• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kenosha Shooter Killed Convicted Pedophile, Epsteinist

Conviction date 2002. Joseph was 18 years old. City-data.com states offense was 'sexual conduct with minor.' If it were pedophilia it would refer to assault of child like others on the database. What was the victim? 16? 17? Would you call an 18 year old in a relationship with a 16 year old a 'pedophile?'

Yes, if anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt, it’s someone on the sex offender registry.
 
Lol, since when have you cared about all the facts before making a judgment? Something bad said about Trump, you believe it. Something bad said about cops and you believe it. Something bad about a protester, you just know it’s fake.

You know taac was lying, don't you.
 
There are certain restrictions depending on age and type of weapon, but it is legal for a 17 year old to own a rifle.
Um, no.

He can't have a firearm in his possession without adult supervision or permission at 17.
 
Yes, if anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt, it’s someone on the sex offender registry.
Yeah, because no 18 year old ever slept with a 16 year old. :roll:

Some jackass kid that illegally stole and traveled across state lines with a firearm, then brandished a weapon really deserves the benefit of the doubt, right?
 
You know taac was lying, don't you.

You're one of those guys who goes around saying 'but Epstein wasn't a pedophile! His victims were a full 2 years past puberty!'
Geoist tried to make the same case.
And you both defend Antifa.

This thread couldn't have gone any better for proving my OP, lol.
 
So is this a thread promoting the murder of those who had underage gf's at age 18?

Yet they love them some Ted Nugent, a paragon of GOP virtues.
 
Kyle Rittenhouse shot two men to death as they were savagely attacking him with skateboards, fists, and kicks. We're learning more about the men who were killed (we have our ways), yet the media is remaining silent. One of the dead Antifa activists is Joseph 'Jojo' Rosenbaum, a convicted sex offender who was legally required to register for life.

Joseph Rosenbaum

6006320200710.jpg


Joseph D Rosenbaum - Sex Offender in Kenosha, WI 53142 - WI60063

Why are Antifa members so often exposed as sex offenders? Is there something about the sex offender's way of thinking that would be drawn to supporting anarchy, communism, and radical change in America?

Kid should be given a medal! ****ing awesome
 
Not interested in defending or excusing Rosenbaum's crimes (not that they matter in Kyle's case). But you are the one who said pedophilia. Do you have any evidence to this pedophilia outside of his conviction of sexual conduct with a minor when that minor could very well have been 16 or 17?
If the minor were 15 or older, he could have had his name removed from the registry. The fact that he's on the list for life indicates he was considered a Level 3 sex offender at the time - the greatest risk to society. It appears highly unlikely that this refers to simple, consensual sex with an underage girlfriend.
 
Yeah, because no 18 year old ever slept with a 16 year old. :roll:

Some jackass kid that illegally stole and traveled across state lines with a firearm, then brandished a weapon really deserves the benefit of the doubt, right?
You’re speaking to one of the broadest brushers on the board. I’m still waiting to be told of a black cop shooting a white guy in the BACK SEVEN times with multiple officers standing by. Too many of these have occurred for this not to be a coordinated pattern.
 
Yeah, because no 18 year old ever slept with a 16 year old. :roll:

Before you roll your eyes as if you’re making a really solid argument, most jurisdictions have “Romeo and Juliet” laws provide for that very defense.

Some jackass kid that illegally stole and traveled across state lines with a firearm, then brandished a weapon really deserves the benefit of the doubt, right?

It’s just funny to see people sticking up for sex offenders. It’s also funny to see lefties become all pro lock kid up and throw away the key forever because **** notions of rehabilitation.
 
Um, no.

He can't have a firearm in his possession without adult supervision or permission at 17.
Minors age 16 or 17 can carry a rifle or shotgun without supervision.
 
You're still guessing that his victim was a 16/17 year old girl, in order to clean up his image. He had 5 charges of 'throwing substances at prison guards'. Wow, that's just really something Geoist.. Why don't we assume that the substance in question was confetti, in order to further delude ourselves and look silly?

You started the thead saying he was a pedophile. The conviction was for sexual conduct with a minor. You do understand minors include anyone under 18 in AZ, right? Do you have proof of the victim's age?
 
Full disclosure is a pain when you've chosen to align with Antifa.

Full disclosure does not include making assumptions due to lack of information.
 
Yes, if anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt, it’s someone on the sex offender registry.

Carry on peddling unfounded claims.
 
Yet they love them some Ted Nugent, a paragon of GOP virtues.

And Roy Moore. Who was it on DP who said they'd rather have a pedo Republican over a Democrat as their senator?
 
Don't know about Illinois, but you're wrong about Wisconsin.
Not how I'm reading it.
948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
948.60(2)(a)(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
 
Don't know about Illinois, but you're wrong about Wisconsin.

You’re correct about not knowing about Illinois. Prove to us you know about Wisconsin.
 
What “unfounded claims” did it “peddle” there?

TAAC's claims of pedophilia. We do not know the details of the conviction of sexual conduct with a minor.
 
Back
Top Bottom