• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Marjorie Taylor Greene removed from committee assignments by a vote of 230-199

Excast

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 22, 2019
Messages
5,298
Reaction score
10,580
Location
New Jersey
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
11 Republicans joined with the Democratic majority to remove Greene from her positions on the Budget and Education committees.

House votes to remove Marjorie Taylor Greene from committee assignments

The House voted Thursday evening to remove Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene from her committee assignments, a decisive step that comes in the wake of recently unearthed incendiary and violent past statements from the congresswoman that have triggered widespread backlash from Democrats and...
www.cnn.com

Just a reminder that this is 50 fewer Republicans than who voted to strip Liz Cheney from her leadership position yesterday for daring to hold Trump accountable. For them, defending the Capitol against an insurrection is more of a crime than supporting the assassination of the Speaker of the House.

MGT loses, but it is still her party.
 
only eleven Republicans voted to remove the antisemitic space laser 9/11 truther Q anon conspiracy nut lady from committee assignments. nothing should surprise me after they gave the "you're fired" idiot the nuclear codes, but i guess that it still kind of does.
 

1 more than who voted to impeach.

Progress?
 
Excast said:
1 more than who voted to impeach.

Progress?
Click to expand...

i just don't see that brand as redeemable. i mean, they're going to let the mango mistake get away with fomenting an insurrection, too. i just don't see how even in fifty years an analytical person would be able to say, "well, they did have a bit of a nutty period there, but look at all of the good they did after that!"

nope.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…