https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018...ohedge.com&utm_term=69017&utm_content=2308590
The report was covered or referenced by MSM outlets worldwide, including the Washington Post, New York Times, BBC, Reuters and others.
The Washington Post, for example, reported: "The higher-than-expected amount of heat in the oceans means more heat is being retained within Earth’s climate system each year, rather than escaping into space. In essence, more heat in the oceans signals that global warming is more advanced than scientists thought."
The New York Times at least hedged their reporting, claiming that the estimates, "if proven accurate, could be another indication that the global warming of the past few decades has exceeded conservative estimates and has been more closely in line with scientists’ worst-case scenarios."
Unfortunately for the Princeton-Scripps team, it appears that their report has been proven inaccurate.
And it will be business as normal with the media. The will run and run and run with stories that sensationalize things, but don't expect to see them print a single retraction.
No wonder the left side of the isle voter is so ignorant. They let the media tell them what to believe.
Oh you know what it'll be. No big deal .Doesn't change anything. And not just the media but within the (lw ) science community.
They'll circle the wagons .Remember Climate gate ?
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018...ohedge.com&utm_term=69017&utm_content=2308590
The report was covered or referenced by MSM outlets worldwide, including the Washington Post, New York Times, BBC, Reuters and others.
The Washington Post, for example, reported: "The higher-than-expected amount of heat in the oceans means more heat is being retained within Earth’s climate system each year, rather than escaping into space. In essence, more heat in the oceans signals that global warming is more advanced than scientists thought."
The New York Times at least hedged their reporting, claiming that the estimates, "if proven accurate, could be another indication that the global warming of the past few decades has exceeded conservative estimates and has been more closely in line with scientists’ worst-case scenarios."
Unfortunately for the Princeton-Scripps team, it appears that their report has been proven inaccurate.
Has the paper been withdrawn?
I see that warmists avoid this thread completely, how interesting.
Cheers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?