• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Man kills 6 family members, still at large.


He "claimed" to suffer from PTSD. A man who just killed a half dozen innocent people, including a teenager. Yes, he was a credible man.

No straw man here, sorry to disappoint you. Just calling out people who use the deaths of 6 innocent people and minimal other facts to advance an anti-war agenda. But keep at it. Maybe you can take your laptop to their graves and post some more about how the poor man was a victim.
 

His claims of PTSD predate him killing six people. He wasn't using it as an alibi.
 
His claims of PTSD predate him killing six people. He wasn't using it as an alibi.

Fascinating. Share that with someone who says the dead man needed an alibi for something. That isn't me.
 
Fascinating. Share that with someone who says the dead man needed an alibi for something. That isn't me.

You said his claims of PTSD lack credibility because he did something horrible.
 
I never did that.

You obviously are incapable of looking at a tragic situation objectively and seeing the bigger implications...
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…