• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Manifestly Unfit

That’s mostly it. It has little to do with actual policy. He’s a prolific liar, and a bully. He’s good at using lawyers - what many of his people call ‘law fare’ to harass and intimidate people. The republicans have, for years, cheated by gerrymandering, and have been way better at that that the Dems. All things considered, it was almost a perfect storm that has allowed Trump back into the White House. He wants that power. Unfortunately, he doesn’t know how to do much good with it.
:rolleyes:
 
Here is the deal, I went to google and searched the election results for 2020 and 2024 for Georgia, North Carolina and Arizona. 3 states you picked. Rather than counter my statement that the vote counts were higher in 2024 in each state than in 2020, you went with the limp reply. Feel free to show that my statements were incorrect if you can, but you are manifestly unfit to do so.
Oh, personal attack because you still don't have anything to support your supposition. Why is that? Here's a small, small clue: check the population figures. Check the laws. I know, that's more complicated, but you know, facts.
 
Oh, personal attack because you still don't have anything to support your supposition. Why is that? Here's a small, small clue: check the population figures. Check the laws. I know, that's more complicated, but you know, facts.
If you can't take it, don't dish it out. You have an unexpressed theory, but no facts. Express your theory with facts and I'll point out the flaws of your argument. Don't worry, I won't be holding my breath for you to reply.
 
If you can't take it, don't dish it out. You have an unexpressed theory, but no facts. Express your theory with facts and I'll point out the flaws of your argument. Don't worry, I won't be holding my breath for you to reply.
Here's my reply: educate yourself so you'll stop embarrassing yourself. Your analysis has less depth than a light drizzle. I note, you still have provided no facts, just your own conclusions. I don't feel obliged to do your homework.
 
Last edited:
Here's my reply: educate yourself so you'll stop embarrassing yourself. Your analysis has less depth than a light drizzle. I note, you still have provided no facts, just your own conclusions. I don't feel obliged to do your homework.
Here is your bullshit, in case you forgot: "In some cases (NC, GA, AZ), Republican voter suppression efforts were successful."

Here are the numbers you requested, better get the equipment ready to move your goalposts.

I'll even include a link to my source since you never seem to remember how to include a source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election



2024​
2020​
DRTotalDRTotal
AZ1,582,8601,770,2423,390,1611,672,1431,661,6863,387,326
NC2,548,0172,663,1175,699,1452,684,2922,758,7755,524,804
GA2,715,3752,898,4235,250,0472,473,6332,461,8544,999,960
 
A few things here. Trump had 4 years of campaigning along with 4 years of allied media pushing his BS. Harris had just 100 days, was a black woman and for the most part unknown. She had no time to get a decent message going. Trump barely won with 1.5% of the popular vote. The only people he ever beat were two women, which have inherently been handicapped in American presidential politics.

So how well did Trump actually do?

Here's the problem:
You guys are blaming Americans for failing to live up to your ideals.

Imagine how badly Harris would have lost had the GOP nominated a guy without the personal baggage that he brought.
 
Here is your bullshit, in case you forgot: "In some cases (NC, GA, AZ), Republican voter suppression efforts were successful."

Here are the numbers you requested, better get the equipment ready to move your goalposts.

I'll even include a link to my source since you never seem to remember how to include a source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election



2024​
2020​
DRTotalDRTotal
AZ1,582,8601,770,2423,390,1611,672,1431,661,6863,387,326
NC2,548,0172,663,1175,699,1452,684,2922,758,7755,524,804
GA2,715,3752,898,4235,250,0472,473,6332,461,8544,999,960
For the educationally impaired and/or stubborn in this conversation... see if you can suss out the fundamental defect in your assertion...


That is my last response to your deflection posts. Basic math should be sufficient. Here's a hint: you may need to calculate percentages. If that's too difficult, the census has supplied them. I cannot be responsible for your lack of comprehension. I do appreciate, though, your willingness to prove my point, if inadvertently. Now, back to the actual topic of the thread...
 
For the educationally impaired and/or stubborn in this conversation... see if you can suss out the fundamental defect in your assertion...


That is my last response to your deflection posts. Basic math should be sufficient. Here's a hint: you may need to calculate percentages. If that's too difficult, the census has supplied them. I cannot be responsible for your lack of comprehension. I do appreciate, though, your willingness to prove my point, if inadvertently. Now, back to the actual topic of the thread...
Um, weren't you the one complaining about personal attacks just a few posts ago?
 
Something is going on across the US with the demographic shifts towards Trump that I can't get my head wrapped around. I was expecting a easy victory for Kamala but she way underperformed in a lot of voter blocks.

Obviously, the Democrats missed it as well............ ya know, the smartest people in the country?
 
Something is going on across the US with the demographic shifts towards Trump that I can't get my head wrapped around. I was expecting a easy victory for Kamala but she way underperformed in a lot of voter blocks.

Obviously, the Democrats missed it as well............ ya know, the smartest people in the country?
I'd call it a second honeymoon for Trump. He's not yet in a position where he's accountable for the nation's problems, but that will come soon enough.
 
This is the problem with demonizing the opposition to the degree the far left does. It creates incredibly awkward moments like where voters look at your candidate, and then they look at "Hitler," and then they chose "Hitler." There's just no way for the fringes of the American left to process that.
Oh come on! We've just had 4 years of Fox's constant dunning descriptions of a senile and incompetent Biden ruining a bustling economy and 6 months of how a promiscuous Ms. Harris traded sexual favors for cushy positions for which she was unqualified and preformed incompetently.

It is not demonizing to say that Trump lacks empathy, avoids responsibility, is involved in criminal behavior, is unethical, blames others, has a pathological need for attention. If you think the Democrats, during the campaign, should have been characterizing Trump as chaste, honest, youthful, experienced and qualified for the presidency I'm sure there are people willing to have that discussion with you. Frankly it is it is Republicans who are not processing the strange and unhealthy elements that are taking over their party.
 
I agree Trump is unfit for office, but just how bad are the Democrats at this point that they would lose so comprehensively to someone like that?

How bad Democrats are at this point:



 
This is the problem with demonizing the opposition to the degree the far left does. It creates incredibly awkward moments like where voters look at your candidate, and then they look at "Hitler," and then they chose "Hitler." There's just no way for the fringes of the American left to process that.

Sure there is. There have been plenty of other examples of people destroying their own country and future with corrupt, ignorant, evil leaders- and doing it with great enthusiasm and aplomb. America's experience with Trump will not be unprecedented:

AD_4nXf8_EdQgmHDjKkP0e9TlRLYdsLFCEVx0YP1zqu7erqLmxxejHEbcmk7mA5sgnogpHiMAwvwzpvZKwQeDgJdowrOAaEO5QNfZvsFOAYtjXepyytIGj5HkVExiYrqWMsYYOgHC6yAga-GC5c8zhKC88ezbGpM
AD_4nXchL1lwH-YoZ1UNZfPQizM-TkERWnQoUAbYRzO8abIhus9jLb8f_QqYaMc6QS7KKAd1QFRATc2wwxEbhSFbxMoY__wnJH_SMBtgw5Nr5XhXg3brxeWeJK8SKJz50XX29vyGY-sG_bJ7mbmFmG6yc2q8KOPY
AD_4nXf4nIZetF4bJROO13ZZ1Hx6xT8wdNG7XesU8Lqw3pevOlRJFTnLTGIT_Oy7XJ-DEHk6TOjbJakhI0cJCtlbHExXnrgrgaZ4RARqbTttYONrg0i6XDRSzaH_2FwWjcnFTP7gOleyN5IBFzIxl0IaSXKjgrI5
 
Democrats seem so disconnected from what voters want because of RWE messaging. They are clearly better at it. The problem is, it's all lies and misinformation. People are generally not that smart. When everyone starts losing benefits from the new RW agenda, the thing to remember is that the liberals fought for and for the most part got you those benefits.
 
Democrats seem so disconnected from what voters want because of RWE messaging. They are clearly better at it. The problem is, it's all lies and misinformation. People are generally not that smart. When everyone starts losing benefits from the new RW agenda, the thing to remember is that the liberals fought for and for the most part got you those benefits.
RWE messaging is responsible for the hole? I don't think so. Democrat apparatchiks are as skilled and talented as Republican apparatchiks, maybe more so. Any outsider who watched from start to finish a Trump rally probably slapped his forehead and gasped, "how could Hariss lose?"

The answer is shaping up to be as a whole the national Democratic Party moved too far to the extreme left too quickly and left middle America behind. Best that can happen now is over the next two years Trump's administration proves to be the ineffective government failure progressives hope it will be.
 
RWE messaging is responsible for the hole? I don't think so. Democrat apparatchiks are as skilled and talented as Republican apparatchiks, maybe more so. Any outsider who watched from start to finish a Trump rally probably slapped his forehead and gasped, "how could Hariss lose?"
I don't consider "Trump Rallies' part of the RW messaging machine. The RW messaging machine was started with Rush Limbaugh way back 20+ years ago. Trump rallies were just comedy shows for the uneducated.
The answer is shaping up to be as a whole the national Democratic Party moved too far to the extreme left too quickly and left middle America behind. Best that can happen now is over the next two years Trump's administration proves to be the ineffective government failure progressives hope it will be.
 
The answer is shaping up to be as a whole the national Democratic Party moved too far to the extreme left too quickly and left middle America behind.
All the developed countries of the world have universal health care or single payer insurance except the US. How are Democrats extreme left in wanting what the rest of the world has?
Are Democrats too far left in trying to see that all people, minorities, LGBT people, immigrants, the handicapped, elderly, women, children ... everybody has an equal opportunity to be healthy, educated, live without harassment, be treated justly, have their country defended and see that they participate in all of society's opportunity
Our Constitution says that's exactly what we are trying to do when we say "to form a more perfect union" How is that too far left? Or perhaps your interpretation of a more perfect union is one run by wealthy white males, for wealthy white males with the legal power to run rough shod over everyone that isn't wealthy, isn't white, and isn't male.

Best that can happen now is over the next two years Trump's administration proves to be the ineffective government failure progressives hope it will be.
Why would anyone want this country to fail. Democrats are desperately hoping that someone behind Trump, managing him, keeps him from causing the failure of the government.
 
That's nice.

My larger point stands. You're making a mistake when you think the only reason Trump won is voter stupidity.
It is easier for people to latch on to very simple minded platitudes when actual analysis is beyond their ability.

Ironically enough, calling others stupid is just their war of trying to posit themselves as intelligent.
 
All the developed countries of the world have universal health care or single payer insurance except the US. How are Democrats extreme left in wanting what the rest of the world has?
Are Democrats too far left in trying to see that all people, minorities, LGBT people, immigrants, the handicapped, elderly, women, children ... everybody has an equal opportunity to be healthy, educated, live without harassment, be treated justly, have their country defended and see that they participate in all of society's opportunity
Our Constitution says that's exactly what we are trying to do when we say "to form a more perfect union" How is that too far left? Or perhaps your interpretation of a more perfect union is one run by wealthy white males, for wealthy white males with the legal power to run rough shod over everyone that isn't wealthy, isn't white, and isn't male.


Why would anyone want this country to fail. Democrats are desperately hoping that someone behind Trump, managing him, keeps him from causing the failure of the government.
So you'd like a checklist with boxes I've checked off? Forget about it. I'm reporting what progressive focus groups are unearthing in their surveys. Don't like what's being reported? Oh, well. See how far this extreme mantra carries the day: "Or perhaps your interpretation of a more perfect union is one run by wealthy white males, for wealthy white males with the legal power to run rough shod over everyone that isn't wealthy, isn't white, and isn't male." That is so passé . . . and as the election just showed, defunct.

You need the center to win and to keep those progressive goals within reach.
 
So you'd like a checklist with boxes I've checked off? Forget about it. I'm reporting what progressive focus groups are unearthing in their surveys. Don't like what's being reported? Oh, well. See how far this extreme mantra carries the day: "Or perhaps your interpretation of a more perfect union is one run by wealthy white males, for wealthy white males with the legal power to run rough shod over everyone that isn't wealthy, isn't white, and isn't male." That is so passé . . . and as the election just showed, defunct.

You need the center to win and to keep those progressive goals within reach.
I'm assuming you are trying to be helpful by noting that the Democrats are out of step with the rest of the country. However, you haven't said what was too extreme. A check list of policies and practices that are too far left would really be helpful. I haven't seen any focus group articles on what is too extreme and it's pretty hard to change when you don't know what to change. Any help will be appreciated.
 
I'm assuming you are trying to be helpful by noting that the Democrats are out of step with the rest of the country. However, you haven't said what was too extreme. A check list of policies and practices that are too far left would really be helpful. I haven't seen any focus group articles on what is too extreme and it's pretty hard to change when you don't know what to change. Any help will be appreciated.
Just put online for public access is Navigator Research's Focus Group Report: New Trump Voters and Non-Voters on the Next Trump Administration. Navigator Research is a progressive outfit.

I'm about to engulf mucho many Christmas Eve tamales with family, so I won't be around much until the day after Christmas. Previously I've only read articles about this report, so as you and others read it, so will I.

Merry Christmas!
 
Oh come on! We've just had 4 years of Fox's constant dunning descriptions of a senile and incompetent Biden ruining a bustling economy and 6 months of how a promiscuous Ms. Harris traded sexual favors for cushy positions for which she was unqualified and preformed incompetently.

It is not demonizing to say that Trump lacks empathy, avoids responsibility, is involved in criminal behavior, is unethical, blames others, has a pathological need for attention. If you think the Democrats, during the campaign, should have been characterizing Trump as chaste, honest, youthful, experienced and qualified for the presidency I'm sure there are people willing to have that discussion with you. Frankly it is it is Republicans who are not processing the strange and unhealthy elements that are taking over their party.
Irrelevant.
 
Back
Top Bottom