Leader of al-Qaida in Iraq mocks Bush (1 Viewer)

[KidRocks]

AHA!

Here we have proof that al-Qaeda does not want any American troop withdrawal... period!

"We haven't had enough of your blood yet," taunted terror chieftain Abu Hamza al-Muhajir, identified as the speaker on the tape.

Just as I have been saying all along, President Bush hand delivered our sons and daughters to Iraq for the insurgents (and now al-Qaeda) to pick off and kill systematically, nearly 3000 dead American troops now.

Why come to America (nearly impossible anyway) to fight, when Bush chose their backyard to put our brave troops in harms way? They love it, al-Qaeda loves it!

I told you so, they want us there, they want Bush to "stay the course"!

They've always wanted that!

You can't get any stupider than Bush is how the insurgents, al-Qaeda, and terrorists worldwide feel.

Can't you Republicans see that?










http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/world/4327384.html

BAGHDAD, Iraq — A new recording Friday attributed to the leader of al-Qaida in Iraq mocked President Bush as a coward whose conduct of the war was rejected at the polls, challenging him to keep U.S. troops in the country to face more bloodshed.

"We haven't had enough of your blood yet," taunted terror chieftain Abu Hamza al-Muhajir, identified as the speaker on the tape.

He gloated over Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's resignation, claimed to have 12,000 fighters under his command who "have vowed to die for God's sake," and said his fighters will not rest until they blow up the White House and occupy Jerusalem.

It was impossible to verify the authenticity of the 20-minute recording, posted on a Web site used by Islamic militants. The CIA said technical analysis was being conducted on the tape.

Al-Muhajir, an Egyptian also known as Abu Ayyub al-Masri, boasted that al-Qaida in Iraq is moving toward victory faster than expected because of Bush's mistakes...

 

[jfuh]

Bush is the best thing that happened for AQ.
9/11 was not a failure of us not fighting these guys over there. 9/11 was a failure of us being far too lax on security in general of our own ports and borders. These morons want a war and that's exactly what we gave them.
Till today it seems that we are still failing to protect it. Apparently the same amount of illegal items smuggled aboard planes pre911 are the same today.

How do we fix this?

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

AHA!

Here we have proof that al-Qaeda does not want any American troop withdrawal... period!



Just as I have been saying all along, President Bush hand delivered our sons and daughters to Iraq for the insurgents (and now al-Qaeda) to pick off and kill systematically, nearly 3000 dead American troops now.

Why come to America (nearly impossible anyway) to fight, when Bush chose their backyard to put our brave troops in harms way? They love it, al-Qaeda loves it!

I told you so, they want us there, they want Bush to "stay the course"!

They've always wanted that!

You can't get any stupider than Bush is how the insurgents, al-Qaeda, and terrorists worldwide feel.

Can't you Republicans see that?










http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/world/4327384.html

BAGHDAD, Iraq — A new recording Friday attributed to the leader of al-Qaida in Iraq mocked President Bush as a coward whose conduct of the war was rejected at the polls, challenging him to keep U.S. troops in the country to face more bloodshed.

"We haven't had enough of your blood yet," taunted terror chieftain Abu Hamza al-Muhajir, identified as the speaker on the tape.

He gloated over Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's resignation, claimed to have 12,000 fighters under his command who "have vowed to die for God's sake," and said his fighters will not rest until they blow up the White House and occupy Jerusalem.

It was impossible to verify the authenticity of the 20-minute recording, posted on a Web site used by Islamic militants. The CIA said technical analysis was being conducted on the tape.

Al-Muhajir, an Egyptian also known as Abu Ayyub al-Masri, boasted that al-Qaida in Iraq is moving toward victory faster than expected because of Bush's mistakes...

Then why in the same speech did the praise the Democrats election win?

 

[CurrentAffairs]

How do we fix this?

You guys have the power now. Let's hear your solutions.

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

You guys have the power now. Let's hear your solutions.

surrender and appeasement

 

[KidRocks]

You guys have the power now. Let's hear your solutions.

Can't you hear?

Cannot you read?

We have been asking for years now for Bush to set timetables, benchmarks, or whatever the hell you want to call them.

I myself have stated that we shold tell the Iraqi gov't and the Iraqi army to get it's act together soon (within 2 years) because we are leaving come hell or highwater!

And then we leave.

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

Can't you hear?

Cannot you read?

We have been asking for years now for Bush to set timetables, benchmarks, or whatever the hell you want to call them.

I myself have stated that we shold tell the Iraqi gov't and the Iraqi army to get it's act together soon (within 2 years) because we are leaving come hell or highwater!

And then we leave.

Has their ever been a war fought in the history of the world in which you told the enemy when you will be leaving? You can not fight a war based on a deadline, this is one of the most asenine things ever to come out of the Democratic talking points in the history of the party, and that's saying alot.

 

[KidRocks]

surrender and appeasement

Better then 3000 more needless deaths of our troops, isn't it?

Nah, nevermind, you guys aren't really concerned about that are you?

It seems it's all about Bush to you people! It's all about your politically-correct aganda.

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

Better then 3000 more needless deaths of our troops, isn't it?

Actually no it's not considering the fact that the NIE says that if the jihadis percieve a victory in Iraq it will inspire them to carry out attacks against the United States, and the fact that our cut and run from Somalia is what influenced OBL into thinking the U.S. is nothing more than a paper tiger which can't withstand any loss of life which cemented the idea that he could attack us with impunity and we wouldn't respond. We lost 30,000 soldiers in the battle of okinawa alone thankgod you type of people weren't alive back then or we'de all be speaking German and Japanese now. And don't you dare pretend to care about the troops you only feign that when it suits your argument, the rest of the time you're calling them war criminals.

Nah, nevermind, you guys aren't really concerned about that are you?

It seems it's all about Bush to you people! It's all about your politically-correct aganda.

And to you and your useful idiot left it is all about aiding and abetting the enemy, surrender, and appeasement.

 

[jfuh]

You guys have the power now. Let's hear your solutions.

Simple, adopt all the recommendations of the 9/11 commission. BTW, no I'm not in charge. Again you're confusing political ideology with political party.

 

[CurrentAffairs]

Simple, adopt all the recommendations of the 9/11 commission. BTW, no I'm not in charge. Again you're confusing political ideology with political party.

:rofl Your 'ideology' screams one particular party. You're fooling no one.

 

[jamesrage]

AHA!

Here we have proof that al-Qaeda does not want any American troop withdrawal... period!



Just as I have been saying all along, President Bush hand delivered our sons and daughters to Iraq for the insurgents (and now al-Qaeda) to pick off and kill systematically, nearly 3000 dead American troops now.

Why come to America (nearly impossible anyway) to fight, when Bush chose their backyard to put our brave troops in harms way? They love it, al-Qaeda loves it!

I told you so, they want us there, they want Bush to "stay the course"!

They've always wanted that!

You can't get any stupider than Bush is how the insurgents, al-Qaeda, and terrorists worldwide feel.

Can't you Republicans see that?










http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/world/4327384.html

BAGHDAD, Iraq — A new recording Friday attributed to the leader of al-Qaida in Iraq mocked President Bush as a coward whose conduct of the war was rejected at the polls, challenging him to keep U.S. troops in the country to face more bloodshed.

"We haven't had enough of your blood yet," taunted terror chieftain Abu Hamza al-Muhajir, identified as the speaker on the tape.

He gloated over Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's resignation, claimed to have 12,000 fighters under his command who "have vowed to die for God's sake," and said his fighters will not rest until they blow up the White House and occupy Jerusalem.

It was impossible to verify the authenticity of the 20-minute recording, posted on a Web site used by Islamic militants. The CIA said technical analysis was being conducted on the tape.

Al-Muhajir, an Egyptian also known as Abu Ayyub al-Masri, boasted that al-Qaida in Iraq is moving toward victory faster than expected because of Bush's mistakes...

So whats the point of the article,That the majority of Bush bashers are spewing what terrorist are saying?Thats not really news.We already knew that.

 

[CurrentAffairs]

:rofl

I don't care what'cha say, that's funny, right there.

 

[Stinger]

Simple, adopt all the recommendations of the 9/11 commission.

Be specific, which ones that haven't been adopted yet will defeat the Islamic Terrorist we are fighting? Which ones will insure a stable government in Iraq? What exactly does the 9/11 commission say about the military strategy in Iraq?

BTW, no I'm not in charge.

But you have a voice and have critized the Bush adminsitration incessantly, so what is the plan for IRAQ?

 

[jamesrage]

:rofl

I don't care what'cha say, that's funny, right there.

Here is the animated version.

 

[RightOfCenter]

Oh yeah, cause that'd work :roll:

We're gonna be leaving on January 31st!
Ok, so what you're saying is that we only need to preserve the integrity of our groups till then, and then we can take over the country?
No, because the Iraqi government will stand up!
Well, if you were so sure of that, then why do you have to set the time table to leave?
Ummm.........

I know liberals have trouble with answers that involve hard work and sacrifice, but that's how the cookie crumbles. We can leave Iraq and **** over the region far worse than it was, or we can stay until the mission in finished. If we're not gonna stay until we win, then timetables are just pointless political bullshit, if we're gonna lose, we might as well all pull out now. There is no use in *****footing around it.

Exactly what I was thinking. We either completely pull out NOW or we stay in Iraq until it will not be a liability to the region or the world. The Iraq war is a mistake and we have only made a bad situation worse, but setting a deadline for leaving would make a bad situation horendous!

 

[CurrentAffairs]

setting a deadline for leaving would make a bad situation horendous!

Agreed. If I were calling the shots for the terrorists, I'd cease fire right now and wait. al-Queda's enemy will soon turn tail and run off.

 

[KidRocks]

Agreed. If I were calling the shots for the terrorists, I'd cease fire right now and wait. al-Queda's enemy will soon turn tail and run off.

Yes, and how many American troops lives are you willing to sacrifice?
Hmmm? How many? Because you see, and I really don't take any pleasure in saying this but the fact is that we are not going to win in Iraq! Period!


Never, and you heard it here first! Hell, even the British couldn't rule Iraq for long a long, long, time ago!

Now, the question is... how many American lives are you willing to sacrifice in Iraq till you get the message, 3000?, 5000?, 10,000?

The Iraqi army will never stand up, never!

Now, the question is again... how many American lives are you willing to sacrifice in Iraq till you get the message, 3000?, 5000?, 10,000?

 

[talloulou]

"We haven't had enough of your blood yet," taunted terror chieftain Abu Hamza al-Muhajir, identified as the speaker on the tape.

He gloated over Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's resignation, claimed to have 12,000 fighters under his command who "have vowed to die for God's sake," and said his fighters will not rest until they blow up the White House and occupy Jerusalem.

They're acting macho so they look like winners and in my opinion if we pack up and leave Iraq they are the winners and seeing how they won't rest till they blow up the white house or occupy Jerusalem I'm guessing even if we tuck tail and run it will only serve to give them time to gain strength and recruit more goofs emboldend by their perceived victory only to fight us again and next time we might not be so lucky as to pick the battlefied.

 

[CurrentAffairs]

Yes, and how many American troops lives are you willing to sacrifice?
Hmmm? How many? Because you see, and I really don't take any pleasure in saying this but the fact is that we are not going to win in Iraq! Period!


Never, and you heard it here first! Hell, even the British couldn't rule Iraq for long a long, long, time ago!

Now, the question is... how many American lives are you willing to sacrifice in Iraq till you get the message, 3000?, 5000?, 10,000?

The Iraqi army will never stand up, never!

Now, the question is again... how many American lives are you willing to sacrifice in Iraq till you get the message, 3000?, 5000?, 10,000?

Never again lie to us and say you support our troops, because you don't. You just proved it.

 

[Stinger]

Yes, and how many American troops lives are you willing to sacrifice?
Hmmm? How many? Because you see, and I really don't take any pleasure in saying this but the fact is that we are not going to win in Iraq! Period!


Never, and you heard it here first! Hell, even the British couldn't rule Iraq for long a long, long, time ago!

Now, the question is... how many American lives are you willing to sacrifice in Iraq till you get the message, 3000?, 5000?, 10,000?

The Iraqi army will never stand up, never!

Now, the question is again... how many American lives are you willing to sacrifice in Iraq till you get the message, 3000?, 5000?, 10,000?

Then we can only surmise that you support the immediate withdraw no matter what the consequences.

 

[KidRocks]

Then we can only surmise that you support the immediate withdraw no matter what the consequences.

Not immediate withdrawal, immediate phase withdrawal.

Next, and you Republicans will absolutely love this, we start negotiations with al-Sadr and other insurgent leaders, even al-qaeda leaders, whomever they may be. This must be done. We then include Iran and possibly Syria in the negotiations.

This, my friend, is how we pave the road to peace in the Middle-East!

 

[cherokee]

Never again lie to us and say you support our troops, because you don't. You just proved it.

Hell he's proved that several times before......

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

Not immediate withdrawal, immediate phase withdrawal.

Next, and you Republicans will love absolutely this, we start negotiations with al-Sadr and other insurgent leaders, even al-qaeda leaders, whomever they may be. This must be done. We then include Iran and possibly Syria in the negotiations.

This, my friend, is how we pave the road to peace in the Middle-East!

LMFAO oh ya and what praytelll would be your opening bid in the negotiations?

The negotiations will go like this:

US: We'll withdraw from Iraq if you stop trying to kill us.
AQ: No you are the infidels, and you all must die no matter what you do!

US: O.K. but how about we pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan?
AQ: No you are the infidels and you all must die no matter what you do!

US: OK how about we pull out of Iraq, Afghanistan and you only kill 1,000 of us.
AQ: No you are the infidels and you all must die!

US: How about if we pull out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and the entire Middle East and you just kill 10% of us?
AQ: No you are the infidels and you all must die!

US: How about if we pull out of Iraq, Afghanistan, the Middle East, and the entire world and you only kill 10% of us?
AQ: No you are the infidels and you all must die!

US: O.K. but how about if we pull out of Iraq, Afghanistan, the Middle East, and the entire world and we'll let you kill all of the Republicans?
AQ: No you are all the infidels and you all must die!

US: OK but how about if we pull out of Iraq, Afghanistan, the entire Middle East, the entire world, give you all of the Republicans to kill and the rest of us all convert to Islam?
AQ: Puritianical Wahhabist Islam?

US: No.
AQ: No deal, you are the infidels and you all must die!

US: OK but what if we pull out of Iraq, Afghanistan, the Middle East, the entire world, give you all of the Republicans to kill, and convert to Puritanical Islam under Sharia law?
AQ: Deal.

US and AQ in unison: Allah Akbar!!!

 

[Stinger]

Not immediate withdrawal, immediate phase withdrawal.

Why not immediate? If it is as you and others on the left have said then why not immediate? What's the point of staying a minute longer?

Is it an immoral war?
Is it an illegal war?
Does our being there create more terrorist?
Is it not militarily possible to win, as Murtha says?
Can it only get worse, as Murtha says.

How about an answer to each of those?

Next, and you Republicans will absolutely love this,

How about you Communist?

we start negotiations with al-Sadr and other insurgent leaders, even al-qaeda leaders, whomever they may be. This must be done.

Why on earth, just leave. What is to negoatiate with those guys, what do you want to concede to them?

We then include Iran and possibly Syria in the negotiations.

Oh like they are to be trusted in negotiations. And what exactly do we condede to them in return for what?

This, my friend, is how we pave the road to peace in the Middle-East!

That my firend is folly.