Says who? You? Because you said so? Nonsense. I do not have to do what you demand because you say so. That is an asinine statement. I do not have to to present more than scientific opinion which is based on the evidence because “you said so,” anymore than a person insisting gravity exists has to present non-scientific opinion or evidence for gravity’s existence because someone said so.
Just because you personally demand it doesn’t mean jack squat. This is just another irrational attempt to recreate the burden for people on nothing more than your personal opinion.
I do not have to present one person infected infected in the specific manner you demand just because you say so.
And I repeat my prior remarks of why your claim makes little sense. It is sensible, rational, to take precautions to minimize an undesirous outcome which can develop. Where the physical evidence supports the existence of risk some consequence can occur, it isn’t necessary to wait until a documented consequence occurs, as it is rational to act upon the risk which exists based on the physical evidence. Especially where the risk for some can be death, and an increased risk of death.
This is applicable to masks and the context of an infected person not wearing a mask around someone wearing a mask that isn’t N-95.
Viral particles are microscopic. They attach to saliva, spit, water droplets from the mouth, and aerosols, which are also small and range from visible to not detectable with the human eyes. Some can be suspended in the air and can be moved around in a room by air currents, such as from an AC. See Chinese epidemiological study of one woman infected 9 others in restaurant based in part to the AC moving the viral air particles around the room on her side of the restaurant.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7/20-0764_article
The mask, except for N95 masks, leave openings on the face. The virus and the small particles carrying it are small enough to pass through the openings between the mask and face. “Masks, depending on type, filter out the majority of viral particles, but not all.”
https://m.box.com/shared_item/https://ucsf.app.box.com/s/blvolkp5z0mydzd82rjks4wyleagt036
That is a rational reason for both people in the hypo and all people to wear a mask. There is no logical reason mentioned as to why that is insufficient for universal masking.
There is no evidence, or argument, yet again, from you illuminating how your claim “mask mandates do not work” is believable. Your claim is literally the equivalent to the flat earth people claiming the earth is flat, as both share a dubious common denominator, no supporting evidence or sound argument.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk