But Clarence Thomas, the most outspokenly, sometimes seemingly crazed, of them did not restrain himself, and very reasonably stated, again the quiet part outload - that now having removed the foundation for all of those rights, rights to contraception, rights to same-sex relationships and marriage, should all be reversed (he used the phrase 'revisited' IIRC, which means reversed).
(Surprisingly, he left one off of his list, the right to inter-racial marriage. An oversight, no doubt).
Legal experts I've seen agree, that the court has left little option but to either reverse right after right, following the foundation it laid of rejecting the unenumerated underlying right used for all of those rights, or to be clearly hypocritical, picking and choosing how to apply its legal doctrines based on politics, leaving the rights untouched but without any legal foundation.
They predict that conservative groups will waste no time creating cases to overturn each of those other rights for the court.
So, what's reasonable to expect? That a court made of hand-picked Justices for views that include the right-wing Catholic social views will continue to flex its power and be consistent in its legal doctrine and overturn more rights with the same logic now that the 'hardest' one is done, as Thomas calls for; or that the Republican politicians making politically convenient claims before the mid-terms that it won't happen, trying to minimize the electoral harm from the ruling while having enjoy the benefits it has provided for decades, are right? After all, LOSING votes from the ruling would defeat the reason they arranged for it.
Such is the complexity of Republicans desperately seeking votes and voting blocks.
Getting benefits by pandering to a group, while losing votes from their opponents, hoping to maximize the turnout of the voters grateful to them and to minimize the votes lost from the backlash. What do think will happen - more rights reversed by this court, or that they'll only apply their legal doctrine to one right, leaving inconsistencies?