- Joined
- Sep 30, 2013
- Messages
- 61,503
- Reaction score
- 64,634
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Your posts suggest otherwise.
They sure do....
Your posts suggest otherwise.
Conviction date 2002. Joseph was 18 years old. City-data.com states offense was 'sexual conduct with minor.' If it were pedophilia it would refer to assault of child like others on the database. What was the victim? 16? 17? Would you call an 18 year old in a relationship with a 16 year old a 'pedophile?'
Lol, since when have you cared about all the facts before making a judgment? Something bad said about Trump, you believe it. Something bad said about cops and you believe it. Something bad about a protester, you just know it’s fake.
Um, no.There are certain restrictions depending on age and type of weapon, but it is legal for a 17 year old to own a rifle.
Yeah, because no 18 year old ever slept with a 16 year old. :roll:Yes, if anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt, it’s someone on the sex offender registry.
You know taac was lying, don't you.
So is this a thread promoting the murder of those who had underage gf's at age 18?
Kyle Rittenhouse shot two men to death as they were savagely attacking him with skateboards, fists, and kicks. We're learning more about the men who were killed (we have our ways), yet the media is remaining silent. One of the dead Antifa activists is Joseph 'Jojo' Rosenbaum, a convicted sex offender who was legally required to register for life.
Joseph Rosenbaum
Joseph D Rosenbaum - Sex Offender in Kenosha, WI 53142 - WI60063
Why are Antifa members so often exposed as sex offenders? Is there something about the sex offender's way of thinking that would be drawn to supporting anarchy, communism, and radical change in America?
If the minor were 15 or older, he could have had his name removed from the registry. The fact that he's on the list for life indicates he was considered a Level 3 sex offender at the time - the greatest risk to society. It appears highly unlikely that this refers to simple, consensual sex with an underage girlfriend.Not interested in defending or excusing Rosenbaum's crimes (not that they matter in Kyle's case). But you are the one who said pedophilia. Do you have any evidence to this pedophilia outside of his conviction of sexual conduct with a minor when that minor could very well have been 16 or 17?
You’re speaking to one of the broadest brushers on the board. I’m still waiting to be told of a black cop shooting a white guy in the BACK SEVEN times with multiple officers standing by. Too many of these have occurred for this not to be a coordinated pattern.Yeah, because no 18 year old ever slept with a 16 year old. :roll:
Some jackass kid that illegally stole and traveled across state lines with a firearm, then brandished a weapon really deserves the benefit of the doubt, right?
Yeah, because no 18 year old ever slept with a 16 year old. :roll:
Some jackass kid that illegally stole and traveled across state lines with a firearm, then brandished a weapon really deserves the benefit of the doubt, right?
And some of the most dated hard rock out there.Yet they love them some Ted Nugent, a paragon of GOP virtues.
Minors age 16 or 17 can carry a rifle or shotgun without supervision.Um, no.
He can't have a firearm in his possession without adult supervision or permission at 17.
Kid should be given a medal! ****ing awesome
And some of the most dated hard rock out there.
You're still guessing that his victim was a 16/17 year old girl, in order to clean up his image. He had 5 charges of 'throwing substances at prison guards'. Wow, that's just really something Geoist.. Why don't we assume that the substance in question was confetti, in order to further delude ourselves and look silly?
Full disclosure is a pain when you've chosen to align with Antifa.
Yes, if anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt, it’s someone on the sex offender registry.
Not in Wisconsin or Illinois.Minors age 16 or 17 can carry a rifle or shotgun without supervision.
Yet they love them some Ted Nugent, a paragon of GOP virtues.
Don't know about Illinois, but you're wrong about Wisconsin.Not in Wisconsin or Illinois.
Carry on peddling unfounded claims.
Not how I'm reading it.Don't know about Illinois, but you're wrong about Wisconsin.
948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1) In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2)
948.60(2)(a)(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
Don't know about Illinois, but you're wrong about Wisconsin.
What “unfounded claims” did it “peddle” there?