- Joined
- Jun 11, 2009
- Messages
- 19,657
- Reaction score
- 8,454
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
It some kind of wierd hybrid positive rights thing he has come up with.
I honestly would like him to point out an individual liberty that the state can't take away or can't seek to protect.
Nonetheless, his argument is purely philosophical in nature. It doesn't address whether or not same sex marriage is Constitutional.
He simply seeks to diminish marriage to the classification of "privilege" and in so doing, he reduces virtually all our rights to that classification and makes the concept of "rights" virtually meaningless.