- Joined
- Jul 9, 2018
- Messages
- 6,976
- Reaction score
- 2,672
- Location
- Boston Massachusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Where I live, most of the residents are still out of work.
Sorry to hear that.
Where I live, most of the residents are still out of work.
Sorry to hear that.
It's spooky. I live in an apartment complex that used to be 2/3 rds empty during the day that's 2/3 rds full now. Maybe some are working from home though.
You said Asians wear it all the time, which is wrong.
Here's the clip of what Dr. Fauci said back in March:
At the beginning he said "The masks are important, for someone who is infected to prevent them from infecting someone else." When he says later in the clip that "It [masks] might even block a droplet, but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think it is", he's talking about how masks do not offer the wearer of the mask much protection, not that it doesn't offer protection to other people from the infected person wearing the mask. He later changed his stance for two reasons:
Here's a video of Fauci saying exactly this in July: https://www.washingtonpost.com/vide...9264e2-0f35-4862-aca2-2b4702650a8b_video.html
- At the time there was a PPE shortage, so he was discouraging healthy people from wearing them in order to save them for the people (healthcare providers and people who are ill) that really needed them.
- Later on in the pandemic it became known that a lot of asymptomatic people were spreading the virus, so it became important for even healthy people to wear masks to prevent them from unknowingly infecting other people.
Nope. Don’t work. He lied. Masks don’t mysterio go from blocking one droplet to 95%. I gave you the reason why. You want to ignore what the idiot said.
Nope. He mentioned nothing about any fear of any mask shortage. That was his excuse when the leftists said “What are we gonna do, doc?”I'm not ignoring what he said, I'm just choosing to take everything he said into account. It's pretty clear in the interview that at the time he thought healthcare workers and the ill should be wearing masks, but the general public should not because at the time there was a PPE shortage and there weren't any known benefits for healthy people to wear them. His statement that masks might block a droplet doesn't change his overall message, and the message that the majority of experts and healthcare workers have been saying, which is that masks are a necessary and effective measure to prevent the spread of covid.
Nope. He mentioned nothing about any fear of any mask shortage. That was his excuse when the leftists said “What are we gonna do, doc?”
Interviewer said:But it can lead to a shortage of masks.
Dr. Fauci said:Exactly, that's the point. It could lead to a shortage of masks for the people who really need it.
Don’t work. He said CLOTH masks were just as good. Besides if he is talking about medical masks how come he said they only stop one droplet? A shortage of masks that stop one droplet? Really?
Interviewer said:And hopefully they would get a better mask than the drug store sells?
Dr. Fauci said:Right, the drug store masks they sell have a lot of loopholes in them that let the virus through.
I rewatched the video I posted and I can't find where he said that cloth masks were just as good. Here's another video from February that seems to contradict this:
If Dr. Fauci believes that drug store masks aren't as effective as medical masks, I'm not sure he would believe homemade cloth ones would be either. If you have a clip of him saying otherwise feel free to post.
And again, I know he stated that masks might stop a droplet (I'm not really sure what he was trying to get at here), but I'm choosing to look at his overall message and it's pretty clear that at the time he thought that it was important for healthcare workers and the ill to wear masks to prevent the spread of covid. I don't think he would recommend them to anyone if they weren't effective.
Ok. Let’s assume he was fearful of a shortage. What type masks was he referring to that may stop one droplet? IOW, was he steering people away from medical masks do there wouldn’t be a run on them? If so, he was lying, wasn’t he?
Nope. Don’t work. He lied. Masks don’t mysterio go from blocking one droplet to 95%. I gave you the reason why. You want to ignore what the idiot said.
Your hero says you are lucky if they stop a droplet.Nope, sorry. Wear a mask, social distance, and wash your hands. Or, move to a cabin in the woods.
Masking was for political reason. Normalcy was coming with summer. We couldn't let that happen. Masks are to maintain the fear
From my family living here in Raleigh, 4 out of the 6 adults are working from home. 3 of the 4 in my household, and 1 in the other household, which is an apartment. While I do understand that a lot of people lost their jobs, there are many that simply converted to at home work.It's spooky. I live in an apartment complex that used to be 2/3 rds empty during the day that's 2/3 rds full now. Maybe some are working from home though.
Didn't Johnson just extend the furlough scheme?Here it's the "unskilled" that are bearing the brunt of layoffs and furloughs though furlough support funding just ended, so the layoffs will rise. Working from home tends to be a middle-class option for the desk drivers.
Didn't Johnson just extend the furlough scheme?
Evening Express The Press and Journal combined
About the new Press and Journal and Evening Express combined website Our newspapers Press and Journal subscribers Evening Express subscribers Eveningwww.eveningexpress.co.uk
From my family living here in Raleigh, 4 out of the 6 adults are working from home. 3 of the 4 in my household, and 1 in the other household, which is an apartment. While I do understand that a lot of people lost their jobs, there are many that simply converted to at home work.
Ok. Let’s assume he was fearful of a shortage. What type masks was he referring to that may stop one droplet? IOW, was he steering people away from medical masks do there wouldn’t be a run on them? If so, he was lying, wasn’t he?
Seriously he said that?Yes, his U turn package was just announced.
Five weeks ago, Prof Whitty (our Fauci) recommended a short national lockdown.
Four weeks ago Johnson said no way, and introduced a complicated local "tiers" system. Whitty, standing beside him at the podium essentially said it wouldn't work!
Yesterday, Johnson announced a month's national lockdown.
Today Ian Duncan Smith (a right wing Tory who led Johnson's premiership campaign) complained the Johnson had "Given in to science!"
Seriously he said that?
Wow! Seems you have your own trumptards over thereOh yes. Completely in character!
Iain Duncan Smith Claims Government Has 'Given In To Science' Over Lockdown
The former minister said the country was "impersonating the Grand Old Duke of York".www.huffingtonpost.co.uk
That would be Faust, aka: Dr. Fauci, who said that medical masks might stop just one droplet and not a one of you knows why he said that. He was NOT talking about cloth masks that stop just one droplet. He was saying medical masks suck. Yet, he was worried about the public snatching up masks that he himself stop just a drople?This isn't very difficult. Anyone that should be listened to is saying mask up. Anyone whose head is you know where is saying don't bother. Now you chose. Get it?