• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Man behind anti-Clinton ad convicted (1 Viewer)

KidRocks

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
1,337
Reaction score
16
Location
right here
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
There you go folks, absolute proof that this is the 'type' of people that permeate the Republican Party, proof that the RNC knowingly hires and seek advise from creeps and shady people like this fellow and the Swift-Boat liars.

The Republican party has come a long way since the inception of Rush Limbaugh and talk-radio.













http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/06/28/consultant.conviction.ap/index.html

EDINBURG, Texas (AP) -- A political consultant whose company was behind a television ad accusing the Clinton-Gore administration of giving away nuclear technology was convicted of child molestation charges.

A jury deliberated almost two days before convicting Carey Lee Cramer, 44, of aggravated sexual assault of a child, two counts of indecency with a child by contact and one count of indecency with a child by exposure. He was cleared of nine other charges Tuesday.

The sentencing phase of the trial was scheduled to begin Wednesday. Cramer faces up to 149 years in prison.

Cramer gained national attention during the 2000 presidential election when his company created the ad that accused the administration of giving nuclear technology to China in exchange for campaign contributions.

The spot was pulled after a barrage of Democratic criticism...
 
Just because one Republican is a child molester, that doesn't mean that they all are. This thread is soooo retarded. He's also a man. Does that mean that all men are child molesters? I'm sure that at least one Democrat has molested a child. Does that mean that all Democrats are child molesters? You could say the same thing about blacks, whites, gays, Christians, whoever. This thread should be deleted.

Edit: BTW, Clinton DID sell secrets to the PRC. Read post #149 in this link.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/polls/11712-another-question-conservatives-one-about-clinton-15.html
 
mpg said:
Just because one Republican is a child molester, that doesn't mean that they all are. This thread is soooo retarded. He's also a man. Does that mean that all men are child molesters? I'm sure that at least one Democrat has molested a child. Does that mean that all Democrats are child molesters? You could say the same thing about blacks, whites, gays, Christians, whoever. This thread should be deleted.

Edit: BTW, Clinton DID sell secrets to the PRC. Read post #149 in this link.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/polls/11712-another-question-conservatives-one-about-clinton-15.html





Didn't say that all Republicans are child molesters, you did, what I did imply is that this is the type of people hired, that are most typical of the the Republican Party today... shady and creepy.!
 
KidRocks said:
Didn't say that all Republicans are child molesters, you did, what I did imply is that this is the type of people hired, that are most typical of the the Republican Party today... shady and creepy.!

Payback is hell, ain't it?
 
KidRocks said:
Didn't say that all Republicans are child molesters, you did, what I did imply is that this is the type of people hired, that are most typical of the the Republican Party today... shady and creepy.!

Do you have any evidence to back up that this sort of person is typical, not an outlier? Cause otherwise that's an unfounded statement, which would make it :spin:

I'm a good lefty, but dude that's a silly thing to say...
 
The Pi Pirate said:
Do you have any evidence to back up that this sort of person is typical, not an outlier? Cause otherwise that's an unfounded statement, which would make it :spin:

I'm a good lefty, but dude that's a silly thing to say...




Ann Coulter?

The Swift-Boat Liars

Rush Limpbaugh?

Pat Robertson?

Bill O'Reilly

Tom DeLay?

Albert Pirro

Rumsfeld

etc,

etc,

etc!

Cheney?
 
KidRocks said:
Didn't say that all Republicans are child molesters, you did, what I did imply is that this is the type of people hired, that are most typical of the the Republican Party today... shady and creepy.!
"typical" is almost as bad as "all". This thread should be deleted for stupidity.
 
mpg said:
"typical" is almost as bad as "all". This thread should be deleted for stupidity.
What we need is a way to vote on thread stupidity. If a thread exceeds a stupidity threshold of .75 (number of people voting for a thread's stupidity divided by the number of people posting on a thread) for more than 24 hrs., it gets sent to a special forum ( The Hall Of Stupidity) where people can practice their "This thread is so stupid that..." skills.
 
The 9 people that you've listed, even if we assume for the sake of argument, do not constitute anywhere near a majority. If you want to make the point that this is a modus operandi for the set of folks hired by the republican party (including low profile folks like this guy), you need to look at a large enough random sample, and preferably get your study peer-reviewed. Or find a similar study. Otherwise your claims end up being nothing but... :spin:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom