- Joined
- Mar 30, 2016
- Messages
- 34,697
- Reaction score
- 13,299
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
That's the worst spelling of "exposing" I've ever seen.
The only thing you expose is your prejudice and bias.
That's the worst spelling of "exposing" I've ever seen.
There are two things that all you charter members of the Don't Blame Islam club have in common:
1. You accuse me (and others) of telling lies about Islam, but you NEVER provide an example (because you can't).
2. You say that terrorism (or "jihad" if you prefer) is a corruption of Islam, but you NEVER provide an example (because you can't).
So you really have no answer.The various Christian churches were entirely on-board with colonialism.....and all the killing that resulted.
So you really have no answer.
I asked what the Christian religion did, not people that may be connected to it.
No, the only fact here is that you are evading the question.As I already said......Christianity’s leaders were entirely on board with spreading faith by the sword.
The Christian religion is responsible for millions upon millions of deaths. That is the fact of the matter
No, the only fact here is that you are evading the question.
The christian religion did nothing.
The Islamic religion did a lot.
We don't have to provide an example of the lies. They are contained in your posts.
I‘ve answered you multiple times now. The Christian religion was responsible for untold millions of deaths due to its support for colonialism. You not liking that fact doesn’t change it
Nope. Christians did, not Christianity (You know - the pacifist message ascribed to Jesus). That's the difference you refuse to acknowledge. If you did, you would have to admit that Islam differs in that way, and of course you have chosen to employ slothful induction instead.
Slothful induction, also known as the a priori fallacy, is the failure or refusal to see or concede the most likely inference from the evidence.
You still, after much prompting, haven't answered the "so what?" question. Islam has these scriptures that contradict what some clergyman said about it being in favor of peace, women's rights, etc. What implications, if any, does it have for us as individuals when we meet and interact with Muslims? What policy implications does your post imply?no that's all you. I was talking about what Muslims do I was talking about what Islam says.
If you can't do anything but hide under your bed perhaps that's where you belong.
But the way we found acceptance of something like homosexuality in the western culture was confronting stupid beliefs. Not pretending they don't exist to score virtue points.
if you don't want to discuss the topic because it has no implications for you as an individual than goodbyeYou still, after much prompting, haven't answered the "so what?" question. Islam has these scriptures that contradict what some clergyman said about it being in favor of peace, women's rights, etc. What implications, if any, does it have for us as individuals when we meet and interact with Muslims? What policy implications does your post imply?
you can think whatever you want.Which, again, doesn’t change the fact that, as I have throughly established, pretending Islam is some sort of unique case is utterly hypocritical.
You're thinking about Marxism.A militant desire to oppose any sort of religious thinking seems to be pretty freaking common amongst atheists
you can think whatever you want.
You're thinking about Marxism.
Yeah Marxism.No, I’m thinking about the fact that atheists happily committed mass murder in an effort to wipe out the “opiate of the masses”.
So what?Actually the point is not what Muslims or Christians did. They are people, human beings.
The point is what Islam demands, and is fully documented.
Christianity is a poor example when you are comparing religions for violence.
Christianity has two or three contraversial verses,
Islam has thousands, entire volumes of rob, rape, and kill.
So what? Therefore we should do what, other than be afraid?And what corruption of christianity are we speaking of. It is fully documented.
I know the Islam we are speaking of, and it is not a corruption, it is fully documented.
Nope, the various Christian Churches were onboard with colonialism from the get-go.....
++ Probably true about other faiths. Again, what's your point?The corruption of Islam is a good thing, it brings about peaceful Muslims.
It's Muslims who practice it as written who are dangerous.
++ Ditto those who follow Leviticus.
Most Muslims know little about Muhammed himself, relying on what is told to them.
And you trash Islam, but never say what we should do about this evil. And you lie about Islam by not speaking of the complete picture. What are the policy implications of Islamic teachings you complain about?There are two things that all you charter members of the Don't Blame Islam club have in common:
1. You accuse me (and others) of telling lies about Islam, but you NEVER provide an example (because you can't).
2. You say that terrorism (or "jihad" if you prefer) is a corruption of Islam, but you NEVER provide an example (because you can't).
Happy to discuss it if you would list an implication or two, a policy I should support. So far, nada.if you don't want to discuss the topic because it has no implications for you as an individual than goodbye
I'm not interested.Ha
Happy to discuss it if you would list an implicatio or two. So far, nada.
Correct. Now, how does that rebut what I said about the message and example of Jesus?
I think you should accept the fact, you are just not going to understand.++ Probably true about other faiths. Again, what's your point?
I can't understand your answer because you haven't given it. Did I miss something?I think you should accept the fact, you are just not going to understand.
And you trash Islam,
but never say what we should do about this evil.
And you lie about Islam by not speaking of the complete picture.
What are the policy implications of Islamic teachings you complain about?