• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Major US fuel pipeline forced to shut down after being targeted in cyberattack

I'm seeing a 10kw system provides 26 to 40 kwh per day. My average usage is 45ish per day, 60 kwh per day a month or two out of the year, that gives me needing almost 20kw system (I live far enough north that I'm sure I'd be on the lower end of efficiency) to cover my usage, which currently costs me $100 a month. Maybe I'm reading my meter reports wrong? 1300ish kwh / 30 day billing cycle is 40ish kwh/day, yes? Do most people really use half of that, and pay 2x as much?
Yes, most people use less than that (around half, at least during non summer months), and pay twice as much. So yes, solar would be a good thing for the average homeowning family. It isn't really all that difficult to find this information out either. Just do a little research.
 
Yes, most people use less than that (around half, at least during non summer months), and pay twice as much. So yes, solar would be a good thing for the average homeowning family. It isn't really all that difficult to find this information out either. Just do a little research.
Wow. Yeah, if my electric bill was 4x what it currently is, solar might make sense. I'm glad its not. Had no idea people paid so much, considering the average price of electricity is only 13c per kilowatt hour and not 32 cents where a solar system starts to make sense...
 
Most people don't need that much most months. Most people average less than 9kW for 9 months out of the year. Even my family could use the 10kW and we have two teens, and 3 adults working from home.


This means that even for a 4 bedroom home, they are paying about $150 per month. That is $1800 per year, which means the system is paid for just in savings from electricity in about 12 years, less if they make the house more energy efficient and possibly sell back at a net profit.
Wait, if they are paying $150 a month. at 13c per kwh, then they are using almost 40kwh per month, that a 10kw system wouldn't reliably cover... much less have any excess to sell... same situation I'm in... your math is wonky... It doesn't come close to working.
 
How do those numbers work out for you? I'm seeing a 10 KW system supplyz between 26 and 40 kwh per day; my average usage is somewhere in the 40 to 60 kwh/day, and that only runs me $100 per month (plus $20/ month of connection fees). It would take me at least a 10kw system, probably closer to 20 kw since I've got a sub optimal layout, to save a consistent $100 a month.
I did not get the system installed, the high efficiency AC was both needed and a produced better savings.
(Also, My Wife, did not want solar panels on the front(South) of the house.)
 
I did not get the system installed, the high efficiency AC was both needed and a produced better savings.
(Also, My Wife, did not want solar panels on the front(South) of the house.)
I was just wondering who told you a 5kw system would save you $1,000 a year. That would put your electricity prices at about 10x the national average of the United States, and significantly higher than any place on planet Earth.
 
Wait, if they are paying $150 a month. at 13c per kwh, then they are using almost 40kwh per month, that a 10kw system wouldn't reliably cover... much less have any excess to sell... same situation I'm in... your math is wonky... It doesn't come close to working.
Yes, it makes zero sense if the goal is to save money. At this point, people are much better off investing that 20k than sinking it into solar panels and hoping just to break even over a decade later.
 
I'm fine with air travel being largley shut down. It's awful for the environment. No big loss. Tax it heavily and invest that money planting trees and scrubbing carbon from the air, to ensure that it air travel becomes carbon negative. Sounds good to me.

I cant go with the whole taxing or destruction of modern society part unless you get consent from 3/4 of the states, but youre certainly entitled to try to live in such a conservative way. Much like my libertarian utopia, I think we're both not ever going to get what we want.
 
I was just wondering who told you a 5kw system would save you $1,000 a year. That would put your electricity prices at about 10x the national average of the United States, and significantly higher than any place on planet Earth.
I think it was based on the average number of Kwh generated per month at my Latitude.
I suspected it was a bit optimistic, but was wandering how much the shading effect would count.
 
Seems like people on the right see things as they are and ask, "Why not?"

People on the left see people as they are and say, "Go screw yourself".

Why was the Keystone XL pipeline CONSTRUCTION ended? Certainly did not save Federal money. In truth, it cost tax dollars. WHY?
Well I am not sure why
but there could be a lot of reasons one among them would be the safety record of the construction co.
they are known to have put in a lot of pipelines that leak and seeing they want to run that pipeline right over one of the Biggest aquifers in the country with their record it might not be a good idea.
They are going to pump tar sands oil in that pipe the dirtiest oil known to man , to the sea ports in the south to be shipped over seas it is not used here and we get no benefit from having it possibly destroying that aquifer and having millions of people losing their water supply
It will put something like 15 or 20 people to work ( maybe a few more but not a lot more ) when it is done and that ( from what I read and understand) would be to patrol the pipe for leaks , there is over 1000 miles of pipe and that would be an avg. of 1 person on patrol for every 500miles per shift 7 days a week or less
and if there was a small leak say several hundred barrels a day they may not see it at the end of the line and it might be several days before they saw it and by then that water supply could be gone
and one more thing if this pipeline and this construction company was so good ( and safe ) and such a good idea why didn't they run it to the west coast of Canada?
it would have been shorter and cost less
Have a nice afternoon
 
I cant go with the whole taxing or destruction of modern society part unless you get consent from 3/4 of the states, but youre certainly entitled to try to live in such a conservative way. Much like my libertarian utopia, I think we're both not ever going to get what we want.
Modern society would function just fine with very, very little air travel.
 
Yes, it makes zero sense if the goal is to save money. At this point, people are much better off investing that 20k than sinking it into solar panels and hoping just to break even over a decade later.
That's an excellent point. Investing $20k doubles (pays for itself) in 10 years, at even low average interest rates. And doubles, again, to $80 k in 20 years. Leaving it invested for 20 years at 10% nets over $140 k. Very good point.

Makes the $200 a month people are worried about saving on their electric bill seem downright silly.
 
That's an excellent point. Investing $20k doubles (pays for itself) in 10 years, at even low average interest rates. And doubles, again, to $80 k in 20 years. Leaving it invested for 20 years at 10% nets over $140 k. Very good point.

Makes the $200 a month people are worried about saving on their electric bill seem downright silly.
The point is not just to make money/save money, but to also help the environment and to reduce the load on the electric system. And again, $20k is about the cost of the system which lasts for about 20-25 years.
 
The point is not just to make money/save money, but to also help the environment and to reduce the load on the electric system. And again, $20k is about the cost of the system which lasts for about 20-25 years.
The funny thing about all these proposed efforts to save the planet is that most people can’t afford them. $20K is on the low end and, on average, that will only buy you a 7Kw system that degrades every year. The technology doesn’t exist for solar to be practical and accessible.
 
I guess you didn't realize renewable energy has to be transmitted via transmission lines and is also vulnerable to hacking? Just about everything these days is linked to computers and the Internet.
I happen to be passingly familiar with NERC CIP standards and protections.

What does that have to do with east coast whiners hoarding fossil fuels because they are unprepared to accept the future?

Your comment implied that renewable was not prone to the perils of the present situation did it not? If not my apologies.
 
The funny thing about all these proposed efforts to save the planet is that most people can’t afford them. $20K is on the low end and, on average, that will only buy you a 7Kw system that degrades every year. The technology doesn’t exist for solar to be practical and accessible.
No, that is the average and I posted it for solar panels. And if you own a home, that isn't that hard to get a loan for that amount for such a renovation. It also does not significantly degrade to needing replaced (having a noticeable effect on your system/power supply) for 20-25 years (I posted links regarding this). Many people have had solar for decades now. People in Washington state, near Seattle, have been selling back their power to the companies there (I know because I know some of the shipyard workers who had solar panels installed out there).
 
No, that is the average and I posted it for solar panels. And if you own a home, that isn't that hard to get a loan for that amount for such a renovation. It also does not significantly degrade to needing replaced (having a noticeable effect on your system/power supply) for 20-25 years (I posted links regarding this). Many people have had solar for decades now. People in Washington state, near Seattle, have been selling back their power to the companies there (I know because I know some of the shipyard workers who had solar panels installed out there).

The average cost of the system depends on its size.

CD4B0AFC-7056-4354-AB65-570EF1967EA6.jpeg

It’s worth pointing out the degradation of these systems because their output consistently degrades annually which prolongs the time it takes to recoup the initial investment. The vast majority of Americans do not have tens of thousands of dollars laying around to pay for the upfront costs and the fact is that the system will probably reach end of life before you can profit from it particularly if, as you suggest, you’re taking out loans to pay for it. You might as well just save yourself the hassle and pay the energy company that $20K as an advance.
 
The average cost of the system depends on its size.

View attachment 67333054

It’s worth pointing out the degradation of these systems because their output consistently degrades annually which prolongs the time it takes to recoup the initial investment. The vast majority of Americans do not have tens of thousands of dollars laying around to pay for the upfront costs and the fact is that the system will probably reach end of life before you can profit from it particularly if, as you suggest, you’re taking out loans to pay for it. You might as well just save yourself the hassle and pay the energy company that $20K as an advance.
Do you believe that energy prices stay constant over time too? And the average homeowners need about the 10kW system, not the 20kW system.

Degradation is about 1% each year. Not a major degradation and they last at least as long as I posted.



And they appear to come with about a 20-25 year warranty, which means they are making a promise on certain level of output.


You can easily pay for those panels in that time frame.
 
Modern society would function just fine with very, very little air travel.

It wouldnt be modern society that we would have. You would effectively eliminate global travel, and space travel. You would have electric trains, maybe boats. You want a clean version of pre industrial living. Its a nice thought. But not possible any time soon. Not likely in our lifetime, especially if you suddenly shut it all down.
 
Do you believe that energy prices stay constant over time too? And the average homeowners need about the 10kW system, not the 20kW system.

Degradation is about 1% each year. Not a major degradation and they last at least as long as I posted.



And they appear to come with about a 20-25 year warranty, which means they are making a promise on certain level of output.


You can easily pay for those panels in that time frame.
I think you should be realistic. The vast majority of Americans have less than $1,000 in savings. That means the vast majority of Americans cannot afford the upfront average $28,100 cost of a 10Kw system. And for what? You want people to incur debt to pay for it so they have another bill every month? They’ll be paying more in interest alone on the loan they took out to pay for it than they’ll save in electric costs and they’ll never even break even.
 
It wouldnt be modern society that we would have. You would effectively eliminate global travel, and space travel. You would have electric trains, maybe boats. You want a clean version of pre industrial living. Its a nice thought. But not possible any time soon. Not likely in our lifetime, especially if you suddenly shut it all down.
Yes, nothing and no one travels the globe without airplanes today.. . SMH. Life would be basically uninterrupted for the vast majority of people without air travel. And much improved for most.
 
It wouldnt be modern society that we would have. You would effectively eliminate global travel, and space travel. You would have electric trains, maybe boats. You want a clean version of pre industrial living. Its a nice thought. But not possible any time soon. Not likely in our lifetime, especially if you suddenly shut it all down.
I disagree in a sense, we can have it all!
We can make carbon neutral fuels to run our jets, ships, trains, and even cars.
The fuel is made from atmospheric CO2, hydrogen from water, and electricity.
and it is not decades off, but the first jet fuel plant is already under construction.
Europe’s first power-to-liquid demo plant in Norway plans renewable aviation fuel production in 2023
The Navy, whose process is older and less efficient, thinks they can make fuel for between $3 and $6 a gallon.
We are really just waiting on economic viability, which is tied to the price of oil, vs the wholesale price of electricity.
 
Your comment implied that renewable was not prone to the perils of the present situation did it not? If not my apologies.
Zero percent of the renewable energy produced in Texas will be transported to the Eastern seaboard, and thus the risks of a similar issue of trans regional disruption are low. I don't think that will change.
 
The point is not just to make money/save money, but to also help the environment and to reduce the load on the electric system. And again, $20k is about the cost of the system which lasts for about 20-25 years.
Oh. Well then that should be the argument, since economically speaking it doesn't seem to work out except at the very best case scenarios.
 

  • The Colonial Pipeline ships petrol and jet fuel from the Gulf coast of Texas to the populous East Coast
  • Joe Biden received a briefing on the incident on Saturday morning, a White House spokesperson said
The main fuel supply line to the US East Coast has shut down indefinitely after the pipeline‘s operator suffered what is believed to be the largest successful cyberattack on oil infrastructure in the country’s history – presenting a danger of spiking petrol prices and a fresh challenge to US President Joe Biden’s pledges to secure the nation against threats.

The attack on the Colonial Pipeline, which runs 5,500 miles and provides nearly half the petrol, diesel and jet fuel used on the East Coast, most immediately affected some of the company’s business-side computer systems – not the systems that directly run the pipelines themselves. The Georgia-based company said it shut down the pipelines as a precaution and has engaged a third-party cybersecurity firm to investigate the incident, which it confirmed was a ransomware attack. It first disclosed the shutdown late Friday and said it has also contacted law enforcement and other federal agencies.
============================================================================
Many of these pipelines were built around 1942 so oil shipments from TX would not have to travel by sea to the refiniries across from NYC. , a big problem with the U-boats. I used to live near one in central NJ. Vast operation over 5K miles long.
The pipeline takes tanker trucks off the road. Anyone who cares about the environment would support the pipeline; it's the lesser evil.
 
I think you should be realistic. The vast majority of Americans have less than $1,000 in savings. That means the vast majority of Americans cannot afford the upfront average $28,100 cost of a 10Kw system. And for what? You want people to incur debt to pay for it so they have another bill every month? They’ll be paying more in interest alone on the loan they took out to pay for it than they’ll save in electric costs and they’ll never even break even.
We aren't talking about the vast majority of Americans, those living in rentals or apartments or other places. The original post was about new homes being built with solar panels and people fixing up their homes with solar panels. If you have any amount of equity in your home as a homeowner, then you can take out a loan to get solar panels installed without much effort.
 
Back
Top Bottom