- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 24,380
- Reaction score
- 7,805
- Location
- Worldwide
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
The Iraq War 2 illustrated how low Demokrats would go. They voted to send troops to battle because they did not want to be seen as the anti-military, anti-national security party they are.
They so much wanted to show the public their new colors that in the senate they asked for a second symbolic vote (just to make sure people understood they had new colors), and got it.
What did they then do? In an effort to damage a popular president, and when our troops needed their support the most... they double fisted a dagger in their backs. So much for the new colors... and what was that new color? Smoke... as in smoke screen.
Demokrats used a war vote for political expediency, and then turned on the troops... also for political expediency. That is about the most disgusting act an elected official can make. But that IS the modern Demokrat Party. They seriously lack morals.
The following article illustrates how Obama and his party will once again show they have no morals when it comes to seeking and acquiring power.
Zimmer notes in red
They so much wanted to show the public their new colors that in the senate they asked for a second symbolic vote (just to make sure people understood they had new colors), and got it.
What did they then do? In an effort to damage a popular president, and when our troops needed their support the most... they double fisted a dagger in their backs. So much for the new colors... and what was that new color? Smoke... as in smoke screen.
Demokrats used a war vote for political expediency, and then turned on the troops... also for political expediency. That is about the most disgusting act an elected official can make. But that IS the modern Demokrat Party. They seriously lack morals.
The following article illustrates how Obama and his party will once again show they have no morals when it comes to seeking and acquiring power.
Zimmer notes in red
The first rule for President Obama: It’s all about 2014. The second rule for President Obama: See Rule No. 1.
Make no mistake: The president couldn’t care less about the plight of Syrians, the 1,500 gassed to death — including nearly 500 children. It’s all about 2014. Win the House, reign supreme. (Zimmer note: If they didn't care about our troops, why would they care about the Syrians?)
The conventional wisdom is, as usual, wrong. Losing the congressional vote won’t be an embarrassment for the president, as all the talking heads are still parroting. A loss would be a double win. First, because a “No” vote would allow the foreign policy neophyte to walk away from his blundering “red line” declaration on chemical weapons (“I wanted to go in, but Congress said no”). And second, should Republicans who voted for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars now oppose Syria, the president would be armed with clear “evidence” that their opposition is purely political. (Zimmer note: Of course Obama will politicize it, just as he did when Osama was offed. Remember Demokrats once cried about politicizing 911... well... that works only one way.)
Keep in mind: This president knows no way to campaign other than to blame others. He’ll batter Republicans for all of 2014 as obstructionists should they be the reason the effort fails. (Zimmer note: And his Propaganda Ministry of discredited Journ-O-lists will happily chant along... Yes We Can)
Whatever happens, this much is clear: We’re no longer talking about the IRS targeting tea party groups, the Justice Department tapping reporters’ phone lines, the NSA’s surveillance programs, Benghazi. The president has smartly changed the subject to the most important decision a commander in chief makes: war.
And the most presidential. That, he knows, will play better in the midterm elections, whichever way Congress votes. (Zimmer note: And of course... the Propaganda Ministry will bury those other "stories" the best they can. )