Nothing he says "ties" the emails from Hunter Biden's laptop to his own case. Kyle Rittenhouse just commented on the emails. So what?
Yes, he was cleared on all counts, including a gun possession charge, because the jury found that he had reasonably defended himself against people who attacked him.
This article frames this as "embraced by the right" - as if acting in self-defense is somehow a right wing thing to do. He was found not guilty, he wasn't "embraced." And, the article suggests he "joined the chorus of those claiming..." the laptop has been shown to be a legitimate concern. Oh, yeah - like - the Washington Post, New York Times, and other media outlets who previously covered the story up are not reporting ont he story, because it is a legitimate concern? That "chorus?" LOL.
So Rittenhouse said "Biden can turn a blind eye to misconduct of his own son, but defames me for defending myself?" I mean - Biden did defame Rittenhouse. He depicted an image of Rittenhouse when he referred to Trump not condemning "white supremacists." And, he said flat out that Rittenhouse was a "militia member" and asked "have you ever heard this president condemn white supremacists..." in that same comment, referring to Rittenhouse. That's not "tying" the laptop to his own case, that's comparing what Joe Biden says about his crackhead crook son, compared to what he said about a presumed innocent and later found not guilty, person.
This is a "Republicans Pounce!" article. The article says "....organizations such as
The New York Times and
The Washington Post have authenticated some of the original claims regarding Hunter Biden's laptop, which were first published by the
New York Post just weeks before the 2020 election." So, it's not just a "chorus" of "right wingers" who are interested in the laptop. But, this article frames it as "A number of Republican figures have jumped on how news..." See, cuz, like, it's bad to "jump on" or "pounce" on something that comes out negative about a democrat - see, then it's not the negative information that is the issue, it's the "pouncing" that's the issue. LOL.
The framing is beautiful in this piece -- the article describes how "Hunter Biden arranged for then Vice President Joe Biden to meet with an executive from Ukrainian energy firm Burisma, where Hunter Biden was a board member, in April 2015." -- But, it's couched in terms of "the original reporting from the NYPost claimed..." that. No no. The original reporting of the NY Post REPORTED that the emails REVEALED that Hunter arranged that meeting. But the article wants to downplay it, so it becomes just some claim made by the NYPost in the original reporting, lol.
Then it gets better - Since the emails "suggest there was a conflict of interest where Joe Biden was involved or even profited from his son's foreign business dealings with Ukraine and China during his first stint in the White House," you'd think the reporting would be about that conflict of interest, right? Oh, no. Not this reporter - he says "the claims were used by the GOP" to suggest that. LOL. So, it's not about the conflict of interest anymore, it's about the "Republicans Pounce!" - they're taking advantage of this! That's dirty pool!
Way down deep in the article, the writers says "After originally dismissing the reports as potential misinformation and
casting doubt on its authenticity,
The Washington Post found that thousands of emails did come from the computer that Hunter Biden allegedly dropped off at a repair shop in Wilmington, Delaware in April 2019 and never picked up." - so where did this author get off leading in the article with "far right..." and "republicans jumping...." ?
