• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Live Thread for the SC Democratic Presidential Debate


You can't be so sure of any of what you are saying. First, Bernie polls better among independents than among Democrats, and is getting the majority of independents. Second, Bernie is now attracting a lot of moderate support. Third, Bernie actually got 40.5% of the popular vote in Nevada and Warren got 11.5% so if Warren drops out which looks likely, those votes will likely transfer most to Bernie, who would then be at 52%. Fourth, even if this doesn't happen, just with his 40.5% in Nevada, Bernie got 66% of the Nevada delegates because given the 15% threshold that others didn't make, his total got recalculated up to account for 100% of delegates.

If Bernie continues to earn 66% of delegates each state or most states, then he WILL achieve a simple majority in the convention.
 

Nah, most people vote straight ticket, down ballot. Any candidate who increases turn out, benefits the down ballot races. Bernie may end up helping elect more Democratic senators and house representatives. Statements to the contrary, defying conventional wisdom that increased turn out always benefits the down ballot candidates, is nothing but scare tactics to see if people will not vote for Bernie. By the way, it's not working. State to state, his numbers are actually growing; so much for the efficacy of the scare tactics.
 

Sure Trump is hated but Bernie's policies directly effect the lives or voters in a negative way. Many will not vote to take their employer healthcare away and to raise their taxes. That is why Trump wants Bernie so bad. We don't need to give people reasons to vote Trump another term. It's dangerous and stupid.
 
Yes, "then there is Trump". Which causes us to rethink everything (which is a good thing!).

Who would think general elections could be won by catering exclusively to one's partisan base? No one thought that, before trump. But here we are.

I am still not sure I would say that happened. Trump didn't really win so much as Hillary Lost.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
 
I am still not sure I would say that happened. Trump didn't really win so much as Hillary Lost.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk

You got it half right. Trump certainly did not win. He lost by nearly 3 million votes and the other democracies in the world are scratching their heads.
 
Anticipated Common Refrain of Fall 2020: "I hate his tweets, but...."
 
You got it half right. Trump certainly did not win. He lost by nearly 3 million votes and the other democracies in the world are scratching their heads.
cute, but we have a Constitution. If other countries don't understand the value of having one of those, well, their loss
 
I pretty much agree with your assessment. FL is likely Red (as is OH). PA's looking Blue. But I disagree in that I think MI is trending Red. So WI is the only one of the four I can't place, but I think it might be leaning Red.

I may caution on that. Bernie hasn't - as he is still in a Democratic Primary - really had his plan to shut down fracking advertised. Pennsylvania stands to lose a lot if that industry goes under, and Republicans will hammer that home.
 

Trump actually doesn't want to face Bernie (his stated view is he would prefer to campaign against Bloomberg); his advisors do, and to be frank, if Trump has any specific competency outside of being a showman, it's that he has demonstrably good political instincts: https://theintercept.com/2020/01/29/trump-sanders-2020-election/
 

I kept you for 24 hrs on Ignore because I got frustrated with your endless repetition of the same outdated ideas despite my showing you the data that contradicts it, which you make a point of completely ignoring. I've shown to you that the people who have good health care though their employers are a minority, and 70% of the people, which corresponds roughly to those who don't (who are 2 to 1 more numerous than those who do) may be voting for Sanders precisely because they believe that M4A is good for them. For each one person thinking what you believe therefore won't vote for Bernie, two others think the opposite therefore will vote for Bernie, thus, your argument is bogus. And again, if you raise taxes but eliminate premiums, co-pays, and deductibles, the end result may be more money in these people's pockets, again, defeating any hesitation in voting for Bernie for this reason. Despite your catastrophic predictions, Bernie continues to post better numbers than Trump, so all your fear mongering is actually not working.

If you will continue to repeat endlessly the same outdated points, should I place you on permanent Ignore?
 

I have already showed this to iguanaman, but he simply ignores it and continues to say that Trump wants to run against Bernie. There is NO way to get iguanaman to acknowledge something that someone shows to him.
 

158 million people have their healthcare policies with their employer. That is not a minority, it is half of people under 65. As far as Sanders "numbers" they have been purposely been skewed by Trump who has done nothing but praise and root for him. Just wait until the multi-million $ add campaigns painting him as a radical socialist who praises communist dictators. I am terrified of Trump being reelected and losing the House and so should you.


Health Insurance Coverage Eight Years After the ACA — 2018 Biennial | Commonwealth Fund
 

Yes, but you are forgetting to factor in the under-insured, people who have plans under their employers but the plans are lousy and they hate them.

I gave you these numbers already.

You never learn.

I'm placing you permanently on Ignore. Bye bye. Have a nice life. :2wave:
 

I wish you luck also and I really do. The stakes in this election are immensely high and have to do with the fate of our country much more than any ideology. More so than any in my 67 years. I just wish we had more than "luck". That has not been going our way lately.
 
This message is hidden because iguanaman is on your ignore list.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…