- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Messages
- 96,461
- Reaction score
- 33,781
- Location
- Western Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
What the article is saying is that California could have plenty of water if they modernized their water storage and supply systems. Better water management is the solution.The blistering drought that has Californians timing their showers, driving dirty cars and staring at brown lawns and empty swimming pools is a “man-made disaster,” according to critics, who say the Golden State’s misguided environmental policies allow much-needed freshwater to flow straight into the Pacific.
In an average year, California gets enough snow and rain to put 200 million acres under a foot of water, but environmental opposition to dams over the last several decades has allowed the majority of the freshwater to flow into the ocean, even as the state’s population exploded to nearly 40 million people. The current drought has left farms parched and residents under strict water consumption orders, but some say it didn't have to be that way.
The critics say California gets plenty of water to meet its needs, if it were only managed properly. More than half of California’s surface water flows from the Sierra Nevada mountains in the east down to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta in Northern California. Much of the mountain runoff is managed by two of the world’s largest water storage and transport systems – the federal Central Valley Project and California's State Water Project. Each is a system of dams, reservoirs and distribution systems designed to send water to cities, towns and farms throughout the state.
But the vast majority of the state’s 1,400 dams and reservoirs, in the two massive systems and smaller ones that supply southern California, were built well before the 1980s. Environmentalists have since stopped the construction of water storage and delivery systems through legal and political actions. They have also fought to ensure that captured water is released into streams and the ocean -- rather than the water delivery system -- in order to boost fish populations and dilute the salinity of the delta.
What I find funny is while California is rationing water themselves and closing car washes they also require commercial vehicles entering their state to be clean placing a greater water burden on neighboring states. Truck washes along major corridors entering CA are common so that drivers are not ticketed in CA for dirty vehicles.
I dunno I only have 50,000 commercial miles in california and I never got pulled into a weigh station or stopped because my truck was dirty. My company was cheap, I entered Calif many times with a dirty truck
Is it my imagination, or do the drought areas seem to follow where the least amount of soot is:
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2004/2004_Hansen_etal_1.pdf
Figure 1 shows soot concentrations. Isn't the blue area where we have the least precipitation, relative to the past? I'm not implying that soot is good, but we all know that the atmosphere more readily releases moisture, as precipitation, when there are more aerosols present. What I am thinking...
Is it possible that we have droughts in the cleaner regions, because the dirtier ones are causing precipitation, before the clouds make it over the cleaner ones?
What I find funny is while California is rationing water themselves and closing car washes they also require commercial vehicles entering their state to be clean placing a greater water burden on neighboring states. Truck washes along major corridors entering CA are common so that drivers are not ticketed in CA for dirty vehicles.
Is there any sanity in the green movement at all?
California is naturally a desert. It thrives as a result of man's efforts. Stop doing the work and it will be a desert again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?