- Joined
- Feb 24, 2013
- Messages
- 34,708
- Reaction score
- 19,184
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
There is so much fail in your post I don't even know where to begin. So let me break it down for you.
Fail #1 - What "moral political fiber"
Try reading...
Fail #2 - What does Kavanaugh have to do with my posts? If you can find a single post from me saying that Kavanaugh has to go because of allegations of sexual assault (which is what your fellow Trump devotee apdst said needs to happen with Fairfax), then link it. Hint - you won't find one because I never said it.
I was comparing your conditional moral outrage to the Washington Post's. You have gone full nuclear on Trump for what you think he might have done, and rush to the defense of Fairfax for the same thing. Likewise, the Washington Post couldn't help but blast utterly unbelievable accusations against Kavanaugh because they saw him as a threat to their political positions, and passed on a more credible accusation against Fairfax because printing it would have been against their political positions.
Fail #3 - Your fellow Trump devotees said "whataboutism" isn't allowed. You better apologize before apdst has a meltdown.
Heh, actually, both sides scream "whataboutism!" whenever the comparison isn't in their favor. I'm not faulting you for your comparison, if your Trump hatred had an actual moral foundation you'd be attacking Fairfax rather than throwing in a Trump comparison. So I'm just here faulting you for the hypocrisy.
And no, before you try it, I haven't really stated a position on Fairfax because I don't know if the lady is credible, I just know that waiting for the evidence when it comes to Trump or Kavanaugh has me labeled a misogynist and shouts of "believe all women!" or accusations of being on Putin's payroll.