You have 5,000 characters to state your opinion if you choose. The rules of this forum are found
here.
Unreservedly pro. The Drug War as a whole is a failure, but in the specific case of marijuana, there's not even any particularly logical reason for its prohibition.
I can clearly understand why something like heroin or meth has a rather complex set of considerations involved, and prohibition may be a tempting solution (though I still don't think it's necessarily the right one).
But I can't for the life of me understand why weed would fall into that camp.
Marijuana is not chemically addictive. It has no potential for lethality. It doesn't cause violent behavior (beyond that which are associated with cartels due to prohibition itself). Gateway theory has been soundly disproved over and over again. Someone who smokes pot is no more likely to progress to harder drugs than someone who drinks. Cigarettes and poverty are actually more correlated with hard drug use than either one of those. So... why?
In a measurement of risk, marijuana is clearly safer than alcohol, and rather debatable with cigarettes due to its high addiction potential -- both legal drugs, and ones which addict and kill millions of Americans every year.
There are people who abuse marijuana, there are risks that can occur due to said abuse, and it is not any safer to, say, operate a vehicle while high, than it is while drunk. No drug is "harmless." Anything that alters the brain has risks. On that note, we really need a better marijuana test that can detect recent use, not just use from any time this month, so that we can actually enforce punishments on people who drive while impaired.
But when taken as a whole, marijuana is certainly one of the safer drugs. I really can't see any logical reason for it to be banned. Hell, in a world where both alcohol and marijuana were legal, and I had a teenaged kid, I'd probably prefer for them to eat pot brownies over getting drunk. Less risk of winding up unconscious.
I've always found it sort of funny that people who probably drink on a semi-regular basis say stuff like people who get high on weekends are "losers looking for escape." It's just another drug, and you're still ****ed up when you're drunk just like you would be when you're baked. I'm sure people said the same thing about people like you during alcohol prohibition. And what's more, you're probably louder and more annoying than most stoners when you're drunk.
Messing with your brain a bit is a millenia-old human tradition. It's just something some people do for fun or bonding. It's not going away, it's not inherently bad, and we do ourselves no favors by pouring endless money into a fool's errand that doesn't even have a coherent reason why we pursue it.
Before anyone asks: no, I don't smoke pot. I don't like it, actually. I'm not a huge fan of drugs generally -- I'm an infrequent and light drinker. It's just that it's plain to see, given any reasonably significant analysis, that marijuana just isn't a dangerous drug.