• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Justice Dept. Never Fully Examined Trump’s Ties to Russia, Ex-Officials Say

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,058
Reaction score
82,284
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Justice Dept. Never Fully Examined Trump’s Ties to Russia, Ex-Officials Say

2JX9Yq_0WoUbN7V00

8/30/20
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department secretly took steps in 2017 to narrow the investigation into Russian election interference and any links to the Trump campaign, according to former law enforcement officials, keeping investigators from completing an examination of President Trump’s decades-long personal and business ties to Russia. The special counsel who finished the investigation, Robert S. Mueller III, secured three dozen indictments and convictions of some top Trump advisers, and he produced a report that outlined Russia’s wide-ranging operations to help get Mr. Trump elected and the president’s efforts to impede the inquiry. But law enforcement officials never fully investigated Mr. Trump’s own relationship with Russia, even though some career F.B.I. counterintelligence investigators thought his ties posed such a national security threat that they took the extraordinary step of opening an inquiry into them. Within days, the former deputy attorney general Rod J. Rosenstein curtailed the investigation without telling the bureau, all but ensuring it would go nowhere. A bipartisan report by the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee released this month came the closest to an examination of the president’s links to Russia.

Mr. Rosenstein declined to comment. The disclosure about the counterintelligence investigation is based on interviews with former Justice Department and F.B.I. officials. Installing Mr. Mueller as special counsel in May 2017, Mr. Rosenstein ordered him to examine “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government” and the Trump campaign. Many Democrats embraced the appointment as a sign that law enforcement would complete a full accounting of Mr. Trump’s ties to Russia. But privately, Mr. Rosenstein instructed Mr. Mueller to conduct only a criminal investigation into whether anyone broke the law in connection with Russia’s 2016 election interference, former law enforcement officials said. f Mr. Mueller wanted to expand his investigation, Mr. Rosenstein told him, he should ask for additional authorities and resources. But the special counsel built a staff — some inherited from the Justice Department and F.B.I., some of whom he hired — to investigate crimes, not threats to national security, which is the purview of counterintelligence investigations. Mr. Mueller later told Congress he did not conduct a counterintelligence investigation. The Democratic chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, said in a memo released last week that he had reason to believe “that the F.B.I. Counterintelligence Division has not investigated counterintelligence risks arising from President Trump’s foreign financial ties.”

This article is adapted from the book “Donald Trump v. The United States: Inside the Struggle to Stop a President” being published on Tuesday (9/1/20) by Random House. The book author is Michael S. Schmidt, a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist with the New York Times. Which begs the question: Has the NYT been sitting on this information until after the Schmidt book was released?
 
https://twitter.com/AWeissmann_/status/1300240647669059587

Andrew Weissman, head Trump Hunter for Mueller, says "not true".

Then again, the guy with the book does have a Pulitzer under his belt so maybe he knows more than the people actually running the investigation. It's also possible that Weissman was secretly working for Trump the whole time and that Schmidt is touching on the biggest scandal our government has ever seen...which he can then discuss in his sequel.
 
Mueller didn't follow the money. i've wondered why he didn't, but as it stands, there's nothing to be done about it except to vote out everyone who has aligned him or herself with Tweety.
 
Back
Top Bottom