• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Liberal McCarthyism (1 Viewer)

Gill

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 5, 2005
Messages
8,713
Reaction score
1,907
Location
The Derby City
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
WASHINGTON--My brief and unhappy experience with the hate and vitriol of bloggers on the liberal side of the aisle comes from the last several months I spent campaigning for a longtime friend, Joe Lieberman.

This kind of scary hatred, my dad used to tell me, comes only from the right wing--in his day from people such as the late Sen. Joseph McCarthy, with his tirades against "communists and their fellow travelers." The word "McCarthyism" became a red flag for liberals, signifying the far right's fascistic tactics of labeling anyone a "communist" or "socialist" who favored an active federal government to help the middle class and the poor, and to level the playing field.

I came to believe that we liberals couldn't possibly be so intolerant and hateful, because our ideology was famous for ACLU-type commitments to free speech, dissent and, especially, tolerance for those who differed with us. And in recent years--with the deadly combination of sanctimony and vitriol displayed by the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter and Michael Savage--I held on to the view that the left was inherently more tolerant and less hateful than the right.

Now, in the closing days of the Lieberman primary campaign, I have reluctantly concluded that I was wrong. The far right does not have a monopoly on bigotry and hatred and sanctimony.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008763

The author of this article blasting liberals.... that famous neo-con, Lanny Davis.
 
That's a very good commentary, although it surprised me to see who wrote it.

I've maintained for several years that Howard Dean was the Democrat party's experiment with physician-assisted suicide, and it seems that Lanny is coming around to my point of view. I'm not sorry to see it happen though; maybe now the Dems will take such a beating that they will reassess, and become a party of reasonable alternatives once more.
 
Err..."Breaking News" doesn't seem to be the best forum for an opinion piece.
 
Pen said:
Err..."Breaking News" doesn't seem to be the best forum for an opinion piece.
The demonetization of Lieberman by the liberal wing of the democratic party is breaking news. I thought it was refreshing to see someone like Lanny Davis speak out against it.

I noticed that Jessie Jackson had not one word to say when an ardent supporter of Lamont posted a picture of Lieberman in blackface last week. Jackson's silence speaks volumes.
 
He is right on the money except he uses the wrong term. It isn't liberals who are blasting Lieberman, but the antisemitic leftists. His calling them liberals is rather like calling those like Auftrag, Uncle and White at this forum here, "conservatives". True, perhaps, in the loosest possible way, but that would only be if one viewed politics as dichotomous where one had to be one or the other.

Heck -- just look around in this forum and you will see the old style raving right wing haters agreeing with the new style raving left wing haters, as the likes of "White" are quick to prop up antisemitic opinon pieces by the uberleftist George Galloway and others, and the uberleftists adding to the chorus of hatred by agreeing with the old guard racist right.

I think it is pretty much self-evident, and if people would simply open their eyes after perusing this or any other political board, they would see the same thing. Yes, the writeris certainly correct, but I just wish we could get past these one dimensional labels called "conservative" and "liberal". In far too many cases, people attach themselves to these labels as if declaring fealty to a sports team and as long as something is packaged as "conservative" or "liberal", they support it -- and this despite the fact that in all too many cases what is being packaged is far from liberal and far from conservative.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom