- Joined
- Oct 30, 2011
- Messages
- 19,078
- Reaction score
- 6,751
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
She is not far left.
???????
She is not far left.
???????
Pick a policy that is "Far Left" of hers. Then google up a poll on it. It will result in her policy being closer to the center than the GOP more often than not.
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) has joined fellow Democrats in calling for Congress to “critically re-examine” U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and perhaps even “start from scratch” in overhauling the agency.
“I think there's no question that we've got to critically reexamine ICE and its role and the way that it is being administered and the work it is doing,” Harris told MSNBC’s Kasie Hunt.
“And we need to probably think about starting from scratch. There is a lot that is wrong with the way that it is conducting itself and we need to deal with that.”
Yes. Abolishing ICE is not mainstream. Then again, your clip doesn't say she was for abolishing ICE. Got any others?
And we need to probably think about starting from scratch.
She is calling for the abolishing of ICE and coming up with something else. Dance around it all you want.
ICE=Goon Squad
Well you just run on abolishing ICE and see how that works out for you. Most of your Democrat representatives, like Harris, are in your corner already.
She is calling for the abolishing of ICE and coming up with something else. Dance around it all you want.
That is not abolishing. That is rebuilding. Abolishing would be to kill it and not replace it.
Abolishing ICE and replacing it with the Left's Code Pink version is essentially abolishing it.
She was a prosecutor before becoming CA Senator, she's nobody to be messed with. Trump has met his match.
Or you just blow a lot of snot because you don't like the reality.
Do you mean a repub primarying Trump? If so.... it will be KASICH. He's going to primary the Prez if he isn't booted. You watch. It will be Kasich, he's itching for the presidency. I say that after watching him on Bill Maher the other day.
Democrats having a big field is good. We need people who won't see 80 for at least 10 years. Enough of the gerontocracy.
Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
The only D that gets any interest from me thus far is Amy Klobuchar (if she gets in). Don't think she stands a chance though.
She should do well. She has that smug, air of contempt aura liberals are so fond of.
I'm from California. I voted for her; I now regret that.
She promised she would be a Senator who, like Barbara Boxer, would work for Californians for the long haul. Instead, she was putting together presidential exploratory committees before she'd found the nearest restroom to her senate office.
So Californians have had a Senator for two years whose focus was on herself and her blind ambitions, not the concerns of the voters who put her there; that focus will obviously continue for the next two years, so Californians will, one way or the other, have been deprived a real representation by Senator Harris throughout her entire "term". The only way she'll ever get a vote from me again is if hers in the only name on the ballot running against Trump in Nov. 2020.
If she doesn't win the Democratic nomination, good luck on having a second bite of that Senatorial apple running for reelection in 2022. Fool us once, shame on you; fool us twice, shame on us.
Amy Klobuchar is also my top choice at the moment; if she got it and took Cory Booker as veep, I think that ticket would win in a landslide.
Oh, you mean like Condoleezza Rice?
ICE=Goon Squad
have a nice day this is the same as the last no response.