Name calling will get you penalized.Since you are too stupid to figure it out:
because Mar-a-Lago is an UNSECURED facility not designed to hold classified , nuclear related info. The FBI is a secure facility!
Dd you get it now?
Stop pretending you don't understand how silly your argument it.Stop deflecting. Why are you concerned about Mar-a-Lago not being an SCI storage facility when the only leak involving the documents came from the FBI?
The DOJ doesn’t seem to think so.So you don't understand that it was a crime for Trump to have them stored at his resort?
Or you just won't be honest because it hurts your defense of Trump?
HahahahThe DOJ doesn’t seem to think so.
You’re mistaking them with the tabloid public relations types in right wing media.
The Post never prints anything that doesn’t have confirmation.
Fox seldom bothers, and, even now is trying to avoid liability in the Dominion lawsuit by claiming that they were simply reporting what someone else was saying (thereby passing it off as fact without bothering to check). But then, that is SOP there.
do you understand the SS is only there to protect Trump and nothing else?What Trump did was keep documents in a box in a storage room in a building that is guarded 24/7 by the secret service. That’s what you have on him vs the FBI abusing their security clearance to leak classified information to the press after seizing those documents.
Of course they think so. They even listed the probable cause and the criminal code in the warrent.The DOJ doesn’t seem to think so.
Sure you do... run every Post link thru the bottom (black) search box in the page here https://archive.ph
and view an archived image of the article, https://archive.ph/j8zNQ
"...
In an interview that aired Friday, former Trump attorney general William P. Barr said there is no reason classified documents should have been at Mar-a-Lago after Trump was out of office.
“People say this was unprecedented,” Barr told Fox News. “But it’s also unprecedented for a president to take all this classified information and put them in a country club, okay?”
3002 Comments
TDS patients:
Only care about compromising national security if the person leaking classified information is Trump. Otherwise ignore the factual evidence-based leak of classified information and focus on innuendo about Trump and what might have been.
The existence of the documents in question is classified. Not just the contents.You confuse a leak related to criminal investigation with compromising nuclear related top secret information stored in someone's basement.
It is not secret that there are nuclear related files, so a leak that acknowledges such file existence does not compromise any nuclear classified info!
TDS patients:
Only care about compromising national security if the person leaking classified information is Trump. Otherwise ignore the factual evidence-based leak of classified information and focus on innuendo about Trump and what might have been.
Exactly.You confuse a leak related to criminal investigation with compromising nuclear related top secret information stored in someone's basement.
It is not secret that there are nuclear related files, so a leak that acknowledges such file existence does not compromise any nuclear classified info!
The existence of the documents in question is classified. Not just the contents.
Their justification for the allegation is redacted. And they haven’t charged him with the crime you are describing despite having seized the documents a month ago.Of course they think so. They even listed the probable cause and the criminal code in the warrent.
Have you been under a rock?
Let's include the title:
Material on foreign nation’s nuclear capabilities seized at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
Which countries? Why?
.
Why would he have nuclear secrets about other countries?
Wrong.Only you say such thing!
It is NO secret that nuclear related documents exist.
Only the uneducated can say that they do not know that we have such documents!
Maybe that's because the criminal investigation is still ongoing.... because it is.Their justification for the allegation is redacted. And they haven’t charged him with the crime you are describing despite having seized the documents a month ago.
The criminal codes they have cause to believe he violated were not redacted.Their justification for the allegation is redacted. And they haven’t charged him with the crime you are describing despite having seized the documents a month ago.
I think you folks are as delusional as the people who thought Hillary would be put away forever…this time.Maybe that's because the criminal investigation is still ongoing.... because it is.
Do you not realize you have been stumping for the court decision that just stopped it in its tracks?
I mean ... wtf
In the absurd situation of a nuclear war how do allies coordinate actions without shared information?
I am not aware of any nuclear crises during Trump's administration why would he even need such information in thr oval office?
That was a very bizarre and inappropriate response to my post.I think you folks are as delusional as the people who though Hillary would be put away forever…this time.
What this leak proves is that the DOJ can’t be trusted with possession of the documents. It turns out that, despite all of the innuendo and partisan hackery surrounding this issue, the real leaker and mishandler of classified documents in this whole saga is the DOJ. All the more reason to select a neutral third party to review.That was a very bizarre and inappropriate response to my post.
You have been stumping all day for the court decision that stopped the criminal investigation in it tracks.
'He hasn't been charged with anything.'
Hmm, I wonder why not? I mean... some things just can't be known, I guess...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?