- Joined
- Jan 20, 2020
- Messages
- 20,325
- Reaction score
- 4,175
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
We've been hoping for that for years. Still waiting.So you agree with ending title 42 for the border?
We've been hoping for that for years. Still waiting.So you agree with ending title 42 for the border?
I definitely add points on my scale for those things...Yes, black skin and a vagina are Biden's minimum qualifications.
What does that have to do with what I said? Your post is stupid.
I definitely add points on my scale for those things...
The Biden team started with qualified; the trump team started with white.We were discussing the judges qualifications. I was pointing out that it's the Biden Team's starting point for selecting judges and Vice Presidents.
Projection. Total projection. Classic projection.Like I keep saying, liberals will never be free in this nation unless they manage to get rid of every Republican and every republican institution as well as all independents that disagree with the liberal agenda. If you're a liberal then the final solution is the only solution!
I don't get your fetish with "title 42 for the border" when it comes to this mask mandate case. This opinion was based on a completely different section of law (42 USC 264(a)) that was being used as the authority for issuing the mandate. That section of law delegates regulating authority to the Surgeon General in certain areas to facilitate control of the spread of infectious disease. The border authority is based on 42 USC 265 which explicitly and directly delegates the authority to control entry to the United States of persons originating from high-risk countries, in accordance with regulations already in place. There is no rulemaking taking place, only the exercise of explicitly-delegated powers and already-emplaced regulations. No notice-and-comment is required to enforce established law and regulation.So you agree with ending title 42 for the border?
Said by whom? "Civilrights.org"?Let's look at what was said about her when she was appointed
from https://civilrights.org/resource/op...ct-court-for-the-middle-district-of-florida/#
Said by whom? "Civilrights.org"?
Regardless, this doesn't address the question - what about the ruling is "right wing"?
The CDC has the power to do anything it is statutorily authorized to do.Does the CDC only have the power to enact measures that sanitize?
That's the question here. What is meant by "sanitation" in the authorizing act. One can agree or disagree with her opinion, but nothing about it is "right wing" as stated in the OP. There is no "right wing" definition of sanitation.Do masks sanitize?
The CDC has the power to do anything it is statutorily authorized to do.
That's the question here. What is meant by "sanitation" in the authorizing act. One can agree or disagree with her opinion, but nothing about it is "right wing" as stated in the OP. There is no "right wing" definition of sanitation.
Who knew that cleaning was "right wing"?
So you agree with ending title 42 for the border?
Who knew that cleaning was "right wing"?
I see. You have zero understanding of what the CDC does.Who knew congress went to such trouble to give the CDC the power to only clean...
I see. You have zero understanding of what the CDC does.
A mask filters the air. Filtering cleans the air of harmful infectious agents. The decision is right wing because it's motivated by ideology, not science or public health.So, did congress limit the CDC to only cleaning things?
It is callously disregarding the lives of individuals who will come into contact with the people who get infected on the planes, that's pretty right wing. you are, of course, now shifting the burden of proof, since you asked 'How do you know if she is right winged'. THis particular blurb, by civil rights lawyers, indicate not only is she a right wing demegouge, but she's not qualified. Not only that, it was from 2020, before she was appointed.Said by whom? "Civilrights.org"?
Regardless, this doesn't address the question - what about the ruling is "right wing"?
Sack Congress in a violent attempt to overturn the election results if their Dear Leader isn't elected? Oh wait, that's what the Right does these days.Like I keep saying, liberals will never be free in this nation unless they manage to get rid of every Republican and every republican institution as well as all independents that disagree with the liberal agenda. If you're a liberal then the final solution is the only solution!
Like I keep saying, liberals will never be free in this nation unless they manage to get rid of every Republican and every republican institution as well as all independents that disagree with the liberal agenda. If you're a liberal then the final solution is the only solution!
Everybody wants to own at least enough to live on!