• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Maoism saved Nepal from an absolute monarchy

Ganapathy

Banned
Joined
Jul 11, 2016
Messages
500
Reaction score
62
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Socialist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2o_fOQNIts

This is a documentary from 2003, in the middle of the Nepali Civil War. Nepal was currently being ruled by a dictatorial king called Gyanendra, who kept the common citizen in a state of abject poverty while he enjoyed all the luxuries he wanted. Opposing him was a Maoist people's Army, fighting for the rights of the poor common citizens.

Fortunately, in 2008, the Maoists won the war. since that day, Nepal has been a democracy, a flawed, sometimes corrupt one, but a democracy nonetheless.

The video I posted, while definitely having a tinge of western capitalist bias, still does a very good job of showing the poverty that most Nepali citizens suffered while under the rule of their absolute monarch, and the bravely of the Maoist forces fighting to better their lives.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2o_fOQNIts

This is a documentary from 2003, in the middle of the Nepali Civil War. Nepal was currently being ruled by a dictatorial king called Gyanendra, who kept the common citizen in a state of abject poverty while he enjoyed all the luxuries he wanted. Opposing him was a Maoist people's Army, fighting for the rights of the poor common citizens.

Fortunately, in 2008, the Maoists won the war. since that day, Nepal has been a democracy, a flawed, sometimes corrupt one, but a democracy nonetheless.

The video I posted, while definitely having a tinge of western capitalist bias, still does a very good job of showing the poverty that most Nepali citizens suffered while under the rule of their absolute monarch, and the bravely of the Maoist forces fighting to better their lives.

Nepal lol

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2o_fOQNIts

This is a documentary from 2003, in the middle of the Nepali Civil War. Nepal was currently being ruled by a dictatorial king called Gyanendra, who kept the common citizen in a state of abject poverty while he enjoyed all the luxuries he wanted. Opposing him was a Maoist people's Army, fighting for the rights of the poor common citizens.

Fortunately, in 2008, the Maoists won the war. since that day, Nepal has been a democracy, a flawed, sometimes corrupt one, but a democracy nonetheless.

The video I posted, while definitely having a tinge of western capitalist bias, still does a very good job of showing the poverty that most Nepali citizens suffered while under the rule of their absolute monarch, and the bravely of the Maoist forces fighting to better their lives.

What a quaintly and transparently pathetic lie.

No, Maoism didn't do that. The first democratic elections were held in 1991, and had zero to do with Maoism or Maoist rebels.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2o_fOQNIts

This is a documentary from 2003, in the middle of the Nepali Civil War. Nepal was currently being ruled by a dictatorial king called Gyanendra, who kept the common citizen in a state of abject poverty while he enjoyed all the luxuries he wanted. Opposing him was a Maoist people's Army, fighting for the rights of the poor common citizens.

Fortunately, in 2008, the Maoists won the war. since that day, Nepal has been a democracy, a flawed, sometimes corrupt one, but a democracy nonetheless.

The video I posted, while definitely having a tinge of western capitalist bias, still does a very good job of showing the poverty that most Nepali citizens suffered while under the rule of their absolute monarch, and the bravely of the Maoist forces fighting to better their lives.




Like a man was saved from hanging by being shot dead.
 
What a quaintly and transparently pathetic lie.

No, Maoism didn't do that. The first democratic elections were held in 1991, and had zero to do with Maoism or Maoist rebels.

The first elections were in 1991, but after Gyanendra took power, he abolished them and restored the absolute monarchy
 
Back
Top Bottom