• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Kamala Harris Crystallizes Trump’s View of Women

No, you don't.

And this is where some liberals (in general, not directed at you) border on slander.

Most black Americans, as far as I know, were born in the United States. The issue of where Barack Obama was born had nothing to do with his race.

There was never an 'issue'. Barack Obama's mother was an American citizen. He could have been born on the moon and he'd still qualify. It was not a legit question to begin with.

And neither is there any 'issue' about Kamala Harris. She was born in California - both her parents could have been Martians and she'd still qualify.

He only questions the people of color. We all know why.
 
He only questions the people of color. We all know why.

Were there any questions as to whether Clinton or Bush were born in the U. S.? Or Biden?

He's running against Harris, virtually, of course he's going to bring this all up. And he was essentially running against the Obama platform.

I can guarantee you he won't question whether Ben Carson was born in the U. S. ;)
 
Lol what the hell is this about???

I'm not going to look it up.

Or ask why you brought it up.

Some people say he is into pee sex. Picture it. Donald watching prostitutes peeing on each other:

Here's What the Mueller Report Says About the Pee Tape - Rolling Stone

Hey, it’s cool! Some people are kinky. Trump likes sex with porn stars and pee-watching hookers. Clinton liked blowjobs in the oval office. You think Trump has women peeing on the Resolute Desk? Maybe. Maybe just in the residence? Picture it. Trump masturbating in the Oval office while hookers pee. It’s ok. Maybe not. Maybe a lot of peeing. Who knows?
 
Some people say he is into pee sex. Picture it. Donald watching prostitutes peeing on each other:

Here's What the Mueller Report Says About the Pee Tape - Rolling Stone

Hey, it’s cool! Some people are kinky. Trump likes sex with porn stars and pee-watching hookers. Clinton liked blowjobs in the oval office. You think Trump has women peeing on the Resolute Desk? Maybe. Maybe just in the residence? Picture it. Trump masturbating in the Oval office while hookers pee. It’s ok. Maybe not. Maybe a lot of peeing. Who knows?

Lol no boundaries, man...

Let these people have their private lives lol
 
Were there any questions as to whether Clinton or Bush were born in the U. S.? Or Biden?

He's running against Harris, virtually, of course he's going to bring this all up. And he was essentially running against the Obama platform.

I can guarantee you he won't question whether Ben Carson was born in the U. S. ;)

Where they were born was a direct attack on their race, which he reserves for opponents. It shouldn't even come up.
 
Where they were born was a direct attack on their race, which he reserves for opponents. It shouldn't even come up.

You keep confusing concerns about immigration with racism.

Is there some kind of running narrative that many black Americans weren't born in the U. S.? I've never heard that. It doesn't exist. It's not an issue.

He questioned Warren's heritage as well lol. She is white.
 
You keep confusing concerns about immigration with racism.

Is there some kind of running narrative that many black Americans weren't born in the U. S.? I've never heard that. It doesn't exist. It's not an issue.

He questioned Warren's heritage as well lol. She is white.

This isn't really helping to defend Trump is it? Reminding us of his attacks on the citizenship of two people who should never have been called into question and the ethnicity of a woman he nicknamed 'Pocahontas'.

Oh, that's not racist at all is it?

So the racial, ethnic and gender based attacks continue.

President Donald Trump refused on Saturday to shut down false claims that California Sen. Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic vice-presidential nominee, is ineligible to run in the 2020 election. While the president said he did not plan on "pursuing" the false claims, which were prompted by an op-ed published by Newsweek questioning Harris' eligibility, he fell short of rejecting them outright, despite being pressed to do so by a reporter.

"I have nothing to do with that. I read something about it." Trump said after he was asked to state that Harris is eligible to run in the 2020 election during a press briefing at his golf resort in Bedminster, New Jersey. "I know nothing about it, but it's not something that bothers me."Pressed further, Trump said: "I just don't know about it, but it's not something that we will be pursuing."

He did not read it anywhere - he overheard it 'somewhere' or made it up himself on the spot. He doesn't read anyway, he can't be bothered. And while he won't 'pursue' it because it's patently false, he'll mention it again and again at his rallies, just watch.
 
Last edited:
BB17SA8R.img

Look at how angry and vindictive she looks...
 
I will preface this by saying I am not a Kamala Harris fan, but from the perspective of Trump (and his supporters and enablers) what she does do is bring out Trump's prejudices and misogynistic attitudes right out into the open.

The Twitter moments we will see between now and election day should be nothing but popcorn ready, damn near meltdowns from President CheetoVonTweeto.

We all saw this coming. If the VP nominee had been Gabbard, she would have been "a beautiful woman who looks very nice in dresses". If it had been Warren, she would have been "a nasty woman from the radical, loony left". If it had been Sanders, he would have been "a crazy socialist who happens to be Jewish". If it had been Buttigieg, he would have been "a soft man who hey, what he does in his bedroom is between him and his wife, I mean, husband". And so Harris is a non-American skank.

Trump is a piece of **** who would get thrown out of a Denny's for grabbing his server's ass and calling the cook who made his three Grand Slams a spic.
 
View attachment 67291513

Biden won't lose voters over his pick. Kamala, like Joe, was not everyone's first choice. Neither can be accused of being 'messiah' or 'anointed one' (ironically by people who follow Trump like they're in a cult). But they'll do and she'll do. They're capable adults with the right political experience.

The fact that Trump's rage and his supporters' ire is directed at both Harris' gender and her ethnicity is wholly predictable. It plays to the base - nobody else buys it. Just birtherism 2.0

Dammmm. The hats though. Trumpists are literally wearing their stupidity for others to see.
 
Let's just face reality - when trump talks about "suburban women" he's talking about white women. It's a continuation of his disgusting race war. He's trying to frighten white people into thinking people of color are going to destroy their neighborhood and nation.

There isn't any question about that. He put the term in quotation marks and then followed it up with "low income housing" and "invade". He's a racist, race baiting racist.

“The ‘suburban housewife' will be voting for me. They want safety & are thrilled that I ended the long running program where low income housing would invade their neighborhood,” he tweeted.
 
You TDS'ers put so much supposing out there it's laughable. You are so sure of winning, it's pathological. What you have is an extreme case of conformation bias making it impossible to accept that most people want to know what you plan to accomplish during your presidency.

So far, it's do a 25th Amendment on Biden (mentally unfit) install Harris, then impeach Trump again. The rest is just groping around to keep the progressives happy. This is the sum total of the Harris/Biden team's plan. She will go after Trump like a prosecutor, but in an election people what to know "What about me?". Beyond that, the ticket is empty of actual substance.

The fact is, during the convention there will be some bland pronouncements of what the DNC says lies ahead, but in reality the only platform is "Beating Trump". That is a worthy goal for a TDS'er, but I seriously doubt that is enough to get across the finish line using the way too obvious ploy of swapping out a hard left progressive using Biden as a Trojan Horse.

I shall leave you to your fantasies now... I shall go out and enjoy the 111 degree heat in my 110 degree pool! LOL

Or you could read Biden's actual platform, which includes 46 detailed categories.

Joe's Vision – Joe Biden for President: Official Campaign Website
 
Kamala Harris Crystallizes Trump’s View of Women

BB17SA8R.img



Donald Trump has a fossilized brain from the segregationist era when Gov. George Wallace openly spewed his racism in 1960's Talabama.

His view of women is from a similar era. Docile suburban women who stayed in the kitchen and kept quiet when the men were talking.

For Trump there are two kinds of women. There are those he wants to have sex with (including possibly Ivanka :shock:) and everyone else.
 
Last edited:
This isn't really helping to defend Trump is it? Reminding us of his attacks on the citizenship of two people who should never have been called into question and the ethnicity of a woman he nicknamed 'Pocahontas'.

Oh, that's not racist at all is it?

So the racial, ethnic and gender based attacks continue.



He did not read it anywhere - he overheard it 'somewhere' or made it up himself on the spot. He doesn't read anyway, he can't be bothered. And while he won't 'pursue' it because it's patently false, he'll mention it again and again at his rallies, just watch.

Uptower, you can't use "Racism" as a catch-call for any criticism you have of Trump's personality.

He is not racist.

None of these examples have anything to do with anyone's race.

I have never heard of anyone, even white nationalists, claim that black Americans weren't born here. It's not part of any racist narrative, on anyone's part.

Trump is running against Harris, essentially, since Joe will be turning 80 soon. He heard some sort of rumor, apparently, it wasn't true. But it has nothing to do with Harris's race. He investigated Warren's heritage as well, she is white.

Our candidate is not perfect. Neither is yours. The responsible thing to do is vote on policy.

 
He heard some sort of rumor, apparently, it wasn't true. But it has nothing to do with Harris's race. He investigated Warren's heritage as well, she is white.

Even though he says it indirectly it's still transparent. He has no business 'investigating' anyone's citizenship or heritage; not least his political rivals who happen to be people of color. It's no coincidence.

This latest attack on harris is just that - a political attack, racially motivated, and in no way an 'honest' question or line of inquiry.
 
Even though he says it indirectly it's still transparent. He has no business 'investigating' anyone's citizenship or heritage; not least his political rivals who happen to be people of color. It's no coincidence.

Is Elizabeth Warren a person of color?

Of course he has business investigating the qualifications of his rivals. It's called vetting.

Which is what Biden should be doing, rather than hiding in his basement.
 
Last edited:
This latest attack on harris is just that - a political attack, racially motivated, and in no way an 'honest' question or line of inquiry.

It almost sounds like Democrats are using Harris for her race and gender. I can't think of anything more disrespectful to a politician then using their race and gender as a political wedge, if I were Harris I would be pissed.

Is this the real reason Biden chose a woman of color?

Because it sounds to me like this is the plan. No matter what Trump says to criticize her, he is either racist or misogynistic.

Harris is a politician like everyone else, and she is a person with ideas. Not some kind of a political pawn.
 
Is this the real reason Biden chose a woman of color?

Because it sounds to me like this is the plan. No matter what Trump says to criticize her, he is either racist or misogynistic.

Harris is a politician like everyone else, and she is a person with ideas. Not some kind of a political pawn.

If Biden chose Harris to goad Trump into something racist, that kinda says more about Trump doesn't it?

Biden chose Harris because he needed the experience and the votes and yes, her race will be a factor in bringing those. that trump then uses it to question her citizenship is not 'vetting,' it's race-baiting and we saw it with Obama ten years ago.
 
If Biden chose Harris to goad Trump into something racist, that kinda says more about Trump doesn't it?

No, with all due respect, it says more about liberals. Using Harris for her race, rather than her mind.
 
Back
Top Bottom