• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Liberalism is a religion

Rob1978

New member
Joined
Jul 23, 2005
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Wouldn't you call Liberalism a religion? I call it "Humanism". They pray at the alter of "white guilt", their seminaries are liberal universities, their God is them, and their Church is the Supreme Court.
 
And you are filled with hate for those who deem themselves liberal?

Honestly, why should I waste my time with you? Can you give me a reason? You mock what I believe in and then expect a logical response? Ah, the silent treatment, that's alright. Really, it is alright, because your idiocy speaks for itself. Why do you feel the need to hate anyone, or is it just inherent? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and bet that your parents hated liberals and therefore you grew up hating liberals-so there, it really isn't your fault you hate me. Doesn't that make you feel better? Want a cookie?
 
It's just way the hell over your head, pal.

A conservative trying to understand a liberal is like a dog trying to understand its master.
 
PerryLogan said:
It's just way the hell over your head, pal.

A conservative trying to understand a liberal is like a dog trying to understand its master.
This is pure, unadulterated liberalism. But sometimes, dogs bite...
 
And yet another thread that should have been in The Basement.

What's so hard to understand about debate? You present a thesis and then back it up with facts. That's it.
Pretty damn straigh forward.

None of these, "We Rule. They Drool," threads are debates. They're mostly merely mental wanking.

If this had been an actual debate it would have included definitions of liberalism, religion, and humanism, and then would have had citations of facts to support the thesis presented.

Oh yeah this reminds, me, there's an essay coming out in the Aug 29 edition of American Conservative magazine about "How the Right Got Bigger & Dumber." I recommend it to everyone.

To be fair, this just one of numerous "We Rule. They Drool," threads that have made their appearance here. The 'We' and the 'They' in the threads are not always the same, but the threads are always almost entirely devoid of content beyond some variation of "\/\/3 Ru|3. Th3y |)r00|."
 
Last edited:
I still want to know his response to mine...cause I have a site if he wants a cookie...

Cookie Site
 
Simon W. Moon said:
Oh yeah this reminds, me, there's an essay coming out in the Aug 29 edition of American Conservative magazine about "How the Right Got Bigger & Dumber." I recommend it to everyone.
From that upcoming issue: "Defining Conservatism Down"




 
Honestly, why should I waste my time with you? Can you give me a reason?

Yes, I’ll give you a reason using my exceptional insightful abilities. Actually, a better way to ask your questions would be “why am I wasting my time with you”? You allowed your foolishness and imbecility to have a significant influence upon your reasoning. Hence giving you the inability to see that you had already answered your question. As you said “You mock what I believe in…”. That quote not only answers your question, but furthermore you felt the profound desire to respond. Hence allowing you to defend your so-called beliefs.

You mock what I believe in and then expect a logical response?

In all honesty I never expected a logical response. Question; What the hell were you thinking when drawing up that conclusion? My post was nothing more than a dime-story escapade. Apparently, you lacked the ability to interpret the jest and folly imbedded within my post. I clearly implied the jest and folly. However, your sub-moronic conclusion came of no surprise to me. Taking into mind your idiocy, I was surprised your post wasn’t anymore tedious than it already is.

Really, it is alright, because your idiocy speaks for itself.

I appreciate your petty attempt to belittle me. I’ll admit that folly was the base of my temporary reasoning imbedded within my original post. According to your meager, dime-story analysis, you believed that folly was the base of my intelligence rather than my temporary reasoning.
Now, there’s nothing wrong with being simple-minded. Your mental impairment shouldn’t keep you from living a happy and productive life. But let me give you some advice; keep your simple-mind away from afflictive arguments such as this one. Please do heed my advice, for there are adverse effects in which your mentally impaired mind may suffer.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and bet that your parents hated liberals and therefore you grew up hating liberals-so there

Please reflect upon America’s history before attempting to impress with your so-called insight. The democratic party has not always been socialistic. Back in the days of my parents, the democratic party gave benefits to America’s workers rather than giving benefits to Americans on welfare. My own Mother is a democrat.
It's the socialist I feel a touch of hatred for, not the unionists.
Once again, I have the opportunity to rant on your pee-brained intelligence.
But I think I’ve clearly gotten my analysis through your skull. Hence I’ll spare you from another ranting.
 
Last edited:
I'd like to request that this thread be moved to the basement forum.
 
Oh, you jest do you? Alright, let's take this to the basement, I am ready!

I would never have responded seriously, but hey, you want to, I am all for it! Let the mutual belittling begin!
 
Back
Top Bottom