• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Make the case on why new machine guns should be [W:456, 841, 899]

Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

TurtleDude said:
oh its plenty deniable

REagan wasn't motivated to ban guns
Click to expand...

One must note that you want to talk about things which CANNOT be conclusively proven like motivation and intent and purpose and inspiration rather than actual hard cold actions which speak for themselves and are undeniable as concrete facts of history.

That says a great deal about your inability to deny those same facts of history.
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned



yes we can

for anyone who was actually following that bill, it was widely known and reported that REAGAN had publicly said he was going to sign into law the McLure-Volker Firearms Owner Protection Act

that is why Hughes and Rangel conspired to violate the rules and ignore the vote, to try to derail the bill

so that is more evidence as to the specious nature of the silly arguments you advance
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned


President Reagan had the power to veto the bill. He did NOT do so. Instead, he SIGNED the bill into law.

That action dwarfs any phony pretense or inane rationalizations about motivation or intent or purpose or inspiration or any other waffling to try and get around what President Reagan actually did.
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned


you have been told dozens of times why Reagan signed the bill despite the machinations of dishonest Democrats
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

TurtleDude said:
you have been told dozens of times why Reagan signed the bill despite the machinations of dishonest Democrats
Click to expand...

I read your sorrowful tale of what you believe because you want to believe it. Such rationalizations and excuses are irrelevant next to the action itself.
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned


coming from people who say 2nd Amendment does not protect the right to keep and bear arms, or rights do not exist I will laugh long and hard...
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

AmericanSpartan said:
coming from people who say 2nd Amendment does not protect the right to keep and bear arms, or rights do not exist I will laugh long and hard...
Click to expand...

You must be laughing in the mirror.
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

haymarket said:
Perhaps because no such pre-existingright has ever been shown to exist in the real world. Even your ally Turtle has admitted that. So why do you cling to that willful belief when you cannot produce any evidence of it?
Click to expand...

The Supreme Court agrees with me.

D.C. vs. Heller, the Supreme Court said the Second Amendment “codified a pre-existing right. The very text of the Second Amendment implicitly recognizes the pre-existence of the right and declares only that it “shall not be infringed ... this is not a right granted by the Constitution” (p. 19).
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned


One group of believers stating that they believe that a different group were also believers DOES NOT make a right retroactive over two centuries ago that did not exist then and did not protect anyone.

I only wish that it were that easy to change history because you believe like Gertie did in ET.
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

haymarket said:
I was right. You are laughing in the mirror.
Click to expand...

so you can not make a point about limiting the civil rights of other Americans, but you about laughing in the mirror?...
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

haymarket said:
I read your sorrowful tale of what you believe because you want to believe it. Such rationalizations and excuses are irrelevant next to the action itself.
Click to expand...

any clue what this silliness iso about

and I see he cannot counter my facts so he ignores facts
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned


but yet you believe FDR could retroactively pretend that the commerce clause was a grant of power to the federal government for gun control
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

TurtleDude said:
but yet you believe FDR could retroactively pretend that the commerce clause was a grant of power to the federal government for gun control
Click to expand...

The crippled Marxist scumbag, I really do hope in some other time line he dead, or lost in the election.
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

AmericanSpartan said:
so you can not make a point about limiting the civil rights of other Americans, but you about laughing in the mirror?...
Click to expand...

I already made the point about your use of the stolen term civil rights.
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

TurtleDude said:
but yet you believe FDR could retroactively pretend that the commerce clause was a grant of power to the federal government for gun control
Click to expand...

Are you not aware that different courts can see the facts differently in different cases presented at different times?
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

TurtleDude said:
any clue what this silliness iso about

and I see he cannot counter my facts so he ignores facts
Click to expand...

No i do not. Your post makes no sense to me at all since the so called 'facts' do not support your claims.
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

haymarket said:
I already made the point about your use of the stolen term civil rights.
Click to expand...

sorry but civil rights are not just stuff Democrat pretend they are the sole champions for
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

haymarket said:
Are you not aware that different courts can see the facts differently in different cases presented at different times?
Click to expand...

sure, dishonest justices *****whipped by a would be dictator are likely to reject precedent and obvious intent of the founders when those controlling devices limit the desires of their puppet master
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

TurtleDude said:
sorry but civil rights are not just stuff Democrat pretend they are the sole champions for
Click to expand...

Of course its not as its also another term the radical right has stolen and attempted to pervert to advance their own extremist agenda.
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

TurtleDude said:
sure, dishonest justices *****whipped by a would be dictator are likely to reject precedent and obvious intent of the founders when those controlling devices limit the desires of their puppet master
Click to expand...

The historical record says otherwise as personified by the biography and words of Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes.
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

haymarket said:
The historical record says otherwise as personified by the biography and words of Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes.
Click to expand...

yeah, the gullible think *****whipped justices who change course completely did so for honest reasons
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

haymarket said:
Of course its not as its also another term the radical right has stolen and attempted to pervert to advance their own extremist agenda.
Click to expand...

the only extremists we see here are statist collectivists pretending that the bill of rights are based on a lie
 
Re: Make the case on why new machine guns should be banned

TurtleDude said:
yeah, the gullible think *****whipped justices who change course completely did so for honest reasons
Click to expand...

Read the Hughes biography and get educated to the workings of the Court on the decisions you hate, They totally flush and crush, trash and smash, the silly claims that you make here about FDR and the Court.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…