• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Karl Marx for Dummies

robin

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2005
Messages
1,045
Reaction score
0
Location
UK
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Food for thought !
 
Last edited:
[Moderator mode]

Thread moved to "On the lighter side"...Nothing debatable...

[/Moderator mode]
 
cnredd said:
[Moderator mode]

Thread moved to "On the lighter side"...Nothing debatable...

[/Moderator mode]
Meddling mods :mad:
I absolutely do not agree. Just becuase a thread topic starts on the lighter side doesn't mean there is nothing to debate.
In this case especially, there are very serious consequences for the USA economy to be debated so I've reposted it in the economy forum.
 
Last edited:
robin said:
Meddling mods :mad:
I absolutely do not agree. Just becuase a thread topic starts on the lighter side doesn't mean there is nothing to debate.
In this case especially, there are very serious consequences for the USA economy to be debated so I've reposted it in the economy forum.
I regret that you don't agree; however, the Mod Team has been charged w/ making these determinations. The team does this to the best of their humble abilities. Please respect their judgments.

Of course there's plenty to debate. You didn't phrase your OP in th eform of a debate though.
I've closed the thread in Economics.
 
Simon W. Moon said:
I regret that you don't agree; however, the Mod Team has been charged w/ making these determinations. The team does this to the best of their humble abilities. Please respect their judgments.

Of course there's plenty to debate. You didn't phrase your OP in th eform of a debate though.
I've closed the thread in Economics.
That image with the words is perfectly capable of being the start point for a debate.
This is gratuitous moderation.... Busybodies.
Wouldn't make a hapeth of difference if there were no mods.
Forumists maketh forums... not moderators.
You've just proved that by stifling what could have been an economics debate.
 
Last edited:
robin said:
That image with the words is perfectly capable of being the start point for a debate.
This is gratuitous moderation.... Busybodies.
Wouldn't make a hapeth of difference if there were no mods.
Forumists maketh forums... not moderators.
You've just proved that by stifling what could have been an economics debate.
You opinion has been noted.
 
Back
Top Bottom