• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Loretta Lynch falls under the Clintons’ corrupting influence

Baloney. I think the State Dept would love put this stupid farce to rest as quickly as possible. But to end it wouldn't be to the GOPs advantage because keeping the farce going as long as possible is all they have to help get their stupid, lying, corrupt, fascist, racist candidate elected.

Of course the State Dept. wants to end it.....their boss has egg on his face and their party does too!

The Biggest Farce of all, is anyone voting for Hillary the Crook!

Doesn't get any dumber than that....
 
:roll:

:2bigcry:

Or maybe conservatives should make sure their own underwear is clean...before they start sniffing others.
 
Of course the State Dept. wants to end it.....their boss has egg on his face and their party does too!

The Biggest Farce of all, is anyone voting for Hillary the Crook!

Doesn't get any dumber than that....
Is it true that whatever a conservative says...the opposite is true? It would seem so.
 
Or maybe conservatives should make sure their own underwear is clean...before they start sniffing others.

Try to stay classy Moot. Perhaps it's a stretch for liberal/socialist Progressives to do, given all the evidence, but it isn't that hard to do.
 
You are sorely uninformed about Hillary's, State's, Obama's and this administration's response to the legitimate FOIA requests submitted to the courts.

Google is your friend.

At every turn, Hillary', State, Obama and his administration's response to legitimate FOIA requests and legitimate Congressional investigative committee's requests has been to delay, defer, lie, obfuscate, and out right stonewall those requests. That's not 'cooperated throughout this entire sordid political farce' in the least.

Precisely!

Oh that's right...conservatives don't think a lie is a lie unless it's under oath. Which might explain why most cons don't think that they're really lying when they lie.


It's too bad Clinton's accusers, Henry Hyde, Dennis Hastert and Newt Gingrich weren't put under oath as well....

What We Now Know About The Men Who Led The Impeachment Of Clinton | ThinkProgress

Wow! Not only are you misinformed, but you are very desperate.

She may not have instantly complied with all the committees demands....but she most certainly complied with the law.

Bawaaaa-Haaaaaa! She has obstructed justice her entire criminal life Moot...Get Real!!!

Only because she was forced to by multiple decisions from the federal bench. Had the judge not rendered those decisions, she would not have complied in the least, and this position ignores all the aforementioned stalling, obfuscation, delaying, lying, and out right stonewalling any and all legitimate requests for documentation.

Face it Moot. Hillary is a crooked as a dog's hind leg, and as corrupt as Al Capone.

MEGA DITTOS!!!!!!! :applaud

No, even to them it's not a lie even if it's under oath, 'cause if the facts say something other than the con's claim, then obviously everyone else must have taken his claim out of context.

Oh Glen...c'mon ....you are smarter than this!
 
The point is...she shouldn't have been investigated without any evidence in the first place. Fishing expeditions like the ones the republican congresses have engaged in, is a direct abuse of power and violation of the BoR, imo. So if they can do it to her...they can do it to anyone....including you. I sure wouldn't mind seeing the SCOTUS weigh in on this kind of abuse of power and waste of public funding for political gain.

The only abuse of power here Moot, is that by Hillary! Give it up!

I dunno Moot. If you look at the sequence of events surrounding the Benghazi attack, the reaction and public statements from Hillary, Obama, and his administration, I think it quite justified for a reasoned and reasonable congressional oversight, it's kinda part of their job description. Given the long drawn out process, mostly driven by the delaying actions taken by Hillary, Obama, and his administration, seems to me that it's of little surprize that it took that long and that many investigations to come to a conclusion.

Anyone forthcoming in a timely manner, I think would have been spared such a long and drawn out process, the upshot being, I think that long and drawn out process was self-inflicted.

YES!!! :thumbs::thumbs:

How dare liars accuse other people of lying.

People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

No...republicans should repay the taxpayers for using their money for republican political gain...and not doing the job they were elected to do.

We didn't elect them to sniff people's underwear or sit in judgment of moral sins.

No we didn't and they aren't....they are trying to nail this evil bitch for the umpteenth time in her Crooked Life!!!

Have even read more than just the headline Mick?

Don't need to...Crooked is as Crooked does..
 
Last edited:
Or maybe conservatives should make sure their own underwear is clean...before they start sniffing others.

Why are you obsessed with underwear? :shock:

Is it true that whatever a conservative says...the opposite is true? It would seem so.

Is it true whenever a liberal's lips move, they are lying? It would seem so.
 
Why are you obsessed with underwear? :shock:



Is it true whenever a liberal's lips move, they are lying? It would seem so.

Obsession with other people's sex lives seems to be a conservative trait. No shock there.
 
Hillary has cooperated throughout this entire sordid political farce the entire time. I seriously doubt a republican could endure what she's had to endure from political enemies for the last five years. That alone gives her extra points, imo.


Allow me to second this is larger print:

Hillary has cooperated throughout this entire sordid political farce the entire time. I seriously doubt a republican could endure what she's had to endure from political enemies for the last five years. That alone gives her extra points, imo.

My guess is: She was pleased to get her testimony over with...and to get this thing moving to a conclusion. In fact, I would guess she was delighted!

And it WAS a voluntary interview...no matter the spin some people want to put on it.
 
The point is...she shouldn't have been investigated without any evidence in the first place. Fishing expeditions like the ones the republican congresses have engaged in, is a direct abuse of power and violation of the BoR, imo. So if they can do it to her...they can do it to anyone....including you. I sure wouldn't mind seeing the SCOTUS weigh in on this kind of abuse of power and waste of public funding for political gain.

Doubling down on giving Clintons a pass on whatever corruption, lying, cheating and stealing they do. Yeah, that's really nice of you, but it's misplaced.

No, the events and responses of Benghazi warranted an investigation, that beyond a doubt.

Had the legitimate requests for information been met in a timely and reasonable fashion, there may have only been a single investigation. But, no, that's not how Hillary, State, Obama and his administration decided to respond. Google up the judges rulings in the matter and you'll see for yourself. Every request was met with delay, diversion, excuses, and stonewalling, so much so that the judge had had enough of it and demanded that Hillary and State produce without fail on his schedule, not theirs. It generally isn't a good idea to delay, direct, make excuses, or stonewall so much so that the federal judge calls you out on it under penalty of contempt of court.

Sorry Moot. That meme of "she shouldn't have been investigated" doesn't play. It's kinda the point of a congressional investigation to gather the needed information to determine what the next appropriate steps should be.
 
She can’t help herself. Even yesterday, with the political world fixated on her meeting with FBI agents, Hillary Clinton had her flack mislead the public.

A spokesman said she gave a “voluntary” interview, which is true only because she agreed to talk instead of waiting to be subpoenaed. The flack also said she was “pleased” to assist the gumshoes.

Who believes she was “pleased” to be interviewed by the FBI in a criminal investigation that could upend her life?

But that’s the way the Clintons roll.

Loretta Lynch falls under the Clintons’ corrupting influence | New York Post

I don't buy it. I mean, I don't buy this article's attempt to blame Lynch's problems on the Clintons.


1. Lynch does whatever Obama tells her to do.

2. If Lynch didn't have Obama's permission to meet with Bill, then that's her problem. She knows better than to make a move without his blessing.

3. If Lynch did have Obama's permission to meet with Bill, then that's his problem. Let's face it...he's slick, but he does some dumbass stuff sometimes. Then he has to scramble to come up with BS to make it look like there's no big deal...even if it flies in the face of minimal credibility. "We just talked about grandkids, golf, etc." Kind of like, "They did it because of that video."


I have no sympathy for Lynch, whatsoever.
 
Obsession with other people's sex lives seems to be a Conservative trait. No shock there.

Nope....that's just more liberal propaganda. I can speak for all the Conservatives that I know and we don't give a rat's ass about anyone's sex life.

Allow me to second this is larger print:

Hillary has cooperated throughout this entire sordid political farce the entire time. I seriously doubt a republican could endure what she's had to endure from political enemies for the last five years. That alone gives her extra points, imo.

My guess is: She was pleased to get her testimony over with...and to get this thing moving to a conclusion. In fact, I would guess she was delighted!

And it WAS a voluntary interview...no matter the spin some people want to put on it.

Baloney. She and the crooked obama Regime, have thrown in all the blocks they could, to slow the FBI investigation down.

But.....the FBI is use to this and doggedly pursued it. ;) If she didn't come in voluntarily, they would have arrested her.......and she knows that!

In a high profile case, we investigators always attempt to allow the perp to voluntarily show up!! She knew her options were very limited!

Nice liberal spin Frank....but that's all ya got!

Doubling down on giving Clintons a pass on whatever corruption, lying, cheating and stealing they do. Yeah, that's really nice of you, but it's misplaced.

No, the events and responses of Benghazi warranted an investigation, that beyond a doubt.

Had the legitimate requests for information been met in a timely and reasonable fashion, there may have only been a single investigation. But, no, that's not how Hillary, State, Obama and his administration decided to respond. Google up the judges rulings in the matter and you'll see for yourself. Every request was met with delay, diversion, excuses, and stonewalling, so much so that the judge had had enough of it and demanded that Hillary and State produce without fail on his schedule, not theirs. It generally isn't a good idea to delay, direct, make excuses, or stonewall so much so that the federal judge calls you out on it under penalty of contempt of court.

Sorry Moot. That meme of "she shouldn't have been investigated" doesn't play. It's kinda the point of a congressional investigation to gather the needed information to determine what the next appropriate steps should be.

Yes indeed.
 
Allow me to second this is larger print:

Hillary has cooperated throughout this entire sordid political farce the entire time. I seriously doubt a republican could endure what she's had to endure from political enemies for the last five years. That alone gives her extra points, imo.

My guess is: She was pleased to get her testimony over with...and to get this thing moving to a conclusion. In fact, I would guess she was delighted!

And it WAS a voluntary interview...no matter the spin some people want to put on it.

Could you imagine the Don sitting for hours in front of a Congressional hearing hour after hour? The guy cant even take soft criticism without his face going all orange and tweeting insults, proof positive he is unfit for the job!!
 
Baloney. She and the crooked obama Regime, have thrown in all the blocks they could, to slow the FBI investigation down.

But.....the FBI is use to this and doggedly pursued it. ;) If she didn't come in voluntarily, they would have arrested her.......and she knows that!

In a high profile case, we investigators always attempt to allow the perp to voluntarily show up!! She knew her options were very limited!

Nice liberal spin Frank....but that's all ya got!

Live with your hatred of Hillary Clinton, Mickey.

I get a kick out of it...so be sure you let us all know how much hatred you have for her.
 
Could you imagine the Don sitting for hours in front of a Congressional hearing hour after hour? The guy cant even take soft criticism without his face going all orange and tweeting insults, proof positive he is unfit for the job!!

Right on, Yank.

Donald Trump could not withstand a tiny portion of the heat Hillary Clinton regularly deals with from the haters.
 
Right on, Yank.

Donald Trump could not withstand a tiny portion of the heat Hillary Clinton regularly deals with from the haters.

The woman has the gonads for the top job, no doubt. Most politicians would have crumbled pleading the 5th. She is tough lady, on that point alone she would get my vote.
 
Right on, Yank.

Donald Trump could not withstand a tiny portion of the heat Hillary Clinton regularly deals with from the haters.

Since Trump is not a crooked, lying scumbag like Hillary, there is no need for him to withstand the kind of heat Hillary deals with.

She's brought it all upon herself by her own actions.
 
Since Trump is not a crooked, lying scumbag like Hillary, there is no need for him to withstand the kind of heat Hillary deals with.

She's brought it all upon herself by her own actions.

Calm down, Mycroft. The grade-school theatrics are unnecessary.
 
Calm down, Mycroft. The grade-school theatrics are unnecessary.

No theatrics involve...only reality.

However, it has not escaped my notice that you cannot dispute my words...you can only attempt to minimize them.
 
I do. I think that Bill Clinton deliberately compromised her.

Even if he did, she still deserves no sympathy. She is still part of a corrupt, lying administration.

Look...if the Obama administration ever gave an indication that they act with a motivation of wanting to do the right thing for the American people...instead of the right thing for themselves and their Party...I would be inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt. But it hasn't. Ever.

That article tried to paint Lynch as being not as bad as Holder. The fact is...Holder did nothing that Obama didn't approve of beforehand and Lynch is no different.
 
Even if he did, she still deserves no sympathy. She is still part of a corrupt, lying administration.

Look...if the Obama administration ever gave an indication that they act with a motivation of wanting to do the right thing for the American people...instead of the right thing for themselves and their Party...I would be inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt. But it hasn't. Ever.

That article tried to paint Lynch as being not as bad as Holder. The fact is...Holder did nothing that Obama didn't approve of beforehand and Lynch is no different.

I don't disagree with most of what you said, but I don't think Obama had anything to do with the former President stalling his own departure and boarding that plane to talk about grandbabies and so on. Maybe he did, and if so, I hope inside sources will talk if guaranteed anonymity.

But for today, I think Bill Clinton, ever the opportunist, manufactured this "opportunity." She may be an experienced jurist, but I think Lynch naively allowed herself to, in a way, be "entrapped." And if this is so, I do feel sorry for her. The Clintons are masters at this crap.
 
Back
Top Bottom