I think no longer being proud of your country is a bit of an overreaction to the FBI not finding enough evidence to indict Hillary. Has it ever occurred to you the RW propaganda might be just that, and there really isn't enough evidence of wrongdoing?
Here's the problem mak2, for the law to be broken, there doesn't have to be intent, just the act. The FBI Director, who prior to today had my respect, stated that they could not prove intent to break the law, not that they didn't break the law.
That nuance is unacceptable, in that if it were you or I, we would have already been arrested, handcuffed, and trotted out in front of the press in a perp walk.
Here's a few laws that we now know for sure, based on the FBI press conference, were broken by Mrs. Clinton:
Law 1 -
18 U.S. Code § 793 (f): Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through
gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(italicized and underline added by me)
Law 2 -
44 U.S. Code § 3101 - Records management by agency heads: The head of each Federal agency shall make and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency and designed to furnish the information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the Government and of persons directly affected by the agency’s activities.
Law 3 -
The 2009 Federal Records Act, Section 1236.22, 36 CFR 1236.22 (b): Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system.
You see, even if she didn't act with intent, as the FBI Director says there's no evidence of, then she acted with gross negligence. There are four elements (five in the
link I give you here, but I combine 2 of them since they are related, and
my law professor taught me the 4, as seen in this link) to prove negligence - 1) Duty, 2) Failure to act on the Duty, 3) a Harm, and 4) a Causal Relationship between the Failure to act on the Duty and Harm. All of which were discussed by the FBI Director in his press conference today. She obviously had a Duty to protect classified information under Law 2 and Law 3 above. Second, she failed to act on that duty as defined in Law 1 and Law 2 above as the evidence has shown. Third, the FBI Director has stated that classified information was transmitted in the open to people without the proper clearances and that it is possible that classified information was intercepted by enemies of the country, in violation of Law 1 above. and lastly, there is an undeniable relationship, a causal relationship (AKA in legal terms, a Proximal Cause) between Mrs. Clinton's failure to act on the Duty as specified in Law2 and Law 3, which caused the harm described as a breach of law in Law 1. So there it is, all four parts of Negligence.
Gross Negligence because of who she was and the level of her duty to act.