• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Many Lapses in Katrina Response

scottyz

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Moderate
Why didn't these "remedies" start after 9/11? Wasn't the whole point of DHS to streamline the process and help these agencies react better?

The administration likes to claim they are the only ones that can keep us safe after 9/11, but it would appear that claim is total bs. No terrorist is going to give us a couple day head start to prepare and even if they did we apparently still couldn't deal with it.

Blanco and Nagin who had the same advance warning also failed miserably to react. 56 hours of advance warning and they waited until there was only 19 hours till landfall to evacuate the areas.
What agenda did Mr. Brown have I wonder.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060215/ap_on_go_co/katrina_washington_24;_ylt=Ave4o_Q3_bx5mBsV5VUaoxcbLisB;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

So we have one claim that Bush was "highly engaged" in the response effort.


We have the House Reports claim that Bush didn't have much of a clue about what was happening.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060214/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/katrina_congress
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…