently coined in a 2010 article published on Renren Network by user Li Shuo, entitled The Fake Morality of the Western White Left and the Chinese Patriotic Scientists (simplified Chinese: 西方白左和中国爱国科学家的伪道德; traditional Chinese: 西方白左和中國愛國科學家的偽道德; pinyin: Xīfāng báizuǒ hé zhōngguó àiguó kēxuéjiā de wěidàodé), initially used as a general critique of certain socialist values in the American left.[3] No further use of the term is known until 2013, where it enjoyed prominence in the Chinese forum Zhihu through 2013–2015.
 
Back
Top Bottom