- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 68,759
- Reaction score
- 52,815
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Sure let's discuss Bobulinski. Bobulinski never did business with Hunter Biden.. In texts and emails he released to the WSJ he acknowledges planning to do business with him but the entire deal fell through in the summer of 2017. So Bobulinkski is claiming that Joe Biden somehow profited from a partnership with Hunter Biden that never existed. He claims as 'proof' that Joe Biden had an ownership stake in Sinohawk Holdings, an email in which Joe Biden is referred to as the "Big Guy". But how does that make any sense seeing as though him being the CEO of the company you would think if Joe Biden had an ownership stake in the company it would be easy for him to prove. So I think it's safe to assume that Joe didn't and even if he did have an ownership stake it would be worth nothing. Why? Cause the deal fell apart. No business was ever done. 10% of zero is still zero. So what are we left with? The notion that Joe Biden said that he didn't discuss business with his son in way that is not explained by Bobulinski. Not to mention this is all in the summer of 2017 when Joe Biden was no longer Vice President. So there wouldn't be anything illicit or unethical about talking business with him. But there isn't any evidence that he did and Bobulinski doesn't claim it. The fact that this ended up in the opinion section of both the Post and the WSJ and not in actual news stories underscores the weakness of the allegations made by Bobulinski.
Sounds like Bobulinski got discombobulated.