• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Liberals Embrace the Smug Life

There are two types of Progressive Liberals:

1.Socialists attempting to lie about what they are.

2.Useful Idiots who join up because they think it’s cool or they like a social issue (abortion, gay rights). But they don’t realize they are giving support to the most destructive political/economic ideology the world has ever seen.

A close examination of the governing platforms of both Socialism and Communism shows the absolute only difference between the two is Socialist try to claim they can function without a Totalitarian Dictatorship.

The problem with that is Socialism is so antithetical to human nature that people have to be forced to do it. This can only happen with an all powerful centralized government controlling everything AKA a Totalitarian Dictatorship.

Courtesy of CaptainCourtesy:


There are two types of people who, though not being liberal, try to define liberals:

1) Uneducated conservatives who, since they are illiterate, have learned everything they know about liberalism from watching right wing pundits on TV.
2) Stupid right wing hacks for whom the extent of their political intelligence is 'right wing good, left wing bad'. These people tend to avoid watching the pundits because they use too many 'fancy' words like 'the'.

This is not all conservatives, but for both of these groups of people, it is important to remember that their opinion is meaningless, since, as one can see from points 1 and 2, they are incapable of defining the term that they are attempting to define."
 
Last edited:
There are two types of Progressive Liberals:

1. Socialists attempting to lie about what they are.

2. Useful Idiots who join up because they think it’s cool or they like a social issue (abortion, gay rights). But they don’t realize they are giving support to the most destructive political/economic ideology the world has ever seen.

A close examination of the governing platforms of both Socialism and Communism shows the absolute only difference between the two is Socialist try to claim they can function without a Totalitarian Dictatorship.

The problem with that is Socialism is so antithetical to human nature that people have to be forced to do it. This can only happen with an all powerful centralized government controlling everything AKA a Totalitarian Dictatorship.

There are two types of libertarians:

1: stoned college kids
2: stoned college dropouts
 
Why did you post this OP from your thread into this one? We've already been over this.

. It's on subject for this thread. I wrote it myself, it's not some other persons quote. Its the most accurate definition of today's American left I have ever seen. I have posted it dozens of times on other debate sites. I have never had a Leftist successfully argue it down.
 
. It's on subject for this thread. I wrote it myself, it's not some other persons quote. Its the most accurate definition of today's American left I have ever seen. I have posted it dozens of times on other debate sites. I have never had a Leftist successfully argue it down.
Oh no, it's been refuted already.


Courtesy of CaptainCourtesy:


"There are two types of people who, though not being liberal, try to define liberals:

1) Uneducated conservatives who, since they are illiterate, have learned everything they know about liberalism from watching right wing pundits on TV.
2) Stupid right wing hacks for whom the extent of their political intelligence is 'right wing good, left wing bad'. These people tend to avoid watching the pundits because they use too many 'fancy' words like 'the'.

This is not all conservatives, but for both of these groups of people, it is important to remember that their opinion is meaningless, since, as one can see from points 1 and 2, they are incapable of defining the term that they are attempting to define."
 
There's that whining sound again. Hear it, over there to the right?
It seems like the only participation conservatives can find for themselves in society is to complain about liberals, what liberals say, what liberals do.
It's become the right whinge. You guys are right whingers.

whinge
(h)winj/
verb
1. complain persistently and in a peevish or irritating way.

LOL, that's great. I never knew that was an actual word. Seen it written many times and just thought it was a sarcastic misspelling of of "whine." I see the meanings ARE the same, although 'whine' can refer only to a sound, such as the whine of an engine... Thanks!
 
The Left did NOT win the Presidential Elections, they used massive voter fraud to STEAL the elections!

-
Do I understand correctly? You're claiming the American Presidential election is fraudulent? You can provide proof of your assertion?
 
So right wingers are acting just like left wingers now?

Left wingers do, right whingers complain about what left wingers do.
 
Oh no, it's been refuted already.


Courtesy of CaptainCourtesy:


"There are two types of people who, though not being liberal, try to define liberals:

1) Uneducated conservatives who, since they are illiterate, have learned everything they know about liberalism from watching right wing pundits on TV.
2) Stupid right wing hacks for whom the extent of their political intelligence is 'right wing good, left wing bad'. These people tend to avoid watching the pundits because they use too many 'fancy' words like 'the'.

This is not all conservatives, but for both of these groups of people, it is important to remember that their opinion is meaningless, since, as one can see from points 1 and 2, they are incapable of defining the term that they are attempting to define."

3.) People that have spent too much talking to liberals about politics and have concluded that liberals really are terrible.
 
Also sprach Vox, the young people's liberal zine, who scored this spectacular own goal:



Wow.



Whow. A fundamental failure of empathy on the part of progressives. Maybe they should do something to help the working class people they claim to represent rather than pouring scorn on them.

Liberals embrace the smug life | New York Post

Ha. So great.

"Those liberals are so darned smug for thinking that they are smarter! Well they're not, we are so much smarter than them!"

:lamo
 
LOL, that's great. I never knew that was an actual word. Seen it written many times and just thought it was a sarcastic misspelling of of "whine." I see the meanings ARE the same, although 'whine' can refer only to a sound, such as the whine of an engine... Thanks!

(grin!)
Back in the Usenet days I used to hang out in a couple newsgroups that were full of Brits, picked up a couple of their terms, I guess.
 
Courtesy of CaptainCourtesy:


There are two types of people who, though not being liberal, try to define liberals:

1) Uneducated conservatives who, since they are illiterate, have learned everything they know about liberalism from watching right wing pundits on TV.
2) Stupid right wing hacks for whom the extent of their political intelligence is 'right wing good, left wing bad'. These people tend to avoid watching the pundits because they use too many 'fancy' words like 'the'.

This is not all conservatives, but for both of these groups of people, it is important to remember that their opinion is meaningless, since, as one can see from points 1 and 2, they are incapable of defining the term that they are attempting to define."

feel free to specify what i go wrong?
 
Courtesy of CaptainCourtesy:


There are two types of people who, though not being liberal, try to define liberals:

1) Uneducated conservatives who, since they are illiterate, have learned everything they know about liberalism from watching right wing pundits on TV.
2) Stupid right wing hacks for whom the extent of their political intelligence is 'right wing good, left wing bad'. These people tend to avoid watching the pundits because they use too many 'fancy' words like 'the'.

This is not all conservatives, but for both of these groups of people, it is important to remember that their opinion is meaningless, since, as one can see from points 1 and 2, they are incapable of defining the term that they are attempting to define."

I notice you dont specify what i got wrong
 
Oh no, it's been refuted already.


Courtesy of CaptainCourtesy:


"There are two types of people who, though not being liberal, try to define liberals:

1) Uneducated conservatives who, since they are illiterate, have learned everything they know about liberalism from watching right wing pundits on TV.
2) Stupid right wing hacks for whom the extent of their political intelligence is 'right wing good, left wing bad'. These people tend to avoid watching the pundits because they use too many 'fancy' words like 'the'.

This is not all conservatives, but for both of these groups of people, it is important to remember that their opinion is meaningless, since, as one can see from points 1 and 2, they are incapable of defining the term that they are attempting to define."

Limited Power Govt and Free Market Capitalism have made America the greatest most prosperous nation in all human history. The Right wing wants to maintain this. The Left wing wants to undo this. So "Right Wing Good / Left Wing Bad" is accurate.
 
Last edited:
Also sprach Vox, the young people's liberal zine, who scored this spectacular own goal:



Wow.



Whow. A fundamental failure of empathy on the part of progressives. Maybe they should do something to help the working class people they claim to represent rather than pouring scorn on them.

Liberals embrace the smug life | New York Post

And conservatives are better? Oh wait...that's not even mentioned. Lol
 
Do I understand correctly? You're claiming the American Presidential election is fraudulent? You can provide proof of your assertion?

vHeMUGk.gif
 
Limited Power Govt and Free Market Capitalism have made America the greatest most prosperous nation in all human history. The Right wing wants to maintain this. The Left wing wants to undo this. So "Right Wing Good / Left Wing Bad" is accurate.

Bwaaahahahahahahahahahahaha

The "right wing" is just as big government, big brother, big interventionism, big debt, big corporation as the "left wing". Nothing but status quo, corporate hacks.
 
Bwaaahahahahahahahahahahaha

The "right wing" is just as big government, big brother, big interventionism, big debt, big corporation as the "left wing". Nothing but status quo, corporate hacks.

Yep. Opposite sides if the same ****ing coin.
 
There are two types of Progressive Liberals:

1. Socialists attempting to lie about what they are.

2. Useful Idiots who join up because they think it’s cool or they like a social issue (abortion, gay rights). But they don’t realize they are giving support to the most destructive political/economic ideology the world has ever seen.

A close examination of the governing platforms of both Socialism and Communism shows the absolute only difference between the two is Socialist try to claim they can function without a Totalitarian Dictatorship.

The problem with that is Socialism is so antithetical to human nature that people have to be forced to do it. This can only happen with an all powerful centralized government controlling everything AKA a Totalitarian Dictatorship.

feel free to specify what i go wrong?

All of it.
 
Back
Top Bottom