- Joined
- Aug 6, 2019
- Messages
- 15,086
- Reaction score
- 6,810
- Location
- Bridgeport, CT
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Your problem is you assume there is some fair system for admission based on merit. There is no such thing. The child of parents who are scientists, professors, and doctors has a huge advantage compared to some kid born to a single mother in a project. Wealthy kids get tutors and attend special coaching classes. Different school districts have different standards and different facilities.
Opportunity is never equal and never will be. Fortunately, thanks to capitalism, we are living in a time where anyone with an internet connection can learn virtually any subject he wants, as long as he is willing to put in the work and hours of study. What progressives want is for opportunity to go to people who aren't willing to put in the work and hours of study.
I spoke to two White teens once who attended a rich High School in Long Island. They told me their school had Bloomberg terminals they used in their economics class. I was shocked. Those things are incredibly expensive. They were donated by Bill O'Reilly. How is some inner school that can barely afford books supposed to compete with that?
The unstated assumption is that you can't get an education without a lot of money. That assumption is absolutely false.