• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.[W:158]

Mashmont

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
18,604
Reaction score
1,541
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Their #MeToo Hypocrisy

One of the most egregious examples of revisionism can be found in a column by the New York Times’ Michelle Goldberg, who employs nearly every attack Americans were warned never to use against alleged sexual-assault victims during the Kavanaugh hearings — questioning their motivations, asking why they didn’t file charges, attacking them for not remembering specifics, etc. And yet, even if we adopt Goldberg’s new standards, Tara Reade still emerges as a more credible accuser than Christine Blasey Ford.

The left's hypocrisy is unbelievably appalling. Unsurprisingly, no leftwing media outlet will even address it.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

Wrong forum, totally unrelated to covid19.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

Checking in to see if Mashmont made a worthwhile thread.

...
Nope, he didn't. Moving on. :2wave:
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.


It doesn't matter. Nancy has spoken.

 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

Moderator's Warning:
moved to different forum
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

Checking in to see if Mashmont made a worthwhile thread.

...
Nope, he didn't. Moving on. :2wave:

Obviously Mashmont point was right on, double standard hypocrisy of the left, because you failed to provide any reasonable argument. In fact you have no argument.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

Wrong forum, totally unrelated to covid19.

Why not respond to it, instead of whining about it’s location in the forum?
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

Liberals keep trying to re-write history to their liking ever since I took note of politics in 1952.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

Oh, so now Conservatives believe what women say? That's a laugh..
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

Oh, so now Conservatives believe what women say? That's a laugh..

We believe them when they have evidence, but not when they're paid to make up stuff right before an important hearing or election.

I hope you understand the difference.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

Oh, so now Conservatives believe what women say? That's a laugh..

To be fair, the vast bulk of them always believed women when said women were accusing a target on the left. Those right wingers just sort of innocently forgot about this brave moral stand when someone on the right was accused.

How else could so many here on DP be capable of typing with a straight face that because Biden said "believe women", everyone who votes for Biden is a hypocrite, and especially so when not voting for Biden helps Trump either directly (voting for Trump) or indirectly (not a vote for his opponent)? Hell, I've even seen DP right wingers who say they don't believe Reade still playing that game.
 
Last edited:
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

It doesn't matter. Nancy has spoken.


Nancy Facelift is a disgusting wealthy leftwinger who really believes the rules don't apply to her self-righteous self or her party. She profits from the system she claims to hate. She is pro-baby killing, yet claims to be a devout Catholic. If you question her hypocrisy, she becomes VERY indignant. I don't judge people, but I'll just charitably say I sure wouldn't want to trade places with her after she dies. She is 100% evil.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.


Why is this a surprise or any different than the last time liberals had political objectives?
Seems to be a long term and on going behavior trait of theirs. :shrug:
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

"Tara Reade still emerges as a more credible accuser than Christine Blasey Ford" exemplifies the base and false statement.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

"Tara Reade still emerges as a more credible accuser than Christine Blasey Ford" exemplifies the base and false statement.

Agreed. More credible, and still, there are questions and doubts about her story and her history.

A lot of them echo the same questions and doubts about Christine Blasey Ford's story and history.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.


The one thing I have noticed about Trump's supporters is they avoid discussing Trump. They must avoid at all costs dealing with Trump in real time, what Trump is currently doing, saying, and tweeting.

Instead they talk about liberals, revisionist history, Kavanaugh, Tara Reade, and Joe Biden's sex life.

But never anything about Trump in the here and now.

Why is that?

We all know the answer to that one, including Trump's fans.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.


Maybe because the thread is about the hypocrisy of the left dealing with accusations against Kavanaugh vs accusations against Biden. But we all noticed how no one on the left can discuss any topic without bringing Trump into it.

Why is that?
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.


Sure. I'll discuss Trump. He's been the most successful president in many decades. His instincts are right on the money. He's done a great job appointing conservative judges all over the country, and he's been very strong on this virus. There. Anything else?

But the topic is Biden and the left's hypocrisy.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

We believe them when they have evidence, but not when they're paid to make up stuff right before an important hearing or election.

I hope you understand the difference.

Where is Tara's evidence and the girl who said Biden put the finger drill in her at 14?
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

Where is Tara's evidence and the girl who said Biden put the finger drill in her at 14?

Unlike with Blasey Ford, there is corroboration, and there are accounts of the event at the time.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

"Tara Reade still emerges as a more credible accuser than Christine Blasey Ford" exemplifies the base and false statement.

there are still doubts on both of their stories. But less doubts on Tara's story than Ford's
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

Unlike with Blasey Ford, there is corroboration, and there are accounts of the event at the time.

There is also people who were actually at the event that denied Tara was there...It didn't help kick Kavanaugh to the curb and neither will it kick Biden.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

There is also people who were actually at the event that denied Tara was there...It didn't help kick Kavanaugh to the curb and neither will it kick Biden.

There is nobody who can verify, nor any proof that Blasey Ford ever met Kavanaugh. There is no corroboration past or present. There is not a shred of evidence this ever happened. No exact time, location, or story. There is NOTHING.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

There is nobody who can verify, nor any proof that Blasey Ford ever met Kavanaugh. There is no corroboration past or present. There is not a shred of evidence this ever happened. No exact time, location, or story. There is NOTHING.

Usually they are like that the ones filed against me when I was in management of a corporate location.
 
Re: Liberals Rewrite History to Justify Metoo.

Obviously Mashmont point was right on, double standard hypocrisy of the left, because you failed to provide any reasonable argument. In fact you have no argument.

Intelligent arguments will be supplied to intelligent threads, which this thread was not.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…