Large, Peer-Reviewed Research Study Proves Ivermectin Works Against COVID-19

[VySky]

How many lives were lost by Fauci and his miscreants and malcontents by blocking Ivermectin? A link to the study is here——

The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.

The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.

Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.

Reduced infection and hospitalization rates​

The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[RabidAlpaca]

The irony of someone that spent the last 2 years telling us all the scientific studies showing the vaccine is safe and effective cherry picking a random paper he didn't read and doesn't understand because he thinks it supports his position.

Big fan of scientific publishings now? Read up on this while perusing the medical journals did you? In reality, your zero hedge blog told you what you wanted to hear and you didn't read any further. Go fill yourself up with horse dewormer if you'd like.

 

[Slartibartfast]

I hear it comes in apple flavor

 

[Redress]

How many lives were lost by Fauci and his miscreants and malcontents by blocking Ivermectin? A link to the study is here——

The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.

The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.

Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.

Reduced infection and hospitalization rates​

The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Zero hedge, LoLZ.

Study is getting beaten up pretty badly in the review and comment phase, but has not been disproven. Also, the conclusion from the study was not so definitive as the Zero Hedge(LoLz) headline suggests. I know, a Zero Hedge(LoLz) reader is not the type to actually pay attention to little details like looking at a source...

 

[H B Lowrey]

How many lives were lost by Fauci and his miscreants and malcontents by blocking Ivermectin? A link to the study is here——

The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.

The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.

Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.

Reduced infection and hospitalization rates​

The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Not how science works at all, just stop. You've posted a link, to a media report, of one alleged study. Cool. Now, I'll take that into consideration, dig up the primary peer-reviewed research paper itself, and others on the same topic/query, and see how all the other studies in the specific area compare. K? But hey, thanks for the lead. What did your further research turn up?

 

[Mustachio]

Not how science works at all, just stop. You've posted a link, to a media report, of one alleged study. Cool. Now, I'll take that into consideration, dig up the primary peer-reviewed research paper itself, and others on the same topic/query, and see how all the other studies in the specific area compare. K? But hey, thanks for the lead. What did your further research turn up?

Vysky was kind enough to enlighten me about zerohedge, this site that has pay-per-click articles so they use spam accounts to flood social media and - hmmmm - maybe even forums - with their top articles. It was so pervasive that google BANNED zerohedge. Google. And twitter. It's founder is a Ukranian millionaire / billionaire who has been targeting right wingers in America for questionable reasons. Some say it's to influence elections and others say zerohedge is just so shameless they'll do anything including having fake accounts spam their articles everywhere. Is it all about the benjamins? Either way, definitely check out this article instead

The report by the Center for Countering Digital Hate that was given to NBC cited ten websites including Brietbart and The Gateway Pundit, two other well-known conservative websites.

The ten websites flagged were American Greatness, Moonbattery, American Thinker, Big League Politics, Zero Hedge, WND, The Washington Standard, Gateway Pundit, Breitbart and The Federalist. Google refused to say whether any of the other sites had been demonetized.

Wait........ zero hedge, wnd, WS, gateway pundit, breitbart..... did I mistakenly make a list of the websites vkysky links to every day and noon and midnight? No, no, that's in the article. Huh. Good read either way

I should add the above article is a total right wing piece and pretty trashy. But it demonstrates why these websites would perhaps try to get creative about finding ways to share content after the google ban.

 

[Colin Norris]

How many lives were lost by Fauci and his miscreants and malcontents by blocking Ivermectin? A link to the study is here——

The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.

The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.

Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.

Reduced infection and hospitalization rates​

The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Let's get a couple of things straight and cut your lies.
At the time ivermectin was not registered in America for that reason.
Fauci did not kill people but in fact did his job quite diligently.
What your really saying is you hate how he stood up to the idiot trump. Its breathtakingly ignorant to suggest he is responsible for anything.

 

[cpwill]

The irony of someone that spent the last 2 years telling us all the scientific studies showing the vaccine is safe and effective cherry picking a random paper he didn't read and doesn't understand because he thinks it supports his position.

Big fan of scientific publishings now? Read up on this while perusing the medical journals did you? In reality, your zero hedge blog told you what you wanted to hear and you didn't read any further. Go fill yourself up with horse dewormer if you'd like.

Just to point out, ivermectine isn't horse dewormer- it's used in horse dewormer. Criticizing it as such (which, full disclosure: I did before learning more) is like criticizing people for consuming dihydrogen monoxide for health, because it's found in all liquors and cancer cells.

 

[VySky]

Let's get a couple of things straight and cut your lies.
At the time ivermectin was not registered in America for that reason.
Fauci did not kill people but in fact did his job quite diligently.
What your really saying is you hate how he stood up to the idiot trump. Its breathtakingly ignorant to suggest he is responsible for anything.

Wasn’t registered.?

Oh the technicalities.

 

[Desert Storm]

Zero hedge, LoLZ

Dont mean to nitpick, but the study was published on Nucleus which is actually a fairly prestigious journal publishing site

Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for COVID-19: A Citywide, Prospective, Observational Study of 223,128 Subjects Using Propensity Score Matching

Background: Ivermectin has demonstrated different mechanisms of action that potentially protect from both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and COVID-19-related comorbidities. Based on the studies suggesting efficacy in prophylaxis combined with the known safety profile of...

www.cureus.com

And this was their final conclusion

Conclusions​

In a citywide ivermectin program with prophylactic, optional ivermectin use for COVID-19, ivermectin was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death rates from COVID-19.

 

[Desert Storm]

Let's get a couple of things straight and cut your lies.
At the time ivermectin was not registered in America for that reason

It doesnt need to be registered, it can be (and often was) prescribed by a doctor off-label to Covid patients

 

[bluesmoke]

The publisher was Cureus, not Nucleus. Cureus uses crowdsourcing peer review for its published studies. Anybody can review a study but reviews by "experts" are given a higher score:

Cureus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I wouldn't call this a peer reviewed study until I heard more about who exactly these peers were. I'm not sure many bona fide experts would be responsive to someone requiring they conduct their peer review of a given study in only a few days. "When I say jump,..."

 

[snakestretcher]

How many lives were lost by Fauci and his miscreants and malcontents by blocking Ivermectin? A link to the study is here——

The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.

The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.

Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.

Reduced infection and hospitalization rates​

The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

How many lives were lost by Fauci and his miscreants and malcontents by blocking Ivermectin? A link to the study is here——

The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.

The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.

Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.

Reduced infection and hospitalization rates​

The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

*Cough...*

Why HCQ and Ivermectin were removed from India’s Covid-19 treatment protocol

Ivermectin and HCQ were dropped from the clinical guidance after studies found that these drugs have little to no effect on Covid-related mortality or clinical recovery of the patient.

www.indiatoday.in

And by the way, this 'study' of yours was not peer-reviewed! Quote: "For transparency reasons two datasets...will be made public upon peer-reviewed publication. Where was this study published and peer-reviewed? Furthermore why is Daniel Ivandjiiski so frightened of using his own name that he resorts to a pseudonym, 'Tyler Durden'? (Who calls a kid 'Tyler' anyway? What a dumb use for a surname. 'Taylor' is bad enough; is this an American 'thing'?).

 

[bomberfox]

The irony of someone that spent the last 2 years telling us all the scientific studies showing the vaccine is safe and effective cherry picking a random paper he didn't read and doesn't understand because he thinks it supports his position.

Big fan of scientific publishings now? Read up on this while perusing the medical journals did you? In reality, your zero hedge blog told you what you wanted to hear and you didn't read any further. Go fill yourself up with horse dewormer if you'd like.

Hes a zero hedge promoter.

 

[BlueTex]

How many lives were lost by Fauci and his miscreants and malcontents by blocking Ivermectin? A link to the study is here——

The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.

The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.

Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.

Reduced infection and hospitalization rates​

The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Ivermectin is available across the world. Why have we seen no other countries that bought into this bullshit successfully using ivermectin to treat COVID? Is Fauci all powerful and is preventing other countries from showing their great results?

 

[bongsaway]

How many lives were lost by Fauci and his miscreants and malcontents by blocking Ivermectin? A link to the study is here——

The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.

The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.

Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.

Reduced infection and hospitalization rates​

The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Is your real life name Whinny the Poo?

 

[Gateman_Wen]

How many lives were lost by Fauci and his miscreants and malcontents by blocking Ivermectin? A link to the study is here——

The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.

The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.

Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.

Reduced infection and hospitalization rates​

The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Yeah......................... no, it doesn't.

 

[year2late]

How many lives were lost by Fauci and his miscreants and malcontents by blocking Ivermectin? A link to the study is here——

The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.

The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.

Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.

Reduced infection and hospitalization rates​

The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Fact Check: Hospitalizations, Mortality Were NOT Cut In Half After Brazilian City Offered Ivermectin; City Officials Rebut Study | Lead Stories

Did a Brazilian city cut hospitalizations and mortality in half after offering everyone ivermectin before COVID-19 vaccinations were available? No,...

leadstories.com

 

[PeacefulWarrior]

How many lives were lost by Fauci and his miscreants and malcontents by blocking Ivermectin? A link to the study is here——

The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.

The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.

Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.

Reduced infection and hospitalization rates​

The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

"Zerohedge"...is that a branch of the American Medical Association?

 

[year2late]

How many lives were lost by Fauci and his miscreants and malcontents by blocking Ivermectin? A link to the study is here——

The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.

The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.

Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.

Reduced infection and hospitalization rates​

The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Brazil's tragic ivermectin frenzy is a warning to the US, experts say

One ICU doctor said the US should take note: "We Brazilians had to learn in the hardest way that ivermectin didn't work."

www.businessinsider.com

 

[CaughtInThe]

Let's get a couple of things straight and cut your lies.
At the time ivermectin was not registered in America for that reason.
Fauci did not kill people but in fact did his job quite diligently.
What your really saying is you hate how he stood up to the idiot trump. Its breathtakingly ignorant to suggest he is responsible for anything.

All of the Fauci hate is simply because he disagreed with their political girlfriend and they got their panties in a wad.

I will say they also needed a scapegoat for their political girlfriend's failures so they picked him.

 

[tres borrachos]

Dont mean to nitpick, but the study was published on Nucleus which is actually a fairly prestigious journal publishing site

Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for COVID-19: A Citywide, Prospective, Observational Study of 223,128 Subjects Using Propensity Score Matching

Background: Ivermectin has demonstrated different mechanisms of action that potentially protect from both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and COVID-19-related comorbidities. Based on the studies suggesting efficacy in prophylaxis combined with the known safety profile of...

www.cureus.com

And this was their final conclusion

That isn't Nucleus. It's Cureus.

 

[tres borrachos]

The publisher was Cureus, not Nucleus. Cureus uses crowdsourcing peer review for its published studies. Anybody can review a study but reviews by "experts" are given a higher score:

Cureus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I wouldn't call this a peer reviewed study until I heard more about who exactly these peers were. I'm not sure many bona fide experts would be responsive to someone requiring they conduct their peer review of a given study in only a few days. "When I say jump,..."

Apologies. I didn't see this before I also pointed out to that poster that this is from Cureus, not Nucleus like he claimed.

 

[Desert Storm]

That isn't Nucleus. It's Cureus

Already pointed out: https://debatepolitics.com/threads/...works-against-covid-19.470965/post-1075314625

I had the word 'nuclear' on my mind when I typed it, and this site doesnt allow edit after a certain timeframe

 

[tres borrachos]

Already pointed out: https://debatepolitics.com/threads/...works-against-covid-19.470965/post-1075314625

I had the word 'nuclear' on my mind when I typed it, and this site doesnt allow edit after a certain timeframe

I already acknowledged to the poster who pointed it out that I didn't see his post first.