Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Their #MeToo Hypocrisy
One of the most egregious examples of revisionism can be found in a column by the New York Times’ Michelle Goldberg, who employs nearly every attack Americans were warned never to use against alleged sexual-assault victims during the Kavanaugh hearings — questioning their motivations, asking why they didn’t file charges, attacking them for not remembering specifics, etc. And yet, even if we adopt Goldberg’s new standards, Tara Reade still emerges as a more credible accuser than Christine Blasey Ford.
The left's hypocrisy is unbelievably appalling. Unsurprisingly, no leftwing media outlet will even address it.
Checking in to see if Mashmont made a worthwhile thread.
...
Nope, he didn't. Moving on. :2wave:
Wrong forum, totally unrelated to covid19.
Oh, so now Conservatives believe what women say? That's a laugh..
Oh, so now Conservatives believe what women say? That's a laugh..
It doesn't matter. Nancy has spoken.
Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Their #MeToo Hypocrisy
One of the most egregious examples of revisionism can be found in a column by the New York Times’ Michelle Goldberg, who employs nearly every attack Americans were warned never to use against alleged sexual-assault victims during the Kavanaugh hearings — questioning their motivations, asking why they didn’t file charges, attacking them for not remembering specifics, etc. And yet, even if we adopt Goldberg’s new standards, Tara Reade still emerges as a more credible accuser than Christine Blasey Ford.
The left's hypocrisy is unbelievably appalling. Unsurprisingly, no leftwing media outlet will even address it.
"Tara Reade still emerges as a more credible accuser than Christine Blasey Ford" exemplifies the base and false statement.
Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Their #MeToo Hypocrisy
.
One of the most egregious examples of revisionism can be found in a column by the New York Times’ Michelle Goldberg, who employs nearly every attack Americans were warned never to use against alleged sexual-assault victims during the Kavanaugh hearings — questioning their motivations, asking why they didn’t file charges, attacking them for not remembering specifics, etc. And yet, even if we adopt Goldberg’s new standards, Tara Reade still emerges as a more credible accuser than Christine Blasey Ford.
The left's hypocrisy is unbelievably appalling. Unsurprisingly, no leftwing media outlet will even address it.
The one thing I have noticed about Trump's supporters is they avoid discussing Trump. They must avoid at all costs dealing with Trump in real time, what Trump is currently doing, saying, and tweeting.
Instead they talk about liberals, revisionist history, Kavanaugh, Tara Reade, and Joe Biden's sex life.
But never anything about Trump in the here and now.
Why is that?
The one thing I have noticed about Trump's supporters is they avoid discussing Trump. They must avoid at all costs dealing with Trump in real time, what Trump is currently doing, saying, and tweeting.
Instead they talk about liberals, revisionist history, Kavanaugh, Tara Reade, and Joe Biden's sex life.
But never anything about Trump in the here and now.
Why is that?
We all know the answer to that one, including Trump's fans.
We believe them when they have evidence, but not when they're paid to make up stuff right before an important hearing or election.
I hope you understand the difference.
Where is Tara's evidence and the girl who said Biden put the finger drill in her at 14?
"Tara Reade still emerges as a more credible accuser than Christine Blasey Ford" exemplifies the base and false statement.
Unlike with Blasey Ford, there is corroboration, and there are accounts of the event at the time.
There is also people who were actually at the event that denied Tara was there...It didn't help kick Kavanaugh to the curb and neither will it kick Biden.
There is nobody who can verify, nor any proof that Blasey Ford ever met Kavanaugh. There is no corroboration past or present. There is not a shred of evidence this ever happened. No exact time, location, or story. There is NOTHING.
Obviously Mashmont point was right on, double standard hypocrisy of the left, because you failed to provide any reasonable argument. In fact you have no argument.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?